If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:38:16 -0400, Howard Berkowitz wrote:
In article cb7vc.4394$1L4.671@okepread02, "william cogswell" wrote: writes Hey, once you've gone winchester in the Beagles, do you thing the jets could slice a few of the attacking Japanese planes successfully with midair passes? Don't think so - and you want those Beagles as intact as you can for as long as you can. Be a shame to lose half your force to a golden BB by a determined rear-gunner. -- Well if the nukes weren't disallowed you could use a one or two on the japanese fleet the chase down the the air armada and use one of the remaining nukes in a airburst close aboard I may be getting into sensitive areas of the arming system, but it would sound like a pretty fair navigational challenge to plot the lob-toss delivery such that it detonates on, or at least in front, or a moving formation. At what altitude were the Japanese aircraft? Is there a fusing option for that height? As long as you get it in front of them, however, even if you don't knock anything down -- it's very hard for blind pilots to attack or land. If you drop a bucket o' sunshine on them before they launch, no problem. If the attack is already airborne they are now without a home plate. Not good over the Pacific. Al Minyard |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Paul F Austin
writes 21" torpedo warheads ran around ~800lb of Torpex at the time (UK Mark VIII - 640lb Torpex for the US Mark 14), which sounds competitive for BLU-109/B (if a bit smaller than Mark 84) That said, if you could get an under-keel detonation with any of those, it will *hurt* a ship of that era. You're right about the BLU-109 fill. Thanks for the correction. Thanks for being gracious, I hope I'm as polite when corrected Just an area where I had some figures in mind and others to hand. How does a modern insensitive explosive fill compare to Torpex? Depends on role (and which 'insensitive fill' you mean). Torpedo warheads are typically blast weapons, bombs are more interested in fragmentation, and there are numerous exceptions to both those rules of thumb. 'Torpex' was IIRC distinguished by its aluminium content to enhance blast at the expense of brisance. I'm not a warhead expert, and the best I can do is to suggest that going insensitive cost money but didn't reduce lethality - and that modern explosive fills are both more powerful and more stable than Torpex. I'll stick with my opening gambit - either a 21" torpedo of the period or a modern 2000lb bomb exploding under the keel of a 1941 carrier puts into in that delightful Americanism, "a world of hurt". -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Alan Minyard wrote:
"Paul J. Adam" wrote: In message , Paul F Austin writes 500 pound bombs aren't ship killers for ships that size. 2000 pound bombs may be. After thinking about it, a hard target penetrator fuzed to go off after exiting below the keel may be the most lethal way of attacking large ships. The explosive fill makes a torpedo look small and there's a fair chance of breaking the ship's back. 21" torpedo warheads ran around ~800lb of Torpex at the time (UK Mark VIII - 640lb Torpex for the US Mark 14), which sounds competitive for BLU-109/B (if a bit smaller than Mark 84) That said, if you could get an under-keel detonation with any of those, it will *hurt* a ship of that era. One hit from a US Sub blew the Taiho sky high. The Japanese were notorious for filling their ships with avgas fumes. So were we, at the start of the war. Witness what happened to the Lexington. I vaguely recall reading that the real problem with Japanese ships was that they were using light, sweet crude from the Netherlands East Indies, _unrefined_, as bunker fuel. This stuff would leak all sorts of interesting volatiles around the interior of a ship if an attack broached fuel tanks, and all it took was one spark... -Marc -- Marc Reeve actual email address after removal of 4s & spaces is c4m4r4a4m4a4n a4t c4r4u4z4i4o d4o4t c4o4m |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
WaltBJ wrote:
A series of sonic booms would sure as hell wake up Pearl Harbor. Is a Beagle able to carry Harpoons? BTW I was one surprised 104 driver when my AIM9B growled nice and loud at a C47. Coming in from the portside low it had a good look at #1's exhaust stack. But then it was first conceived as a kamikaze-killer. IIRR, the very first a/c shot down by an AIM-9 in test (by Wally Schirra IIRC) was a Hellcat drone. And all those SAM-7s using uncooled seekers drove the piston-engined O-1s and O-2s (not to mention Spads), up to much higher altitudes in Vietnam in 1972, making their utility as FACs far less. Guy |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete" wrote in message ...
