A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Greetings from your friendly, neighborhood, TERRORIST!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 28th 04, 06:54 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nomen Nescio ] wrote in
:


Shame people cant have more respect for people that have voulnteered to
fight for our freedoms.

I dont speak to the particulars of this troopers actions but to yours
and your blatent disrespect for him. just because he dosent give a sh*t
about how many log entries you have in your book doesnt mean he dosent
have a job to do.

Maybe we should have him go back to doing the same job he had on sept
10th 2001, sittin at the desk ...I perfer he KEEP doing what he did.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Well, I guess I made the list of suspected terrorists, this weekend.
My wife and I had been hiking in the hills at the foot of the
Berkshires and and when we got back to the car we decided to stop at
Barnes Airport (KBAF) and hang out watching the planes, for a while,
and cool off after the hike. So we parked on the side of the road next
to rnwy 20, sat on the tailgate and sipped on a soda as the planes
came and went, as we have done intermittently for over 3 decades.
After 1/2 hour, a camo Hummer pulled out of the Air National Guard
base (on the other side of the airport) and came toward us. It pulled
up to the fence next to us. G.I. Joe sat there for a minute doing
whatever (chambering a round in his 9mm?), then got out and informed
us that "You can't stay there!". "We're just having a soda and
watching the planes", I said. He repeated "You can't stay there!".
"I've been coming to this spot for over 30 years, damn, 9/11's got you
guys pretty edgy, huh. I'm a pilot and I've flown in here more times
than I can count". "You have to leave, NOW, sir!", he replied sternly.
"Is there any place, around here, where it's OK to sit and watch the
planes?", my wife asked. "Not here.......there's a place to watch the
planes at Bradley" (KBDL....20 miles away, I know the place off rnwy
6......perfect spot to lob a Stinger Missile up the ass of a 747 on
takeoff), "but you can't stay here". Realizing the futility of further
discussion, I said, "OK, we're outta here". I closed up the tailgate
of the Tahoe and he went back to his Hummer. My wife and I climbed in,
and we started driving off. A 1/2 mile down the road my wife says,
"You know, he was taking pictures of you as you were closing the
tailgate". "Oh, ****"
So, now, Folks, .....somewhere in Washington, in some little file,
there are probably twenty seven 8x10 color glossy pictures with
circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining
what each one was, to be used as evidence against me.
The next airline trip should be fun......can you say "Cavity Search"!

Hoping you all stay out of the database.

Later,
Osama Bin Buttf**ked


  #2  
Old September 28th 04, 07:14 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug ) wrote:

Shame people cant have more respect for people that have voulnteered to
fight for our freedoms.

snip

It seems to me that someone, somewhere in the chain of command was
fighting against our freedoms in this particular case.

--
Peter





  #3  
Old September 28th 04, 07:14 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Doug" wrote in message
...
Shame people cant have more respect for people that have voulnteered to
fight for our freedoms.


Respect does not mean blindly obeying. With that respect comes an
expecation that our trust in those people won't be abused. As soon as it is
abused, the respect is no longer deserved.

I dont speak to the particulars of this troopers actions but to yours
and your blatent disrespect for him. just because he dosent give a sh*t
about how many log entries you have in your book doesnt mean he dosent
have a job to do.


He does have a job to do. That job doesn't involve running off people who
are behaving in a perfectly legal manner.

Maybe we should have him go back to doing the same job he had on sept
10th 2001, sittin at the desk ...I perfer he KEEP doing what he did.


Why? How is what he's doing helping anyone? Maybe you'd prefer that we
simply send a law enforcement team to every residence in the US, searching
for evidence of terrorist activities? That would be the most reliable way
of making us safe, after all, right?

Pete


  #4  
Old September 28th 04, 08:09 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Shame people cant have more respect for people that have voulnteered
to fight for our freedoms.


Respect begets respect.

Do you think we should tolerate any level of harrassment arbitrarily forced
upon us the name of freedom?

Talk about irony!



