If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Peter,
The only thing that makes me think is the very huge quantity of low time cirrus airplanes on the market, several mods in the meantime, complaints about many problems and so on. Well, then think about the number of ADs that have come out for new-generation Cessnas compared to the Cirrus or the Diamond, too. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... ...snip... One of the troubles with carbon fiber is it if it is over-stressed, it doesn't just gradually crystallize and develop cracks the way metal does. It fails suddenly and spectacularly. ...snip... I think bicycles are pointing the direction to the future of aircraft. I think we may eventually see aircraft made of titanium (the stuff is not rare, just difficult to work with) and beryllium/aluminum alloys. You can get bicycles made of these materials today, and they are proving their worth, though I will probably stick with carbon fiber. Although the necessity of "light and strong" is obvious, the "energy dissipation" quality of crumpling aluminum and "standard" metals is also useful in light GA aircraft, where survivable crashes are common. If we make stuff too strong (titanium and carbon fiber) do we risk that it would lead to fewer GA accidents being survivable?? You will never see a serious fiberglass bicycle, which is even more dependent than an airplane on strength and lightness. Fiberglass is for cheap boats, not airplanes or bicycles. I couldn't agree more! |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote: First of all, I am not interested in running an anti-Cirrus campaign. Bwaw-haw-haw! You could have fooled us! Is that why you only cross-posted to four groups? If you keep grinding this axe, you won't have anything left but the handle. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Thomas,
(just why did I know ...) The only thing that makes me think is the very huge quantity of low time cirrus airplanes on the market, several mods in the meantime, complaints about many problems and so on. Well, then think about the number of ADs that have come out for new-generation Cessnas compared to the Cirrus or the Diamond, too. I do. And I do think about the 'accidents' of both types since restart of Cessna's production and the emerging of Cirrus. If compared, the ADs for the 182 on the one side and the ADs and problems of the Cirrus show a clear difference: On the one side a many years old design of a 'rugged-and-reliable' spam can with a few minor problems due to redesigns and on the other side a totally new design with some real problems. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that the Cirrus is faulty or bad. Just that it's ones own decission if you want to use a _very_ proven design (with the downside of 'age') or a brand new design with many (nice?) surprises in the first 5-10 years. Call me conservative Peter |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
What a load of BS. Have either of you guys ever seen or flown a high
performance sailplane? Where *only* airframe performance counts - aircraft use composite construction. Anybody heard of Rutan? You guys sound like Ford defending the Lizzy. Best way to towards industrial obsolescence is putting your head in the ground while the world flies past. That sound you hear is credibility leaking away at a high rate of speed. "Icebound" "C J Campbell" ...snip... One of the troubles with carbon fiber is it if it is over-stressed, it doesn't just gradually crystallize and develop cracks the way metal does. It fails suddenly and spectacularly. ...snip... I think bicycles are pointing the direction to the future of aircraft. I think we may eventually see aircraft made of titanium (the stuff is not rare, just difficult to work with) and beryllium/aluminum alloys. You can get bicycles made of these materials today, and they are proving their worth, though I will probably stick with carbon fiber. Although the necessity of "light and strong" is obvious, the "energy dissipation" quality of crumpling aluminum and "standard" metals is also useful in light GA aircraft, where survivable crashes are common. If we make stuff too strong (titanium and carbon fiber) do we risk that it would lead to fewer GA accidents being survivable?? You will never see a serious fiberglass bicycle, which is even more dependent than an airplane on strength and lightness. Fiberglass is for cheap boats, not airplanes or bicycles. I couldn't agree more! |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Maule Driver" wrote in message .com... What a load of BS. Have either of you guys ever seen or flown a high performance sailplane? Where *only* airframe performance counts - aircraft use composite construction. Anybody heard of Rutan? Composites, sure. But fiberglass specifically, well..... Rutan's designs, such as the round-the-world Voyager, or Adam Aircraft's A500... were done in carbon fiber and kevlar.... was there very much fiberglass involved? As for the obsolescence of aluminum, especially in alloy, try the "Centennial of Flight" Commission: http://www.centennialofflight.gov/es...tes/Tech40.htm |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
