![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've used progressives for years and like them a lot. I did try
bifocals for a while but they drove me crazy. Not all progressives are the same - the middle or short distance sections can be made larger or smaller depending on which is more important. I do computer work all day, and the optician gave me a set of progressives that have a pretty wide range at that distance. It still requires more head movement than a true tri-focal, but that becomes second nature after a month. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, did that.
Jim "Cub Driver" usenet AT danford DOT net wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:57:37 -0600, "N93332" wrote: They all did the basics of filling a cup, hearing, eye check, hearing, BP, height, weight, etc. A couple of them did color blind check, a different couple did the 'turn-your-head-and-cough', and one also checked reflexes. Did any one have you stand on each foot in turn to check your sense of balance? -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, I think he's had several.... he's recovering from a triple
by-pass! ![]() Jim "Cub Driver" usenet AT danford DOT net wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 09:18:08 -0800, "Jim Burns" wrote: Anyway, after it was all over, my glasses are fine and I left with my Class 2 in my pocket. That's wonderful as far as it goes, but what are we going to do about your doctor? Sounds like he's the one needing a checkup. -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I have my Class 2 renewal in January and have been wondering what a difference the presbyopia that I started noticing in low light a couple of years back will make in my vision test. Thankfully my distance vision has thus remained 20/20 and except for the low-light small text presbyopia thing,,, my near vision is quite good. Yeah, my near-vision has gone completely to crap in the last few years. I still don't wear bi-focals, but both my eye and medical doctors told me that my days are, indeed, numbered. I can't see diddly on a sectional anymore without holding it four inches from my eyes. Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Any benefit there? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" I got nailed this year with "must possess for near vision", oh well, getting old is hell. Margy |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
From your post, though, it seems that your normal vision is ok -- you just need reading glasses. Bwa-ha-haaaa! I can't see ANYTHING without my glasses, beyond about 6 inches. 2000 years ago, I'd be dead by now, simply because no one would want to hunt for me anymore... ;-) I used to be like that (well, it was closer to 2 inches). A bit of Lasik and I was glasses free for 5 years, now it's the reading glasses routine. 2 pairs of nothing on top and 1.25 on the bottom for $49.95 (clear or sun) from readingglasses.com. Margy |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Margy wrote:
I got nailed this year with "must possess for near vision", oh well, getting old is hell. It beats the alternative. :-/ -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Just had another thought or two (I'm done for the day). You might check out the trifocals or bifocals first. The lenses are much cheaper than progressives, so it's a good deal if they work for you and you haven't wasted that much money if they don't. The other thing you might consider is that the best progressives are made in France. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:15:34 GMT, George Patterson
wrote in Ghdef.1069$Rb.1009@trndny01:: the best progressives are made in France. And here I thought they were made by Nikon. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The other thing you might consider is that the best progressives are made
in France. Well, then I've certainly got nothing Toulouse... (Sorry... :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I have my Class 2 renewal in January and have been wondering what a difference the presbyopia that I started noticing in low light a couple of years back will make in my vision test. Thankfully my distance vision has thus remained 20/20 and except for the low-light small text presbyopia thing,,, my near vision is quite good. Yeah, my near-vision has gone completely to crap in the last few years. I still don't wear bi-focals, but both my eye and medical doctors told me that my days are, indeed, numbered. I can't see diddly on a sectional anymore without holding it four inches from my eyes. Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Any benefit there? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Jay, As one who is required to wear corrective lenses for driving/flying, I too noticed my near vision was going down hill. Switched to progressive lenses a couple of years back. You will either love them or hate them. I found them to be quite easy to get used to. Others never can get used to them. You will never know unless you try them. One word of caution. I had to have my glasses remade because they set the focal point for reading to dang low. It turned out to be a problem when glancing at a sectional chart while flying and trying to look up and out as well. Solution. I brought my sectional with me and had them set the focal point higher based on a simulation of me looking straight ahead as if I were flying and I would occasionally look down at the sectional. Problem solved and they work great. Just part of the passage of time to being middle aged I guess. Good Luck! Kevin Kubiak PP-ASEL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Ten Years of Flying | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | February 19th 05 02:05 PM |
HAVE YOU HEARD THE GOOD NEWS! | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 26th 05 07:08 PM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |