If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#561
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Rasimus wrote:
Trust me, they wouldn't be able to spin the T-38. I guess the IP demo was done so they could accurately perform the demo? Got a book review brief on your book today Ed (yes,yes I'm going to get it!). Only critique was that you used too much jargon. The review was done by a Comm officer. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#562
|
|||
|
|||
They do. My next door neighbor flew T-38Cs in SUPT and absolutely loved
the glass cockpit. Michael Kelly Bone Maintainer BUFDRVR wrote: Mary wrote: Does the T-38 glass cockpit have a HUD? Hmm, good question, I know the T-38Cs headed for IFF do, but I'm not sure about the SUPT T-38s? BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#563
|
|||
|
|||
Bush Flew Fighter Jets During Vietnam wrote:
But I'd like you to provide a quote that the NYT said what you suggest. "The NYT said what I suggest." -- Charlie Springer So you don't have a source. You asked for quote so I quoted myself. It happens to be true. -- Charlie Springer |
#564
|
|||
|
|||
|
#566
|
|||
|
|||
"Brett" wrote in message ...
"George Z. Bush" wrote: ... in my day the law didn't require you to register if you had volunteered and were waiting for your reporting date. It did, You sure about htat? you didn't have to register between 1975 until 1980, when Jimmy Carter got concerned about the Soviet's in Afghanistan. I believe that is true also. -- FF |
#567
|
|||
|
|||
|
#568
|
|||
|
|||
"George Z. Bush" wrote in message ...
"WalterM140" wrote in message ... Would this be the Senate that contained something like 45-50 Democrats? None of whome could be inveigled into signing on? Yeah, that's weird, isn't it? Tom Dashchle (sp) directed that no senator sign. Walt What are we talking about? It'd be nice if enough of the original topic had been retained so that we wouldn't have to ask. George Z. Sorry. the subject was the certification of Florida electors in 2000. Walt So, the comment about Daschle would have referred to something like what Denny Hastert did with the discharge petition for the vote on concurrent receipt which got only ONE Republican vote from the entire House? Or doesn't one size fit all when it comes to politics.....nasty when the Dems do it in the Senate, but OK when the Repubs do it in the House? Sounds like a case of the whines to me. What are you talking about? -- FF |
#569
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Cook" wrote in message m...
Yes, they could have challenged, but would have lost. With the make up of Congress, and the Electoral Count Act of 1887, only the candidate who held state certification would win this type of challenge. Of course, Bush held state certification as a result of the remedy crafted by the Democrat majority of the Florida Supreme Court (Palm Beach County Canvassing Board vs. Harris). Instead of ordering a full recount, the court decided that state certification would be awarded to the winner of 4 Democrat majority county recount. As I recall, the second FLSC decision that was appealed to the USSC required that all undervoted ballots through out the state of FL be recounted by hand using the standard for interpretation established in FL election law: 'the clear intent of the voter'. This was the decision that was first stayed, and later overturned by the USSC. "Rougher translation: We're giving you a chance to explain your way out of the federal law trap into which you stumbled on Nov. 21. But we don't see how you can do it. And by the way, it isn't only us that you have to convince. Under another provision of that 1887 act (3 U.S.C. section 15), the Bush electors that Gov. Jeb Bush has already certified and sent to Congress, via the archivist of the United States, will be the ones counted, unless any Gore electors approved by the Florida courts can pass muster with both the Republican-controlled House and the Senate. Not much chance of that." http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...2000-12-13.htm This article concerns the first ruling of the FLSC which was appealed to the USSC, not the second, which I think is the one Walt was writing about. -- FF |
#570
|
|||
|
|||
On 21 Jul 2004 13:30:09 -0700, (Fred the Red
Shirt) wrote: "Brett" wrote in message ... "George Z. Bush" wrote: ... in my day the law didn't require you to register if you had volunteered and were waiting for your reporting date. It did, You sure about htat? you didn't have to register between 1975 until 1980, when Jimmy Carter got concerned about the Soviet's in Afghanistan. I believe that is true also. The law has always required males to register (since the original establishment of selective service.) If you were in the DEP or awaiting a training date you reported that as well and were immediately recategorized. Males still have to register on their 18th birthday. The registration requirement was suspended from 1975 to 1980, but that's the only time. Lots of info at http://www.sss.gov/Default.htm Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |