![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another aspect of the issue is painting things in the engine
compartment: http://www.sacskyranch.com/paint.htm This source concurs with an earlier poster in stating that it matters whether the object is warmer or colder than its surroundings. The author also points out that what the paint is made of matters: since most of the energy transfer at temperatures we're interested in occurs via conduction a paint's insulating properties may be more important than its color, especially for outward energy transfer, where there's almost no reflection of radiation at the component/paint interface. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony writes:
Your assumption is that solar heating is a factor. If the aerodynamic heating is high, one could argue radiative heat transfer would be enhanced with black body radiation. The SR 71 is, you might notice, black, but that may be the result of long wavelength (longer than optical at least) absorbance considrations. I seem to recall that one reason for painting the SR-71 black was indeed to improve heat radiation, but I'm not sure. However the flight envelope of the SR-71 is quite different from that of an ordinary jet (and even more so from a small piston aircraft). Aerodynamic heating might raise the temperature of an ordinary jet by tens of degrees, whereas in the SR-71 it raises it by hundreds of degrees, AFAICR. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
I thought black increased surface temperature? When it absorbs radiation, yes, it does. When it radiates radiation, it lowers temperature. A black-painted object is an approximation of a blackbody, a theoretical object in physics that absorbs all radiation hitting it. A blackbody can emit any radiation it can absorb, and since it absorbs all wavelengths, it emits all wavelengths. So a black airplane can be heating by solar radiation hitting it, but it can also radiate heat to outer space with greater efficiency. If the primary source of heating is solar radiation, as it may well be with ordinary aircraft, a light color will keep the aircraft cooler. If the primary source of heating is aerodynamic friction, as it might be with a very high-speed aircraft, a dark color will help radiate that heat away from the aircraft. Astronauts always wear white because it keeps temperature more even. The white color reflects sunlight, reducing direct heating by sunlight; and the white color also radiates heat poorly, keeping the part of the astronaut that's in the shade a bit warmer. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My Mooney was orange and white. The white on top of fuselage helped keep cabin temp down on the ramp in the summer and the combination was easy to see in the air and also in summer vegetation (a la Faccett) and winter snow if bird went down. Combination looked good like and airplane should, so best of all worlds. Big John ************************************************** ******* On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 17:35:15 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Jay Honeck wrote in news:1194095788.943020.167300 : My daughter innocently asked that question the other day, and I gave her the usual "because white reflects heat better" answer -- but that really doesn't add up, does it? Automobiles, motorcycles, boats -- you name it -- all come in a rainbow of colors. Why are 99.5% of all planes (except for some cool old classics and some neat homebuilts) white? -- My last one wasn't and my next one won't be.. Bertie |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mx, who earlier wrote
Jay Honeck writes: My daughter innocently asked that question the other day, and I gave her the usual "because white reflects heat better" answer -- but that really doesn't add up, does it? Actually it does, at least for high-speed aircraft. They are already heated externally by aerodynamic friction, and letting the sun beat down on them at high altitude with a black paint job would only heat them up more. finally got a physics question right. For what it's worth, the radiation transfer depends on the difference of the absolute temperature raised to the 4th power, something like K*(T1^4 -T2^4), where T1 and T2 are the absolute temperatures. Think of T1 as the temperature of the incremental part of the body in question, and T2 some kind of weighed average of the environment it's radiating into. K is a measure of the emmissivity of the bodies -- if the body is black it's higher, so if the airplane is hotter than the radiative ambient you would want it black. By the way, it's worth remembering the radiative ambient is NOT the temperature of the nearby air. Can't believe I remember that stuff! |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote in
: I do believe this thread is getting to be quite colorful. I'd have said off-color... |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 3, 6:41 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jay Honeck writes: My daughter innocently asked that question the other day, and I gave her the usual "because white reflects heat better" answer -- but that really doesn't add up, does it? Actually it does, at least for high-speed aircraft. They are already heated externally by aerodynamic friction, and letting the sun beat down on them at high altitude with a black paint job would only heat them up more. God you're a moron. However, some black liveries are in service, so apparently it's not enough to cause a problem. The old Playboy corporate jet was entirely black, and I think there have been a few others. For small GA aircraft, I can't think of any obvious reason why they should be painted white. Not knowing anything never stopped you mouthing off about it before. Bertie |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 1:49 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jay Honeck writes: I thought black increased surface temperature? When it absorbs radiation, yes, it does. When it radiates radiation, it lowers temperature. A black-painted object is an approximation of a blackbody, a theoretical object in physics that absorbs all radiation hitting it. A blackbody can emit any radiation it can absorb, and since it absorbs all wavelengths, it emits all wavelengths. So a black airplane can be heating by solar radiation hitting it, but it can also radiate heat to outer space with greater efficiency. If the primary source of heating is solar radiation, as it may well be with ordinary aircraft, a light color will keep the aircraft cooler. If the primary source of heating is aerodynamic friction, as it might be with a very high-speed aircraft, a dark color will help radiate that heat away from the aircraft. Astronauts always wear white because it keeps temperature more even. The white color reflects sunlight, reducing direct heating by sunlight; and the white color also radiates heat poorly, keeping the part of the astronaut that's in the shade a bit warmer. God you're an idiot. Bertie |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 1:45 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tony writes: Your assumption is that solar heating is a factor. If the aerodynamic heating is high, one could argue radiative heat transfer would be enhanced with black body radiation. The SR 71 is, you might notice, black, but that may be the result of long wavelength (longer than optical at least) absorbance considrations. I seem to recall that one reason for painting the SR-71 black was indeed to improve heat radiation, Nope; Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does it have to WHITE!!! | firstflight | Home Built | 33 | July 26th 05 06:17 PM |
Why are airplanes white? | gatt | Piloting | 30 | July 21st 04 02:55 PM |
*White* Helicopters??!!! | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 13 | March 9th 04 07:03 PM |
White over white is alright? | Ron Natalie | Piloting | 3 | July 16th 03 05:24 PM |
white lightning | mansour | Home Built | 16 | July 10th 03 08:46 PM |