"Paul F Austin" wrote Much too short sighted. You want to kill all of the Japanese CVs. Otherwise, a few hours later, the deck is patched and they're back in operation. A few hours later, you have gone to Pearl, and notified HQ of the deal. Where you are promptly arrested and shipped stateside on charges of impersonating an officer of the US armed forces and for conducting an unauthorised attack on a friendly nation(Japan wasnt at war at the time you stuck the carriers) in an UFO with USAF markings. At the end of the day you receive a letter of reprimend from FDR for wreaking his awesome 'day of infamy' and 'unprovoked attack' speech he was preparing for so long, for just such a day. You go down in history as the mysterious madman who triggered war in the pacific by attacking the peaceful, friendly japanese fleet who had been conducting freedom of navigation excersices in the vicinity. At the worst, all six would be back in business for the battles of 1942. Since the Japanese CVs weren't armored to speak of, a GBU-10 with a Mk-84 warhead should be the basic CV ship-killer. Two F-15Es should nail all six CVs with one bomb per and an extra pair as backup and coup d'gras. I'd nail all CVs and then pull back to maximum endurance loiter and observe Japanese damage control efforts. Remember, 1/2 the attack force is already on the way. You need to slow them down as much as possible. At Bingo, either donate the remaining ordnance to the CVs in best shape or retire to one of the undamaged fields on Oahu and try and talk the duty officer out of twenty thousand pounds of kerosene to go back and finish the job. But that wouldn't be likely to succeed. This is tough, because a single bomb is really marginal against a large ship. Which is why I thought 16 MK-82 vs 8 MK-84. Smaller warhead, yes, but more hits. The real question is, can 2 Strike Eagles sink all 6 carriers? Maybe, maybe not. There are only two of you, with limited ordnance. Slow them down as much as possible until you can shake things up at Pearl. Pete |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
"Tuollaf43" wrote in message om... "Pete" wrote in message ... "Paul F Austin" wrote Much too short sighted. You want to kill all of the Japanese CVs. Otherwise, a few hours later, the deck is patched and they're back in operation. A few hours later, you have gone to Pearl, and notified HQ of the deal. Where you are promptly arrested and shipped stateside on charges of impersonating an officer of the US armed forces and for conducting an unauthorised attack on a friendly nation(Japan wasnt at war at the time you stuck the carriers) in an UFO with USAF markings. Trouble is Japan had just broken off diplomatic relations with the USA and had attacked Wake, the Phillipines and Malaya. You dont think Japan only attacked Pearl Harbor on Dec 7 do you ? At the end of the day you receive a letter of reprimend from FDR for wreaking his awesome 'day of infamy' and 'unprovoked attack' speech he was preparing for so long, for just such a day. You go down in history as the mysterious madman who triggered war in the pacific by attacking the peaceful, friendly japanese fleet who had been conducting freedom of navigation excersices in the vicinity. Actually you get the medal of honor for being the only commander who was on the ball. Short and Kimmel keep their jobs and Douglas McArthur is fired for being unprepared. Keith |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"Tuollaf43" wrote Where you are promptly arrested and shipped stateside on charges of impersonating an officer of the US armed forces and for conducting an unauthorised attack on a friendly nation(Japan wasnt at war at the time you stuck the carriers) in an UFO with USAF markings. At the end of the day you receive a letter of reprimend from FDR for wreaking his awesome 'day of infamy' and 'unprovoked attack' speech he was preparing for so long, for just such a day. You go down in history as the mysterious madman who triggered war in the pacific by attacking the peaceful, friendly japanese fleet who had been conducting freedom of navigation excersices in the vicinity. With 20/20 hindsight, and the means to preventor seriously inhibit the war in the Pacific, I think that's a reprimand I'd take. Again, with 20/20 hindsight, if you could shoot (name your favorite dictator), knowing it would land you in jail, but but also knowing it would prevent X thousand or million deaths, would you do it? I'd like to think I would. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|