  #5  
Old September 29th 04, 01:10 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I guess I made the list of suspected terrorists, this weekend.

Get on line, and find your elected representatives. Send 'em emails,
outlining this outrageous behavior.

Pick up the phone, and call those stuff shirts. Explain what happened, and
how outraged you are at this particular National Guardsman's actions.

Write letters to the editor. Blast the guy -- and the elected officials, if
they don't respond -- all over the local newspapers.

Got local talk radio? Call in and bitch!

Call the guardsman's commanding officer. They are quite accessible, and
usually quite reasonable. (At least they are around here.)

Don't just sit there and complain to us -- do something that works!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #6  
Old September 29th 04, 01:58 PM
John Harlow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Call the guardsman's commanding officer. They are quite accessible,
and usually quite reasonable. (At least they are around here.)



That would be my first course of action.


  #7  
Old September 29th 04, 04:13 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Next time you go there for a picnic, you might want to take a local
newspaper reporter and a lawyer with you.


  #8  
Old September 30th 04, 03:02 AM
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Was the restaurant open? You could have gone in there. Also, there's a deck
outside the FBO that you probably could have watched from. Just let somebody
in the office know what you're doing. And don't bring any long tubular
objects with you. ;-)

mike regish

p.S. I fly out of Northampton.
"Nomen Nescio" ] wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Well, I guess I made the list of suspected terrorists, this weekend.
My wife and I had been hiking in the hills at the foot of the Berkshires
and
and when we got back to the car we decided to stop at Barnes Airport
(KBAF)
and hang out watching the planes, for a while, and cool off after the
hike. So
we parked on the side of the road next to rnwy 20, sat on the tailgate and
sipped
on a soda as the planes came and went, as we have done intermittently for
over
3 decades. After 1/2 hour, a camo Hummer pulled out of the Air National
Guard
base (on the other side of the airport) and came toward us. It pulled up
to the
fence next to us. G.I. Joe sat there for a minute doing whatever
(chambering a
round in his 9mm?), then got out and informed us that "You can't stay
there!".
"We're just having a soda and watching the planes", I said. He repeated
"You
can't stay there!". "I've been coming to this spot for over 30 years,
damn, 9/11's
got you guys pretty edgy, huh. I'm a pilot and I've flown in here more
times than
I can count". "You have to leave, NOW, sir!", he replied sternly. "Is
there any
place, around here, where it's OK to sit and watch the planes?", my wife
asked.
"Not here.......there's a place to watch the planes at Bradley"
(KBDL....20 miles away,
I know the place off rnwy 6......perfect spot to lob a Stinger Missile up
the ass of
a 747 on takeoff), "but you can't stay here".
Realizing the futility of further discussion, I said, "OK, we're outta
here". I closed up
the tailgate of the Tahoe and he went back to his Hummer. My wife and I
climbed in,
and we started driving off. A 1/2 mile down the road my wife says, "You
know, he was
taking pictures of you as you were closing the tailgate".
"Oh, ****"
So, now, Folks, .....somewhere in Washington, in some little file, there
are probably
twenty seven 8x10 color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a
paragraph
on the back of each one explaining what each one was, to be used as
evidence against
me.
The next airline trip should be fun......can you say "Cavity Search"!

Hoping you all stay out of the database.

Later,
Osama Bin Buttf**ked

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBQViq3ZMoscYxZNI5AQFvSAP+PzQLeqqToOyr3EESDF Q7RV3ct0c44PtQ
4jeBn1ToYEPj9ItyOJ/+f2HmEuMeU53GqY/s0pBDUfBWiCZ2/jfDJxCokk7DqXex
G5sgMnFnBRfjou934D8P9FXXACOggvr6zf9TFBCX8t1Zxv3rEK w5exlex1IKYu5u
ufZqoXqoids=
=L2BM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





  #9  
Old October 3rd 04, 06:12 PM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
In a previous article, "C J Campbell"

said:
You already know how I feel about issues such as posting the ten
commandments, nativity scenes, Stars of David and crosses and the like,

as
well as private schools. You think these things are public imposition

of
religion and are prohibited by the Constitution. I think that

prohibiting
these things violates freedom of worship guaranteed by the

Constitution.
Please do not insult my intelligence by pretending that you do not know

the
issues involved. We may never agree, but don't try to tell me you don't

know
what we are talking about.


