A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Class B bust my fault or the controllers ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old May 31st 05, 02:09 AM
Guillermo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message ...


Guillermo wrote:

"Doug" wrote in message
oups.com...
Uh, If you are on an IFR flight plan, you don't need to hear "cleared
for Class B". At least that is always the way it has worked for me.


If you are in IFR clearance you only got to distinguinsh two classes of
airspace: controlled and uncontrolled. You don't need to worry about

the
classes of controlled airspace.


Well, you do have to worry about equipage to go above FL 240 (DME) and

above
290 (RVSM).


I'm not planning on going above FL240 in the C172RG that I fly.
I wish I were flying something that could go that high up

What is RVSM?


  #42  
Old May 31st 05, 01:06 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Guillermo wrote:

wrote in message ...


Guillermo wrote:

"Doug" wrote in message
oups.com...
Uh, If you are on an IFR flight plan, you don't need to hear "cleared
for Class B". At least that is always the way it has worked for me.


If you are in IFR clearance you only got to distinguinsh two classes of
airspace: controlled and uncontrolled. You don't need to worry about

the
classes of controlled airspace.


Well, you do have to worry about equipage to go above FL 240 (DME) and

above
290 (RVSM).


I'm not planning on going above FL240 in the C172RG that I fly.
I wish I were flying something that could go that high up

What is RVSM?


Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect in the U.S., Mexico
and Canada this past January 20th, where the former 2,000 feet of vertical
separation above flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have to
have to have additional approval to operate up there.

  #43  
Old May 31st 05, 02:07 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message ...

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect in the U.S.,
Mexico
and Canada this past January 20th, where the former 2,000 feet of vertical
separation above flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have
to
have to have additional approval to operate up there.


Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.


  #44  
Old May 31st 05, 02:32 PM
Guillermo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK with no RVSM

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message ...

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect in the U.S.,
Mexico
and Canada this past January 20th, where the former 2,000 feet of

vertical
separation above flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you

have
to
have to have additional approval to operate up there.


Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.




  #45  
Old May 31st 05, 02:48 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Guillermo" wrote in message
...

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK with no RVSM


Only if you're VFR. If you're IFR you'll have to take the C172RG to FL430.
RVSM ends at FL410 so 2000 feet vertical separation is required for all IFR
aircraft regardless of RVSM capability.


  #46  
Old May 31st 05, 06:22 PM
Everett M. Greene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Guillermo" writes:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
wrote

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect
in the U.S., Mexico and Canada this past January 20th,
where the former 2,000 feet of vertical separation above
flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have
to have additional approval to operate up there.


Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK
with no RVSM


But then you have to keep your eyes open for low-flying SR-71s!
I believe they're a tad faster than your 172.

Strange limits. You can be cleared to FL410 and above but
how do you get there without the RVSM and DME?
  #47  
Old May 31st 05, 07:46 PM
Brad Zeigler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Everett M. Greene" wrote in message
...
"Guillermo" writes:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
wrote

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect
in the U.S., Mexico and Canada this past January 20th,
where the former 2,000 feet of vertical separation above
flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have
to have additional approval to operate up there.

Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK
with no RVSM


But then you have to keep your eyes open for low-flying SR-71s!
I believe they're a tad faster than your 172.

Strange limits. You can be cleared to FL410 and above but
how do you get there without the RVSM and DME?


By climbing through all the altitudes below your clearance altitude.


  #48  
Old May 31st 05, 10:22 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Brad Zeigler wrote:

"Everett M. Greene" wrote in message
...
"Guillermo" writes:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
wrote

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect
in the U.S., Mexico and Canada this past January 20th,
where the former 2,000 feet of vertical separation above
flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have
to have additional approval to operate up there.

Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK
with no RVSM


But then you have to keep your eyes open for low-flying SR-71s!
I believe they're a tad faster than your 172.

Strange limits. You can be cleared to FL410 and above but
how do you get there without the RVSM and DME?


By climbing through all the altitudes below your clearance altitude.


But, if you are not RVSM compliant, you can't even climb or descend
through the RVSM altitudes unless ATC gives you a dispensation.

  #49  
Old May 31st 05, 10:32 PM
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , wrote:


Brad Zeigler wrote:

"Everett M. Greene" wrote in message
...
"Guillermo" writes:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote
wrote

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum. It went into effect
in the U.S., Mexico and Canada this past January 20th,
where the former 2,000 feet of vertical separation above
flight level 290 was reduced to 1,000 feet, and you have
to have additional approval to operate up there.

Not above FL290, between FL290 and FL410.

ok, so then I'll take the C172RG to FL420 and I'll be OK
with no RVSM

But then you have to keep your eyes open for low-flying SR-71s!
I believe they're a tad faster than your 172.

Strange limits. You can be cleared to FL410 and above but
how do you get there without the RVSM and DME?


By climbing through all the altitudes below your clearance altitude.


But, if you are not RVSM compliant, you can't even climb or descend
through the RVSM altitudes unless ATC gives you a dispensation.


Get NASA to give you a lift on one of their shuttle-carrier 747's then
drop you once you're up there. At least that takes care of the
climbing part; I guess you still need to figure out the descending
part.


  #50  
Old May 31st 05, 11:57 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But, if you are not RVSM compliant, you can't even climb or descend
through the RVSM altitudes unless ATC gives you a dispensation.


.... or you go out over the Pacific ocean. Or is this global?

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carrying flight gear on the airlines Peter MacPherson Piloting 20 November 25th 04 12:29 AM
World Class: Recent Great News Charles Yeates Soaring 58 March 19th 04 06:58 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
One Design viability? Stewart Kissel Soaring 41 December 10th 03 03:27 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.