![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Matt Barrow posted:
"Kingfish" wrote in message oups.com... Matt Barrow wrote: http://www.eclipseaviation.com/affordability/economics/ (Compare the Eclipse 500 and the Baron) Eclipse sez $29K to insure a Baron? Yikes. That makes a 10 year old B58 look a lot more attractive to a buyer huh? But if you MUST have glass... IIRC, light twins have the highest accident rates...by far. Not so, in terms of the percentage of the fleet, however, the percentage of fatal accidents is about 10% higher than singles (NTSB 2001). Neil |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
news ![]() Matt Barrow wrote: http://www.eclipseaviation.com/affordability/economics/ (Compare the Eclipse 500 and the Baron) Using an Eclipse site for cost comparisons is pretty funny. I'd like to see some unbiased data. Did you check their data sources? (This is my only response, Matt, as I'm not into your typical lame filibustering). |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message news ![]() Matt Barrow wrote: http://www.eclipseaviation.com/affordability/economics/ (Compare the Eclipse 500 and the Baron) Using an Eclipse site for cost comparisons is pretty funny. I'd like to see some unbiased data. Did you check their data sources? (This is my only response, Matt, as I'm not into your typical lame filibustering). No, as I can't afford any of the airplanes on their list. However, I know from past experience that you have to take manufacturer's comparisons with a large grain of salt. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|