I know the ACLU has worked hard and long to keep people like you from
using government organizations, funds, and buildings to impose your
religious beliefs on me and my children. That is not working to

"prohibit
the exercise of freedom of religion". It is working to *strengthen* my
exercise of freedom of religion.

As for ACLU's association with communism, don't be ridiculous. It was
founded by anarchists and communists and continues to be run by them

today.
Some of the very earliest members included Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, who

later
became chairman of the American Communist Party, and Agnes Smedly, a

Soviet
agent. In every single case that I know of where the United States had

a
legal issue with the Kremlin or Castro, the ACLU supported the

communists,
even to the point of forcible repatriation of persons who came here

looking
for political asylum.


So it was founded by people associated with communism. How has it

worked
to "promote communism". Name one concrete thing.

As for "forcible repatriation", the only case I can think you're

thinking
of is Elian Gonzalez, who was kidnapped by a non-parent away from a
parent. That should have been a simple child custody case, and if it
wasn't for the national border nobody would have wasted a second's

thought
on coming to the conclusion that the boy should have been returned to

the
parent.

Saying that the ACLU is neutral on gun control is bogus. If ACLU were
interested in protecting Constitutional rights then they would be in

the
forefront of defending gun owners, especially in states like

Washington,
where Constitutional protections are much stronger than in the US.


That particular constitutional ammendment has a MUCH larger organization
protecting it. Why would the ACLU waste its limited time and resources
protecting the second ammendment when the largest political organization
in the country, the NRA, is already working on the case?


ACLU also continually sides against parents on such issues as birth

control,
sex education, and abortion. Apparently ACLU is able to see a clear


Again, name one case.

ACLU's attack on the Boy Scouts is legendary. Apparently ACLU does not
believe in freedom of association, either, if it involves groups that

it
does not like.


ACLU attempted to prevent the Boy Scouts from discriminating against
people. Hardly an attack.


Except the Boy Scouts is a private organization. Just like there can be no
private censorship under the 1st Amendment (...CONGRESS shall pas no
law...)
the Communists abhor freedom of association (individual rights) over
collectivization.

While I agree CJ is totally off base as regards this version of freedom of
worship, he is correct on his take on the ACLU, who take a very erratic
view
of the Bill of Rights. BTW, the GRU was the group that was fundamental in
founding the ACLU, not to protect freedom of speech (notice they never take
the case of conservatives/free market types at colleges that have speech
codes) but to maintain their propaganda outlets.

By the way, note too that the Communist Party USA endorses Kerry
http://www.cpusa.org




  #10  
Old October 5th 04, 03:47 AM
StellaStar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ACLU, not to protect freedom of speech (notice they never take
the case of conservatives/free market types at colleges that have speech
codes) but to maintain their propaganda outlets.



The ACLU frequently takes the side of conservative and other groups. Free
speech is free speech, as long as it's respectful of others' constitutional
rights.

As for the Boy Scouts, if they had the work ethic of the Girl Scouts, they
wouldn't be in this fix. They take money from civic charities so they must
abide by nondiscrimination rules. If they earned their own funds like the
girls they wouldn't have to.

By the way, note too that the Communist Party USA endorses Kerry
http://www.cpusa.org


No, the party makes clear that it does not endorse candidates.

And Fox news has no respect for you, and less for journalistic ethics than CBS
does.

http://web.morons.org/article.jsp?sectionid=1&id=5607

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Friendly fire" Mike Naval Aviation 3 April 6th 04 06:07 PM
"Friendly fire" Mike Military Aviation 0 March 19th 04 02:36 PM
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death Paul Hirose Military Aviation 0 March 16th 04 12:49 AM
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 18th 03 08:44 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.