Yet Another Cirrus SR22 Crash.

Mxsmanic,

Actually, the ephemeral and time-sensitive nature of journalism makes it
possible to earn money with it even in the absence of copyright.


Ah, you're an expert in journalism now, too? Admirable.

There's obviously only one area of expertise you are seriously lacking in:
Recognizing and knowing your limitations. The thing is: This lack
influences all other areas you might know something about.

So STFU AND DON'T TELL ME ABOUT MY JOB, YOU STUPID LOSER!


--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

Gee, Mx is wrong again. Without copyright, a writer -- reporting news
or otherwise -- could have his material taken and used without
compensation in real time. This would have a particular impact on
writers without affiliations, who might be first on scene, dash off a
story, and have it used without getting a penny for their efforts.

Interesting how real world issues somehow escape someone who lives in
a simulated one. We don't get to walk away from real world aftermaths
-- it would be nice to have an alt control delete key sequence on some
of our days.




.. On Dec 3, 11:43 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote :

Thomas Borchert writes:

I'm a journalist. If there was no copyright, I would have no income. If
everybody was infringing on my copyright, I would have no income. Thus,
I have something against copyright infringements in the casual manner
recommended here.

Actually, the ephemeral and time-sensitive nature of journalism makes it
possible to earn money with it even in the absence of copyright. In many
cases, by the time someone infringes, it's old news.

Like you.

Bertie

"Tina" wrote in message
...
Gee, Mx is wrong again. Without copyright, a writer -- reporting news
or otherwise -- could have his material taken and used without
compensation in real time. This would have a particular impact on
writers without affiliations, who might be first on scene, dash off a
story, and have it used without getting a penny for their efforts.

Interesting how real world issues somehow escape someone who lives in
a simulated one. We don't get to walk away from real world aftermaths
-- it would be nice to have an alt control delete key sequence on some
of our days.



He probably spends most of his downtime on Second Life...as a pilot.

Thomas Borchert writes:

So STFU AND DON'T TELL ME ABOUT MY JOB, YOU STUPID LOSER!

Or else what?

Tina writes:

Gee, Mx is wrong again. Without copyright, a writer -- reporting news
or otherwise -- could have his material taken and used without
compensation in real time. This would have a particular impact on
writers without affiliations, who might be first on scene, dash off a
story, and have it used without getting a penny for their efforts.

In modern journalism, the speed with which you get the news to the audience is
often much more important than anything having to do with copyright. No
matter how fast the copycats are, the original writer is always the first to
have the news he has written, and that is a tremendous and usually overriding
advantage in high-speed journalism.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Thomas Borchert writes:

So STFU AND DON'T TELL ME ABOUT MY JOB, YOU STUPID LOSER!

Or else what?

He will continue with his life...which you don't have.

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

He will continue with his life...which you don't have.

So he will not continue with his life if I don't?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

He will continue with his life...which you don't have.

So he will not continue with his life if I don't?

You won't continue with your life because you can't, you don't have one.

Mx's statement has nothing to do with defending his position or
countering what I said.

One would think by the some cosmic force he would take a supportable
and defendable posiiton sometimes -- the conclusion I've reached is he
carefully takes wrong ones.

Keep your children from playing flight simulation games on computer --
we have some evidence it makes them stupid.


.. On Dec 4, 1:31 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
Gee, Mx is wrong again. Without copyright, a writer -- reporting news
or otherwise -- could have his material taken and used without
compensation in real time. This would have a particular impact on
writers without affiliations, who might be first on scene, dash off a
story, and have it used without getting a penny for their efforts.

In modern journalism, the speed with which you get the news to the audience is
often much more important than anything having to do with copyright. No
matter how fast the copycats are, the original writer is always the first to
have the news he has written, and that is a tremendous and usually overriding
advantage in high-speed journalism.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

He will continue with his life...which you don't have.

So he will not continue with his life if I don't?


Damn, you are numb from neck up.