![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: John writes: You came in here to ask a question and MX posted a response. You would have no way of knowing he was clueless and you might have left believing him. Which would be a good thing, since the response I gave was succinct, correct, and useful. Slither, slither, slither. Your answer was pure bull ****, as usual. You don't fly. You don't know **** about aviation. All you do is play with MSFS while stroking your joy stick. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted wrote:
If you would have read everyone's post to this, you would have already have had the answer. That's "What the hell" happened to the constraint. Hey, schmuck, you really don't know much about Usenet, do you? Posts arrive at different servers in different order, often with random delays. Furthermore, many people read them in threaded order, not chronological order. As of the time of my question and again at the time of this response, there is still no post on my server that answers the question. You also added, "I quess I should have been more specific...I mean 747 flights within the CONTINENTAL USA....and I'm everyone one understood what I meant," which is not met by the Vancouver-JFK route either. Unless we're to understand you're the sort of moron who believes British Columbia to be part of the USA. You're making quite a splash here, starting with wandering in and asking a question off topic for rec.aviation.piloting in the first place. Keep it up and you'll find yourself getting the full treatment. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read
the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK?????? "Rich Ahrens" wrote in message . net... Ted wrote: If you would have read everyone's post to this, you would have already have had the answer. That's "What the hell" happened to the constraint. Hey, schmuck, you really don't know much about Usenet, do you? Posts arrive at different servers in different order, often with random delays. Furthermore, many people read them in threaded order, not chronological order. As of the time of my question and again at the time of this response, there is still no post on my server that answers the question. You also added, "I quess I should have been more specific...I mean 747 flights within the CONTINENTAL USA....and I'm everyone one understood what I meant," which is not met by the Vancouver-JFK route either. Unless we're to understand you're the sort of moron who believes British Columbia to be part of the USA. You're making quite a splash here, starting with wandering in and asking a question off topic for rec.aviation.piloting in the first place. Keep it up and you'll find yourself getting the full treatment. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ted" TBBlakeley@comcastDOTnet wrote in
: Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK?????? Whoowh. Ted. That's some talent you got there. Bertie |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted writes:
Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK?????? Relax. Flames are normal on USENET. Ignore them. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benjamin Dover writes:
You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in production. That was a flat out lie. The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a passenger version, and that version is no longer made. The fact that cargo versions and BBJs are still made is irrelevant. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Ted writes: Hey, you're a real mature one here...like I stated...you should have read the post that were already here...that way you wouldn't have posted such a rediculous posting even after you're the one telling to go to Asia or whatever. ( and you say I'm not keeping it on yopic???!!!).....trust me, I know my geography...I know what is in the USA or not..YOU REALLY ARE A MORONIC SCHMUCK!!!! Yea, I did go go what, 30 miles outside of the USA borders to get on a 747.....and yet YOU suggest I go to ASIA??? WHAT IS UP WITH THAT????!!!! DO YOU REALLY EVEN THINK?????? Relax. Flames are normal on USENET. Ignore them. Bwawahwhahwhhahwhahwhawhahhw! Normal for you, maybe. Bertie |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Benjamin Dover writes: You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in production. That was a flat out lie. The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a passenger version, and that version is no longer made. Nope. The fact that cargo versions and BBJs are still made is irrelevant. No it isn't, fjukkwit Bertie |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ted" TBBlakeley@comcastDOTnet wrote in message . .. PLEASE accept my apologies for the response that I made to you.....I certainly didn't want to cause trouble here...for anyone and especially for ME!! And please accept my apology, for my snide remarks, initially. For some reason, I confused you with Ken, and I have no lost love for him, and his presence here. Really, I think you will be let down by your flight on a 747. It is longer, and wider than most airliners, and other than that, feels just the same, as far as motion, accelerations, and noise. The center section can be a pain, crawling over people to get out. Plus that, there is much less chance you will get a window seat, and be able to see out. Good luck. -- Jim in NC |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Benjamin Dover writes: You made the statement that Boeing no longer has the 747 in production. That was a flat out lie. The only 747 that the original poster is likely to ride in is a passenger version, and that version is no longer made. The fact that cargo versions and BBJs are still made is irrelevant. Slither. Slither. Slither. Your statement was not qualified. It simply said that the 747 was no longer in production. Patently false. Slither. Slither. Slither |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No OLC flights? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 4 | July 5th 07 02:38 AM |
cheap air flights | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | January 19th 06 02:12 AM |
Zero-G flights in FL | Ross Oliver | Piloting | 4 | September 20th 04 06:46 PM |
P47 flights | Regnirps | Military Aviation | 0 | May 29th 04 04:15 AM |
how I map my flights | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | November 30th 03 11:26 PM |