![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not cost. It's something else. A general change in society is more
likely. How many people have spent beyond their means compared to 1970? Are people less interested in doing an activity that takes months of preparation and has limited utility? I honestly don't think cost is any more of a factor today than it was in 1970 - and in real terms, people are better off, too. A thought: The "Depression" generation is now mostly gone. *Those* people knew what true hardship was, understood the value of a dollar, and (if they were like my parents) absolutely feared going into debt. My parents would eat dirt before borrowing money, after living through the hardships of the 1930s. They managed to instill that same fear in me -- but I suspect that attitude has been diluted over time, thus explaining the huge debt loads so many people are now comfortable bearing. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... It's not cost. It's something else. A general change in society is more likely. How many people have spent beyond their means compared to 1970? Are people less interested in doing an activity that takes months of preparation and has limited utility? I honestly don't think cost is any more of a factor today than it was in 1970 - and in real terms, people are better off, too. A thought: The "Depression" generation is now mostly gone. *Those* people knew what true hardship was, understood the value of a dollar, and (if they were like my parents) absolutely feared going into debt. My parents would eat dirt before borrowing money, after living through the hardships of the 1930s. They managed to instill that same fear in me -- but I suspect that attitude has been diluted over time, thus explaining the huge debt loads so many people are now comfortable bearing. Kind of makes you wonder how much the average family was paying in interest in 1965 as compared to today, even with inflation. Most people I know have to be spending enough on just interest every month, to fly several hours. Also, we talk about cell phones, computers, cable TV, home theater, etc., and their cost to the average budget. But consider the accessories the average pilot considers a must today as well. When I started flying in 1970, most of us carried a rotary flight computer, plotter, log book, fuel tester and maybe flash light. Today we feel we have to have hand held GPS, electronic flight computers, lap desks, noise canceling head phones, intercom systems,etc, etc, etc. Flying still doesn't have to be as expensive as many of us make it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
It's not cost. It's something else. A general change in society is more likely. I can spend my spare time getting a pilot certificate or spend my spare time reading Usenet and browsing the Internet. ;-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith wrote:
It's not cost. It's something else. A general change in society is more likely. I think you are right. It is the lack of willingness to take part in anything that doesn't lead to immediate satisfaction. I know that when I started building my own plane the only thing that shocked people as much as the idea of building a plane is that I would invest the multiple years required to do it. Since there has been talk of having to give up things in order to fly I did. I gave up one thing to build my plane. I suspended my Country Club membership and stopped playing golf. What I spent on golf and CC membership and its associated costs has paid for my 601XL to be built. When I get finished with the plane I might take golf up again but I probably won't reactivate my membership. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|