![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
To those who fly with STCs for motor fuel instead of avgas, is the
phase-out of MTBE affecting you? Not here in Iowa. We've still got plenty of non-alcohol-contaminated regular unleaded gasoline. Which is truly ironic, no? All this ethanol nonsense originated here, with all of our heavily subsidized corn (that no one knew what else to do with) -- and we (of all people!) aren't mandating its use. Only in America! (And speaking of Iran, I don't know about nuking them, but I would support disarming them -- now. The thought of them -- or anyone like them -- having nuclear weapons is truly horrific, and makes the Cold War era seem tame and predictable by comparision.) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Not here in Iowa. We've still got plenty of non-alcohol-contaminated regular unleaded gasoline. Did you have to make any changes in your plane to start using automotive fuel, or did you just start using it? Thanks. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did you have to make any changes in your plane to start using automotive
fuel, or did you just start using it? Thanks. No physical changes are required to use 87 octane unleaded mogas in our O-540-powered Piper. It's just a paperwork thing. (You have to buy the STC in order for it to be "legal" to burn mogas...) Luckily, a previous owner (2 or 3 owners ago) paid Petersen for that STC, so I've been reaping that benefit ever since. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, iA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Super Dave" wrote in message nk.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Not here in Iowa. We've still got plenty of non-alcohol-contaminated regular unleaded gasoline. Did you have to make any changes in your plane to start using automotive fuel, or did you just start using it? Thanks. Well the Peterson STC for my Cessna involved putting a sticker next to each gas cap stating that mogas above 91 R+M octane was legal in all concentrations mixed with 100 octane avgas, and a small clamp that is stamped with the STC# is attached to one of the pushrod tubes. That it. Nothing more except the usual logbook and STC paperwork. This is on a O235L2C in a C-152. The last engine burned avgas for the first 500 hours, and mogas for the next 1500 hours. My problems with lead fouled plugs disappeared when I switched to mogas. But since I put in a new engine 400 hours ago, mogas where I live is tainted with alcohol, so.... back to burning leaded avgas......and cleaning my lower plugs very regularly, no thanks to our govenator and the feds. John Severyn @KLVK |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"J. Severyn" wrote:
"Super Dave" wrote in message nk.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Not here in Iowa. We've still got plenty of non-alcohol-contaminated regular unleaded gasoline. Did you have to make any changes in your plane to start using automotive fuel, or did you just start using it? Thanks. Well the Peterson STC for my Cessna involved putting a sticker next to each gas cap stating that mogas above 91 R+M octane was legal in all concentrations mixed with 100 octane avgas, and a small clamp that is stamped with the STC# is attached to one of the pushrod tubes. That it. Nothing more except the usual logbook and STC paperwork. This is on a O235L2C in a C-152. The last engine burned avgas for the first 500 hours, and mogas for the next 1500 hours. My problems with lead fouled plugs disappeared when I switched to mogas. But since I put in a new engine 400 hours ago, mogas where I live is tainted with alcohol, so.... back to burning leaded avgas......and cleaning my lower plugs very regularly, no thanks to our govenator and the feds. Didn't AOPA say that a new unleaded avgas was going to save the day? 82UL or something? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:35:33 -0400, John wrote:
The federal government hasn't banned MTBE outright (some individual states have) but will not protect oil companies from MTBE lawsuits so MTBE is being phased out by next week in most places. I think you have to make that *all* places. There may be some MTBE still being pumped out of the ground, but nobody is going to manufacture it because Congress did not renew the immunity to liability that companies previously had. Nobody wants to repriese the asbestos liability monster. My local airport was so fussy about mogas that it found a dealer in Maine that would deliver mogas without MTBE. I don't know what will happen to the mogas pump. I understand that there's a huge problem about ethanol in that it can't be stored for long periods of time or sent over long distances because water will cause the ethanol to separate out (funny, I thought that that was why we put alcohol in our gasoline in New Hampshire, to get the water to meld with the fuel). I don't see how ethanol mix can sit in the ground for months or a year without suffering the same fate. The airport just doesn't sell that much mogas. Or maybe non-MTBE, non-ethanol gasoline will still be available in Maine? - all the best, Dan Ford Wikipedia: the belief that 10,000 monkeys playing at 10,000 keyboards can create a reference work |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cub Driver opined
