A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

747 flights with the USA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old January 27th 08, 08:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Benjamin Dover
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 292
Default 747 flights with the USA

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

John writes:

You came in here to ask a question and MX posted a response. You
would have no way of knowing he was clueless and you might have left
believing him.


Which would be a good thing, since the response I gave was succinct,
correct, and useful.


Slither, slither, slither.

Your answer was pure bull ****, as usual.

You don't fly. You don't know **** about aviation. All you do is
play with MSFS while stroking your joy stick.

  #42  
Old January 27th 08, 09:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Rich Ahrens[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 404
Default 747 flights with the USA

Ted wrote:
If you would have read everyone's post to this, you would have already have
had the answer. That's "What the hell" happened to the constraint.


Hey, schmuck, you really don't know much about Usenet, do you? Posts
arrive at different servers in different order, often with random
delays. Furthermore, many people read them in threaded order, not
chronological order. As of the time of my question and again at the time
of this response, there is still no post on my server that answers the
question.

You also added, "I quess I should have been more specific...I mean 747
flights within the CONTINENTAL USA....and I'm everyone one understood
what I meant," which is not met by the Vancouver-JFK route either.
Unless we're to understand you're the sort of moron who believes British
Columbia to be part of the USA.

You're making quite a splash here, starting with wandering in and asking
a question off topic for rec.aviation.piloting in the first place. Keep
it up and you'll find yourself getting the full treatment.
  #43  
Old January 27th 08, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ted[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default 747 flights with the USA

Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read
the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a
rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or
whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I
know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A
MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA
borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP
WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK??????


"Rich Ahrens" wrote in message
. net...
Ted wrote:
If you would have read everyone's post to this, you would have already
have had the answer. That's "What the hell" happened to the constraint.


Hey, schmuck, you really don't know much about Usenet, do you? Posts
arrive at different servers in different order, often with random delays.
Furthermore, many people read them in threaded order, not chronological
order. As of the time of my question and again at the time of this
response, there is still no post on my server that answers the question.

You also added, "I quess I should have been more specific...I mean 747
flights within the CONTINENTAL USA....and I'm everyone one understood what
I meant," which is not met by the Vancouver-JFK route either. Unless we're
to understand you're the sort of moron who believes British Columbia to be
part of the USA.

You're making quite a splash here, starting with wandering in and asking a
question off topic for rec.aviation.piloting in the first place. Keep it
up and you'll find yourself getting the full treatment.



  #44  
Old January 27th 08, 09:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default 747 flights with the USA

"Ted" TBBlakeley@comcastDOTnet wrote in
:

Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have
read the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have
posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to
go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on
yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in the
USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go
what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and yet
YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU
REALLY EVEN THINK??????



Whoowh. Ted.



That's some talent you got there.

Bertie
  #45  
Old January 27th 08, 10:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default 747 flights with the USA

Ted writes:

Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read
the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a
rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or
whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I
know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A
MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA
borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP
WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK??????


Relax. Flames are normal on USENET. Ignore them.
  #46  
Old January 27th 08, 10:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default 747 flights with the USA

Benjamin Dover writes:

You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in
production. That was a flat out lie.


The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a passenger
version, and that version is no longer made. The fact that cargo versions and
BBJs are still made is irrelevant.
  #47  
Old January 27th 08, 10:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default 747 flights with the USA

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Ted writes:

Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have
read the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have
posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to
go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on
yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in
the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go
go what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and
yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU
REALLY EVEN THINK??????


Relax. Flames are normal on USENET. Ignore them.



Bwawahwhahwhhahwhahwhawhahhw!

Normal for you, maybe.


Bertie

  #48  
Old January 27th 08, 11:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_22_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default 747 flights with the USA

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Benjamin Dover writes:

You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in
production. That was a flat out lie.


The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a
passenger version, and that version is no longer made.



Nope.


The fact that
cargo versions and BBJs are still made is irrelevant.


No it isn't, fjukkwit


Bertie
  #49  
Old January 28th 08, 12:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default 747 flights with the USA


"Ted" TBBlakeley@comcastDOTnet wrote in message
. ..
PLEASE accept my apologies for the response that I made to you.....I
certainly didn't want to cause trouble here...for anyone and especially
for ME!!


And please accept my apology, for my snide remarks, initially.

For some reason, I confused you with Ken, and I have no lost love for him,
and his presence here.

Really, I think you will be let down by your flight on a 747. It is longer,
and wider than most airliners, and other than that, feels just the same, as
far as motion, accelerations, and noise. The center section can be a pain,
crawling over people to get out.

Plus that, there is much less chance you will get a window seat, and be able
to see out.

Good luck.
--
Jim in NC


  #50  
Old January 28th 08, 12:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Benjamin Dover
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 292
Default 747 flights with the USA

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Benjamin Dover writes:

You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in
production. That was a flat out lie.


The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a
passenger version, and that version is no longer made. The fact that
cargo versions and BBJs are still made is irrelevant.


Slither. Slither. Slither.

Your statement was not qualified. It simply said that the 747 was no
longer in production. Patently false.

Slither. Slither. Slither

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No OLC flights? Bill Daniels Soaring 4 July 5th 07 02:38 AM
cheap air flights [email protected] Owning 0 January 19th 06 02:12 AM
Zero-G flights in FL Ross Oliver Piloting 4 September 20th 04 06:46 PM
P47 flights Regnirps Military Aviation 0 May 29th 04 04:15 AM
how I map my flights Snowbird Instrument Flight Rules 10 November 30th 03 11:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.