A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old September 23rd 06, 06:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Fry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?

The Poison Theory

The poison theory attempts to provide an explanation for why motion
sickness and cybersickness occur from an evolutionary standpoint. The
theory suggests that the ingestion of poison causes physiological
effects involving the coordination of the visual, vestibular, and
other sensory input systems. These physiological effects act as an
early warning system which enhances survival by removing the contents
of the stomach.
--
For a sucessful technology, honesty must take precedence over public
relations for nature cannot be fooled.
Richard Feynman
  #42  
Old September 23rd 06, 06:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
In that case, the CFI would be the sole PIC, and the CFI would have to
hold an instrument rating, but would be only demonstrating IMC
operations, not actually instructing in them?


There is always a sole PIC.


That's true.

A CFI is always the PIC with a pre-PP student.


But in this case, would the "student" be able to log PIC time as is
normally authorized?


A pre-PP student can never log PIC time except when flying solo. With a PP
(or sport or recreational) license, you can log PIC time whenever you're the
sole manipulator of an aircraft for which you're rated. But you don't have
to be rated for the flight conditions; so you don't need an instrument
rating to log PIC time in IMC.

CFIs always need an instrument rating.


That's not the way I read the regulations:
§ 61.183 Eligibility requirements...
Doesn't that '_or_' in '(2)' above mean there is an alternate way to
comply with instructor requirements sans an instrument rating?


The wording of 61.183b2 is notoriously unclear. But my understanding is that
it's meant to require an instrument rating (or else equivalent ATP
privileges) for the appropriate class and category of aircraft.

--Gary


  #43  
Old September 24th 06, 07:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?

On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:10:50 -0400, "Ron Snipes"
wrote:

This accident was posted on the newsgroups right after it happened. Now
published on the NTSB website, which gives us more info than the 6pm news.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the family left behind, but with that
said.....How can you throw everything you learned in Flight Training about
Weather, out the window. I also considered a subject line of: Just how many
G's does it take to rip the wings off a C-150? What a shame.


Actually it's very easy.
This is a typical case of VFR into IMC the pilot panicking (the I cant
see, I can't see tells that), gets disoriented, and losing control.
After that it's only a matter of time and not much of it before
something gets broken.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #44  
Old September 26th 06, 07:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
...
One reason that IMC isn't even required for an instrument rating (let

alone
for a private pilot certificate) is that (benign) IMC is rare in many

parts
of the country. In those places, an IMC requirement would make it all but
impossible to become a pilot.


On the other hand, I've seen level-5 thunderstorms come through and
technically it was still VFR... Not that I would have even pulled my
airplane out of the hangar at those times...

That's kind of the reason that I haven't been that serious about getting my
instrument rating... Around here, usually if the weather is bad enough to be
IFR, I don't really want to be up in it... Sometimes we get the mild IFR
conditions where it's just low clouds and such, but it sure does seem like
everytime I get weathered out of a flight, it's not somthing I would want to
be going up in even with an instument rating...


  #45  
Old September 27th 06, 02:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Margy Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 476
Default Get-Home-Itis, Arrogance, or What?

Roy Smith wrote:
"Gary Drescher" wrote:

There is always a sole PIC. A CFI is always the PIC with a pre-PP student.
CFIs always need an instrument rating. As far as I know, there is no reason
that a CFI can't let a student manipulate the controls in IMC; the time is
logged as dual, but not for purposes of an instrument rating.



I did plenty of that as a student pilot. I knew I wanted to start on my
instrument rating right away and my instructor was happy to fly in IMC. At
the point where I was almost done with my private, we agreed that if the
weather were ever IFR on a day we had a flight secheduled, rather than
canceling, we would just go out and play in the clouds.

I still don't have an instrument rating, but I have 3 hours of actual
from my student pilot days. It's not bad experience for anyone.

Margy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
faa home study graduation certificate Falky foo Piloting 19 February 10th 05 11:38 PM
[Media] A Marine's journey home Michael Wise Military Aviation 0 May 3rd 04 04:57 AM
[Media] A Marine's journey home Michael Wise Naval Aviation 0 May 3rd 04 04:57 AM
Home Inspection Listings Patrick Glenn Home Built 4 April 26th 04 11:52 AM
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive William Summers Piloting 0 March 18th 04 03:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.