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:35:33 -0400, John wrote: The federal government hasn't banned MTBE outright (some individual states have) but will not protect oil companies from MTBE lawsuits so MTBE is being phased out by next week in most places. I think you have to make that *all* places. There may be some MTBE still being pumped out of the ground, but nobody is going to manufacture it because Congress did not renew the immunity to liability that companies previously had. Nobody wants to repriese the asbestos liability monster. My local airport was so fussy about mogas that it found a dealer in Maine that would deliver mogas without MTBE. I don't know what will happen to the mogas pump. I understand that there's a huge problem about ethanol in that it can't be stored for long periods of time or sent over long distances because water will cause the ethanol to separate out (funny, I thought that that was why we put alcohol in our gasoline in New Hampshire, to get the water to meld with the fuel). I don't see how ethanol mix can sit in the ground for months or a year without suffering the same fate. The airport just doesn't sell that much mogas. Different alcohol. Or maybe non-MTBE, non-ethanol gasoline will still be available in Maine? -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ash Wyllie wrote:
Cub Driver opined On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:35:33 -0400, John wrote: The federal government hasn't banned MTBE outright (some individual states have) but will not protect oil companies from MTBE lawsuits so MTBE is being phased out by next week in most places. I think you have to make that *all* places. There may be some MTBE still being pumped out of the ground, but nobody is going to manufacture it because Congress did not renew the immunity to liability that companies previously had. Nobody wants to repriese the asbestos liability monster. My local airport was so fussy about mogas that it found a dealer in Maine that would deliver mogas without MTBE. I don't know what will happen to the mogas pump. I understand that there's a huge problem about ethanol in that it can't be stored for long periods of time or sent over long distances because water will cause the ethanol to separate out (funny, I thought that that was why we put alcohol in our gasoline in New Hampshire, to get the water to meld with the fuel). I don't see how ethanol mix can sit in the ground for months or a year without suffering the same fate. The airport just doesn't sell that much mogas. Different alcohol Nope. Ethyl Alchol "absorbs" water that comes across. Actually the ethanol get mixed in solution with the water. That is why it is used to remove water from gas tanks. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cub Driver wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:35:33 -0400, John wrote: The federal government hasn't banned MTBE outright (some individual states have) but will not protect oil companies from MTBE lawsuits so MTBE is being phased out by next week in most places. I think you have to make that *all* places. There may be some MTBE still being pumped out of the ground, but nobody is going to manufacture it because Congress did not renew the immunity to liability that companies previously had. Nobody wants to repriese the asbestos liability monster. My local airport was so fussy about mogas that it found a dealer in Maine that would deliver mogas without MTBE. I don't know what will happen to the mogas pump. I understand that there's a huge problem about ethanol in that it can't be stored for long periods of time or sent over long distances because water will cause the ethanol to separate out (funny, I thought that that was why we put alcohol in our gasoline in New Hampshire, to get the water to meld with the fuel). It's the same principle, but ethanol will keep picking up water it comes across. A pipeline may have small amounts of water here and there but this can get added again and again over long distances. The fuel becomes less and less useable as more and more water is added, because obviously the water doesn't contain any useable energy and it takes energy to evaporate that water in a cylinder. When you add alcohol to remove water (ice) from a gas tank, there is a very limited amount of water (hopefully) so the effects of that water aren't great, especially compared to ice blocking your fuel line. I don't see how ethanol mix can sit in the ground for months or a year without suffering the same fate. The airport just doesn't sell that much mogas. Or maybe non-MTBE, non-ethanol gasoline will still be available in Maine? Time will tell. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been using mogas in my Tripacer for 6 years now, but we've recently
(MA) switched to ethanol. I actually had to siphon my tanks after putting in what I thought was MTBE gas. This change along with the rapidly rising fuel costs have me seriously considering selling the plane-something I really don't want to do. But here I am on a beautiful Sunday morning typing away instead of flying away. This is a real double whammy for me. Either the rising prices OR the ethanol thing I could probably absorb, but both together is a real killer. mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "John" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:35 AM Subject: MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE To those who fly with STCs for motor fuel instead of avgas, is the phase-out of MTBE affecting you? "John" wrote in message ... To those who fly with STCs for motor fuel instead of avgas, is the phase-out of MTBE affecting you? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ethanol mogas | john smith | Owning | 16 | May 2nd 06 02:30 PM |
| MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 82 | May 19th 05 03:49 PM |
| MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Owning | 87 | May 19th 05 03:49 PM |
| Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil | Victor | Owning | 4 | March 30th 05 10:10 PM |