![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... That's reassuring. I wouldn't want to fly anything without an autopilot--a good one. You couldn't fly your desk without an autopilot, moron. How much do autopilots for small aircraft cost? Do they have to be provided for at the factory, or can they be retrofitted to an aircraft? Do you just talk to hear your head rattle? I don't like that idea at all. Even airliners have positive disconnects for the autopilot. I'll alert the media and the FAA. We'll ground everything without a disconnect at once! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Robert M. Gary writes: I think you'll find that it is very odd for a high performance single to not have some sort of an autopilot. That's reassuring. I wouldn't want to fly anything without an autopilot--a good one. Why?? What difference does it make? For your average light aircraft like I fly the autopilot is of limited use anyway. I use heading mode infrequently at best. How much do autopilots for small aircraft cost? Do they have to be provided for at the factory, or can they be retrofitted to an aircraft? There's a ****load of stuff that makes up an autopilot, apparently. It's not just a control in front of you, there's all sorts of other junk scattered round the plane.. The plane has no "off" switch for the autopilot because it was certified as "full time". There is a red interrupt button on the yoke but the second you release it, the autopilot is back in control. Some pilots put rubber bands on the button to hold it down when they don't want it. I don't like that idea at all. Even airliners have positive disconnects for the autopilot. It does sound a bit strange, but as far as I am concerned you would have to experience it to actually judge that. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Nielsen writes:
Why?? What difference does it make? You never know when having something to fly the plane for you for a few minutes (or longer) might come in handy. Additionally, on trips of any length, I'm pretty sure I'd get very tired of holding the controls all the time. For IFR flights, especially alone, an autopilot would be invaluable. It would also be extremely useful in congested airspace when there are many other things to do besides flying the plane. At least that's how I see it. I like to have lots of options. It does sound a bit strange, but as far as I am concerned you would have to experience it to actually judge that. Mooney aircraft seem to be unusual in many respects. Their Web site makes them look like they build racing aircraft. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... You never know when having something to fly the plane for you for a few minutes (or longer) might come in handy. Additionally, on trips of any length, I'm pretty sure I'd get very tired of holding the controls all the time. Just demonstrates how little you know. Maybe you should actually try flying an airplane sometime. For IFR flights, especially alone, an autopilot would be invaluable. It would also be extremely useful in congested airspace when there are many other things to do besides flying the plane. Na, do that at home before you leave. Not the right group to give pointers on that subject anyway. At least that's how I see it. I like to have lots of options. More like a lot of strange ideas. It does sound a bit strange, but as far as I am concerned you would have to experience it to actually judge that. It's usually best if you experience most anything before you judge it. Odd concept to you I'm sure, but someday you might grow up and find it to be true. Mooney aircraft seem to be unusual in many respects. Their Web site makes them look like they build racing aircraft. You seem to be unusual in every respect. I hear your website makes you like like an absolute dope. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Chris Nielsen writes: Why?? What difference does it make? You never know when having something to fly the plane for you for a few minutes (or longer) might come in handy. You don;t fly fjukkwit. Therefore you are talking out of your ass. And they';re called airplanes, retard. Bertie Berti e |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 7:18 am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Chris Nielsen writes: Why?? What difference does it make? You never know when having something to fly the plane for you for a few minutes (or longer) might come in handy. Additionally, on trips of any length, I'm pretty sure I'd get very tired of holding the controls all the time. For IFR flights, especially alone, an autopilot would be invaluable. It would also be extremely useful in congested airspace when there are many other things to do besides flying the plane. At least that's how I see it. I like to have lots of options. Well I don't know **** about IFR and don't claim to. Autopilot for a small plane VFR, i.e. Warrior, is just about pointless for short trips at least. Yeah, it's nice to be able to hold heading but you still got to keep the bug in the right place so it flies where you want. And you gotta trim it up nicely before engaging it or you end up with a constant bank. And you got to maintain your altitude yourself. On the Archers I have flown it takes so long to get the thing trimmed up nicely, especially elevator trim, that for a short trip it's more trouble than it's worth. I did a couple of 300nm trips recently in a 172 without autopilot or rudder trim and found I didn't miss the autopilot one little bit. Missed the rudder trim though, especially since it was 180hp and whenever you had a high cruise power setting you had to hold constant pressure on the rudder. And the ball on 172s swings from side to side in turbulence, I've found, so it makes it harder to know how much rudder to hold. Oh, and the because of uneven loading (me sitting on one side) it was leaning to one side the whole trip - had to hold right aileron the whole way. Autopilot would not have helped me very much. It does sound a bit strange, but as far as I am concerned you would have to experience it to actually judge that. Mooney aircraft seem to be unusual in many respects. Their Web site makes them look like they build racing aircraft. They're known for being fast, that's for sure |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: You never know when having something to fly the plane for you for a few minutes (or longer) might come in handy. Additionally, on trips of any length, I'm pretty sure I'd get very tired of holding the controls all the time. It's *usually* not that bad. In good weather, with fairly stable air, it's less effort than driving a car for hours on end - much less. And frankly, the little extra work of controlling the yoke helps keep you awake on long flights. [The danger is not so much actually falling asleep, as getting into the flight equivalent of "highway hypnosis."] For IFR flights, especially alone, an autopilot would be invaluable. It would also be extremely useful in congested airspace when there are many other things to do besides flying the plane. Very true. While the pilot should ALWAYS be able to complete the flight flying manually, a working autopilot on a single-pilot IFR flight can be a BIG work saver. There is a lot of other things to do in the cockpit: Charts to find and unfold/fold, approach plates to brief, fixes and routing changes to study, radios and instruments to adjust,... and of course on long flights, lunch! An autopilot, even a simple wing leveler or another set of hands to find or hold stuff for you, can really make life better. Mooney aircraft seem to be unusual in many respects. Their Web site makes them look like they build racing aircraft. Traditionally they built fast aircraft for the power. Not the fastest airplanes in the air, but certainly the fastest on the fuel flow. Now days they have gotten a bit away from that and are pushing higher powered turbocharged models. They are still among the most efficient production aircraft. Their full-time wing-leveler autopilot (standard equipment) was, for years, touted as a significant safety feature. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1300 Koenig Lane West fax 512-371-5716 Suite 200 Austin, Tx 78756 ----------------------------------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Various flying and training questions (small aircraft) | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 6 | March 7th 07 05:33 AM |
Common instruments on small aircraft | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 245 | November 2nd 06 07:57 PM |
Floats on small aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 18 | February 15th 06 11:19 AM |
small partnership questions | TTA Cherokee Driver | Owning | 13 | August 28th 04 04:26 PM |
Small arms locker questions | Red | Naval Aviation | 4 | July 30th 03 02:10 PM |