I am not too sure that there has been too much design in aircraft that
utilizes the crumple capabilities of metal. Even in the metal planes. At least the GA planes. The likely accidents are much different than in cars, and I am not sure that you have the weight available to really play with crumple zones. Sure, you would want to ensure that the wings will shear off at a certain amount of force, and that the engine will not go straight back into the cockpit. Other than that, where would you go for a crumple rather than a solid resistance? Also, the likely bounce is much different in a plane than a car. This would make a neat new thread. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
C,
You will never see a serious fiberglass bicycle, which is even more dependent than an airplane on strength and lightness. Fiberglass is for cheap boats, not airplanes or bicycles. There are comparisons that make sense. Then there are comparisons that are total BS. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Ryan, hey can be summed up in three words: TCM, network, and MCU. Could you explain a little more, please? TCM: I think Continental's quality of materials and construction is poor these days (see Deakin's comments on TCM at AVWeb) and I would have vastly preferred a Lycoming powerplant in the Cirrus. The current engine is a operating expense and safety liability in an otherwise well-thought out airplane. The TBO talk of 1,700 vs. 2,000 is largely moot because the engine is not likely to make it past 800-1000 hours without being topped no matter how it's operated. Network: Components by Emax, Avidyne, Garmin, S-TEC, and L-3 all communicate together via ethernet. A piece of garbage occasionally appears in the data stream and causes problems - for example, the altitude preselect may stop functioning mid-flight, or the autopilot may stop receiving course or heading signals from the PFD. These problems are transitory and impossible to troubleshoot. The solution is to integrate, which is what Garmin is promising with the G-1000. Garmin is also building their own autopilot, which will obviously be designed to seamlessly integrate with the G-1000. A/P integration was one of the key goals of the Garmin design team, according the G-1000 product manager when I spoke with him after a presentation on the G-1000. MCU: The Master Control Unit provides electrical services such as voltage regulation and overvoltage protection, etc. It's mounted on the left side of the firewall in the engine compartment. Oddly, it is a single point of failure across both alternators. A failure of the MCU makes the all-electric SR-22 a battery-powered airplane in a heartbeat. This is supposed to be a rare event, but we've replaced two MCUs in one of our SR-22s already. Another common misunderstanding is that the airplane "can't" recover from spins with CAPS. According to Cirrus' test pilots, the airplane recovers from spins via conventional recovery techniques. The latest iteration of the SR-22 and SR-20 POH indicates the proper recovery method is to first try the conventional PARE technique, and if not effective, to activate CAPS. Spin certification compliance via CAPS was simply a matter of saving money to certify the airplane. I don't suggest that the airplane can or should be spun, but from what I've heard directly from the horse's mouth, spin avoidance and recovery are no more an issue in the Cirrus than any other single-engine airplane. -Ryan |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Ryan,
very interesting, thanks. IMHO, it's a matter of time until Cirrus switches to the G1000, just like they switched from Arnav to Avidyne. The integration really makes sense. Maybe they're waiting for the autopilot... As for TCM, here in Europe, many people, myself included, are really waiting for a diesel to be integrated into the Cirrus. The way Cirrus tells it, the SMA installation is full of problems which need solving by SMA, not Cirrus. Not much movement there. OTOH, the small Thielert doesn't have enough power. The big Thielert, scheduled for 2006, is too big and heavy. So the only hope from my view is the 6-cylinder 200+ HP Thielert, which will probably take until close to the end of the decade to be fully certified and integrated. Oh well... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Cessna 140 wheel pants aluminum | Mark T. | Home Built | 0 | September 9th 04 12:19 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 04:53 AM |
Cessna Steel Landing Gears, J-3 Seat Sling For Auction | Bill Berle | Home Built | 0 | February 19th 04 06:51 PM |
Cessna wheela and axles | clare @ snyder.on .ca | Home Built | 2 | January 10th 04 04:52 PM |