A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

American pilots charged in Amazon jetliner crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 13th 06, 11:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default American pilots charged in Amazon jetliner crash

In article , "Morgans"
wrote:

I read that the major weakness of TCAS is that they do not perform very well
for
nearly head on flight paths. True? I don't know. I just read it,
somewhere.


read it where?

Given how TCAS II works, it doesn't make sense that a head-on encounter
wouldn't work well, even at cruise speeds.

Have you ever talked to anyone that was involved in flight testing of
TCAS II?

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #2  
Old December 15th 06, 01:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default American pilots charged in Amazon jetliner crash


"Bob Noel" wrote

read it where?


If I knew, I would have gone back and quoted it, here! g That is kinda' like
trying to look up how to spell a wierd word in a dictionary. How do you look up
how to spell it, if you don't know how to spell it? ;-)

I think it was on one of the aviation newsletters that I get on a subscription
basis. AvWeb, perhaps?

Given how TCAS II works, it doesn't make sense that a head-on encounter
wouldn't work well, even at cruise speeds.


Could be the high closing speeds, the radiation paterns of the antenna, or
something. I don't have any more details.

Have you ever talked to anyone that was involved in flight testing of
TCAS II?


Nope. Like I said, I only heard (or read) it, and posted it as a very "iffy",
possible-maybe-could be it-explanation.

Not very definitive, don't you think? g
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
FAA Investigates American Flyers SFM Instrument Flight Rules 57 November 7th 03 09:33 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.