![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not really. You're flying on inertia and prop thrust. You wing will provide
lift with the lift vector horizontal, but when your speed decays to zero, even though at that point the wing is not providing any lift, it is not stalled nor has it stalled at any point. mike "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... "mike regish" wrote in message . .. Consider vertical flight. You can have 0 airspeed and not be stalled. Hope the plane's built for tailslides, though. So then your not flying on the wing your flying on the prop. This is more like a rocket. mike |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Aluckyguess" wrote in message
... Consider vertical flight. You can have 0 airspeed and not be stalled. Hope the plane's built for tailslides, though. So then your not flying on the wing your flying on the prop. This is more like a rocket. IMHO, it was a well-intended but poor example. At 0 airspeed, there is 0 pounds of lift. The reason the example was well-intended is that it's a scenario in which you could be moving, but in which the airplane is supported by something other than the wing, and so the wing need not generate lift equal to weight (as it normally would). In this case, some airspeed below the stalling speed is fine, and the wing is not stalled. As Mike says, even if the airspeed falls to 0, the wing never stalls. Pete |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the airspeed is NOT zero. The propeller is causing moving air to be
pushed over the surface of the wings!! Peter Duniho wrote: "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... Consider vertical flight. You can have 0 airspeed and not be stalled. Hope the plane's built for tailslides, though. So then your not flying on the wing your flying on the prop. This is more like a rocket. IMHO, it was a well-intended but poor example. At 0 airspeed, there is 0 pounds of lift. The reason the example was well-intended is that it's a scenario in which you could be moving, but in which the airplane is supported by something other than the wing, and so the wing need not generate lift equal to weight (as it normally would). In this case, some airspeed below the stalling speed is fine, and the wing is not stalled. As Mike says, even if the airspeed falls to 0, the wing never stalls. Pete |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was meant to be my point.
Maybe not perfectly stated. mike "Peter Duniho" wrote in message As Mike says, even if the airspeed falls to 0, the wing never stalls. Pete |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug" wrote in message
oups.com... But the airspeed is NOT zero. The propeller is causing moving air to be pushed over the surface of the wings!! It may or may not be. But there's no reason to assume that it is. An airplane with a pusher propeller, or a jet, or a sailplane, or whatever, would behave in exactly the same way. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |