Air buss loss at Paris Airshow?

In article . com,
says...


Two more words: intelligent design. That's what is lacking at Airbus.



Oh No!
Now we're into religion!
Let me guess - Airbus, in this scenario, represents evil Darwinism,
while Boeing, represents - you guessed it - Intelligent Design!!



Seriously though - do you know anything about Airbus? The company - their
business model - the type of engineers they hire - their training, their
engineering program - where they are located - what their logo looks like- I
mean anything at all? Do you know anything at all about Airbus aircraft?
(rhetorical question)

Can you offer a justification that a thinking person could accept for the
statement that "intelligent design" is lacking at Airbus?


It really cracks me up - I mean I am really getting a laugh at these clowns
at the zenith of their ignorance making blanket statements about a company
like Airbus "not having a clue about real pilots" ot "lacking intelligent
design. . ." It's really really funny!!

Mxsmanic,

and many other incidents since then.


Ok, enough. Provide us with a comparison of Airbus and Boeing accidents
since (and including) Habsheim. Prove to us with that data that FBW
Airbus types have significantly more accidents than Boeing non-FBW.
Prove that, if you can show the former (you won't be able to, but try),
that the accident types show a connection to FBW design.

If you can't provide this, you are obviously a slanderous liar.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Mxsmanic,

And at Airbus, mistakes are transferred from pilots to the
manufacturer.


Proof? Cites? You won't provide them, as usual. You're blathering away
cluelessly. I'd really like to know what this kind of behaviour adds to
your life.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas

This nut thrives, even on abuse, if that is all the attention he can get. That
is what trolls do.

Do us and yourself a favor. Ignore him.

That is what he deserves.
--
Jim in NC

Greg,

is this the cue to get into the
Boeing runaway rudder discussion?


It might be a great cue. There goes MX's theory of all things
mechanical being "under total command of the pilot" out of the window.
A completely non-FBW connection between pilot and rudder - and still
the rudder deflects uncommandedly.

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Thomas Borchert writes:

If you can't provide this, you are obviously a slanderous liar.

No, I'm simply not willing and/or able to provide it. That says
nothing about whether or not I'm telling the truth, and it is
unrelated to spoken defamation (slander).

You haven't provided anything to support your point of view, but that
does not make you a liar.

Calling someone a liar without being able to prove it is libel in some
cases, however.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Greg Farris writes:

Oh oh - getting serious now!

I'm already serious.

Has your ignorance already killed people?

No.

Are you admitting something you would be better not in public?

No.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Greg Farris wrote:
In article . com,
says...


Two more words: intelligent design. That's what is lacking at Airbus.



Oh No!
Now we're into religion!
Let me guess - Airbus, in this scenario, represents evil Darwinism,
while Boeing, represents - you guessed it - Intelligent Design!!



Seriously though - do you know anything about Airbus? The company - their
business model - the type of engineers they hire - their training, their
engineering program - where they are located - what their logo looks like- I
mean anything at all? Do you know anything at all about Airbus aircraft?
(rhetorical question)

Can you offer a justification that a thinking person could accept for the
statement that "intelligent design" is lacking at Airbus?


It really cracks me up - I mean I am really getting a laugh at these clowns
at the zenith of their ignorance making blanket statements about a company
like Airbus "not having a clue about real pilots" ot "lacking intelligent
design. . ." It's really really funny!!

Lets see, I worked for Boeing for 8 years, mostly on the 777 Flight
Deck Displays (AIMS), and while there, I was privy to a lot of
competitive analysis of Airbus products.

Yep, you are right, I am just an ignoramus.

Dean

Greg Farris wrote:
In article . com,
says...


Two more words: intelligent design. That's what is lacking at Airbus.



Oh No!
Now we're into religion!
Let me guess - Airbus, in this scenario, represents evil Darwinism,
while Boeing, represents - you guessed it - Intelligent Design!!



Seriously though - do you know anything about Airbus? The company - their
business model - the type of engineers they hire - their training, their
engineering program - where they are located - what their logo looks like- I
mean anything at all? Do you know anything at all about Airbus aircraft?
(rhetorical question)

Can you offer a justification that a thinking person could accept for the
statement that "intelligent design" is lacking at Airbus?


It really cracks me up - I mean I am really getting a laugh at these clowns
at the zenith of their ignorance making blanket statements about a company
like Airbus "not having a clue about real pilots" ot "lacking intelligent
design. . ." It's really really funny!!

Lets see, I worked for Boeing for 8 years, mostly on the 777 Flight
Deck Displays (AIMS), and while there, I was privy to a lot of
competitive analysis of Airbus products.

Yep, you are right, I am just an ignoramus.

Dean

In article ,
says...


It really cracks me up - I mean I am really getting a laugh at these clowns
at the zenith of their ignorance making blanket statements about a company
like Airbus "not having a clue about real pilots" ot "lacking intelligent
design. . ." It's really really funny!!

Is it funny when people die?


Oh oh - getting serious now!
Has your ignorance already killed people?
Are you admitting something you would be better not in public?