![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snowbird,
- Landing clearance simply omitted. (should result in go-around) Actually, that should result in "xxx tower, please verify N12345 is cleared to land/option/t&g" in due time in the pattern. And the deeper learning point in this is: "You are the pilot in command, assert yourself and your needs on the radio. Don't wait for them to hand down the manna (aka clearance) from the heavens, ask for clarification before things become a problem." - Low fly-by to enable tower to inspect a/c (with binoculars) for possible landing gear defect. I have never understood the usefulness of that particular maneuver (sp?). First, what's the likelyhood of the tower people knowing the slightest thing about landing gear and the specifics of the plane flying by? And second, how would they see from a flyby whether the gear is locked down or just looks locked down? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote - Landing clearance simply omitted. (should result in go-around) Actually, that should result in "xxx tower, please verify N12345 is cleared to land/option/t&g" in due time in the pattern. Agreed. However, in this case, as far as I remember, the tower frequency was so busy that the landing a/c simply did not get a chance to transmit. Normally, a "N12345 on short final" also usually works. - Low fly-by to enable tower to inspect a/c (with binoculars) for possible landing gear defect. I have never understood the usefulness of that particular maneuver (sp?). First, what's the likelyhood of the tower people knowing the slightest thing about landing gear and the specifics of the plane flying by? We had a situation at the local airport where one main wheel fell off on take-off and remained dangling from the brake line. I'd guess the tower was able to brief the pilot about the airplane's condition better than the pilot himself was able to. Whether it made any difference or not, I'm not sure. (The landing went without any major damage.) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 6:56 am, "David Wright"
wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/6294778.stm Interesting that a "Go Around" is considered here as an "unfamiliar manoeuvre" - and that the pilot was "put in a situation beyond his experience" - okay he only had 15 hours of flying time and it was only his second solo, but I was doing touch and go's and going around from about my third hour onwards. D. A student pilot I know (no, not me. I haven't even been up in the left seat yet) was at the controls for a prop strike because they didn't know how to "go around." The instructor had neglected to teach the procedure and when the pilot-in-training realized they were short they just pushed the throttle back in to normal cruise setting instead of full power. Since the instructor thought the pilot was going to full power when he realized the pilot didn't it was too late and the plane hit 100' short of the runway. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Safety pilot "flight time" | kevmor | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | January 30th 07 07:03 PM |
Old polish aircraft TS-8 "Bies" ("Bogy") - for sale | >pk | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 16th 06 07:48 AM |
Aviation Accident - No "Excellent Pilot" Mention | Judah | Piloting | 3 | February 7th 06 09:53 PM |