Scholars for 9/11 Truth -- HTTP://ST911.ORG

TRUTH wrote:


That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
Pentagon

YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
DID hit the Pentagon?

From the website:

"it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
widespread 9/11 hoax"

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

mrtravel wrote in news:QkyMf.25472$_S7.7736
@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:

TRUTH wrote:


That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
Pentagon

YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
DID hit the Pentagon?

From the website:

"it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
widespread 9/11 hoax"


That's what I get for not checking into it first

That seems to be an endemic problem with the "9/11 Truth Movement."

The signal/noise ratio there approaches zero.

TRUTH wrote:
mrtravel wrote in news:QkyMf.25472$_S7.7736
@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:

TRUTH wrote:

That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
Pentagon
YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
DID hit the Pentagon?

From the website:

"it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
widespread 9/11 hoax"





That's what I get for not checking into it first

Or checking into what a squib is or checking into whether airliners
fly on diesel oil or..etc. Time to quit before you lose anymore ground.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Dan wrote:

Or checking into what a squib is or checking into whether airliners
fly on diesel oil or..etc. Time to quit before you lose anymore ground.


You'll love one of the claims posted elsewhere on the net and it went
something like this:.
:
One of the aircraft must have had a cabin decompression because it was
at 30K+ and 'suddenly' lost 600 feet...
:
Dunno about you but I'd expect the 'sudden' loss of altitude to be more
in the 20K range
:-)