If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
I had to quit several times before I finally had the time and money to get
the ticket, but each lapse was heart-rending. I started in the Air Explorers, paying for lessons with a paper route. That was not sustainable while in college -- I managed to log only two hours dual during those years. Later I scraped together $500 for a solo course in gliders, and then couldn't afford to continue after solo. When I finally went out on my own, living near an uncontrolled field and with no real responsibilities, I dove in and got the PP in 41 hours flat (including the time logged in Boy Scouts and college). Built hours flying for CAP. Couldn't afford to buy (and maintain!) my own airplane until after the ex quit spending my money. I introduced one good friend to flying. She immediately dedicated her life to it and within three years was a CFI and owner, with her newly-minted PP husband, of a rag-wing C-170. The important element is passion. Only a small proportion of the population possesses passion for anything, but where it lives you can't hold it back. Seth Comanche N8100R "George Patterson" wrote in message news:qavNe.134$Fq2.14@trndny03... Jay Honeck wrote: That aside, can you name some other reasons for the abysmal drop-out rate of student pilots? I've known three people closely who took lessons and quit. One took an introductory lesson, agreed that the feeling was great, took one look at the bill, and said "maybe after Peter graduates from college." (Peter was at that time about 12). One took one or two lessons and then moved to Vermont -- far enough out that wood is the preferred heating method for the houses in his area. That also involved a job change with lots less money, so flying went back down to a "maybe someday" status item. The third guy took several lessons and was doing pretty well. Then things got a little hectic at work, and he couldn't fly often enough for the lessons to do any good. His wife is also terrified of light aircraft. She was very good (so he says) about not pressuring him to quit, but I'm sure it played some small part. I obtained the AOPA "mentor" packages for all three of these people. I sort of gave up after that. When I was in training myself, two other people at work got their tickets. One later bought a "fixer-upper" of a house. About the same time, a relative left him an old Mercedes. What with fixing those items, he didn't have any time or money to spare on aviation. Last I heard, he doesn't even find flying interesting. The other guy kept studying for his instrument rating. Two years later, he was still studying for his instrument rating. Got married and when the kids started to arrive, he gradually quit flying. Shortly after I got my ticket, a young lady at work expressed an interest in flying, and my boss introduced us. I drove her out to the airport, showed her around, marched her up to the counter, and let them take over from there. When I next asked, she had gone for an eye exam and discovered that she had no depth perception. I could not convince her that it probably wouldn't make a difference in her flying. My personal suspicion is that she was disappointed by the spartan interior of light aircraft (as another poster has mentioned). Basically though, in nearly every case it's lack of time and/or money. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Money is the main reason, but I think that most people who quit start
asking themselves why they are learning to fly in the first place. They begin to get the idea that you can't just get into a plane and go, and the logistical problems of using general aviation for transportation are daunting. A good CFI, of course, will ask those questions before the person even starts, so the best CFIs have lower dropout rates. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
George Patterson wrote:
Got married and when the kids started to arrive, he gradually quit flying. I guess I'm lucky in my timing. My instrument checkride had to be put off as my wife was busy giving birth at the time. A month or so later, I was rated. My more recently arrived son put a real crimp in my commercial training. But to be honest, work pressure's probably done more. On the other hand, I've been a pilot for longer than my youngest has been alive. And all comments about the poor utility of GA as transportation aside, we've managed a number of trips (with our eldest) that would have been tough w/o flying. I also hold out the hope that we'll be doing more and farther as the kids age. If I weren't a pilot yet? I don't know. I like to think it wouldn't make a difference, but...? - Andrew |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" writes:
You'll notice I've not mentioned the Number One reason people mention for quitting: Money. We've beaten the relative cost of flying to death, and (for the purposes of this thread) I will just leave it at this: Learning to fly is about as expensive as a semester of college, and less expensive than buying a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Let's leave "cost" out of this, for now, as I think it's safe to say that there a millions of Americans who could easily afford to learn to fly, if the urge were to strike. I don't really mean to try to drag the discussion back to the cost, because that's something individuals can't do much about. However, your comparison to a Harley is interesting. How many twenty-somethings buy Harley's these days? Aren't they more in the used Honda market? My impression, largely from a few people I know who own Harley's, is that the new sales of those are to older richer people almost exclusively these days. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ Much of which is still down |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
His point is that all people decide to stop progressing at some point. He used Jay as an example of someone who stopped progressing at single engine, fixed gear VFR flying. Others may stop at solo. I don't see much of a difference between stopping at solo or at PP. Well, if you "stop at PP" (as in Jay's case) *he's still flying*. Frequently. If you stop at solo, you're *not* flying any more. That does seem like a significant difference. -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ Much of which is still down |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
"David Dyer-Bennet" wrote in message ... "Jay Honeck" writes: You'll notice I've not mentioned the Number One reason people mention for quitting: Money. We've beaten the relative cost of flying to death, and (for the purposes of this thread) I will just leave it at this: Learning to fly is about as expensive as a semester of college, and less expensive than buying a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Let's leave "cost" out of this, for now, as I think it's safe to say that there a millions of Americans who could easily afford to learn to fly, if the urge were to strike. I don't really mean to try to drag the discussion back to the cost, because that's something individuals can't do much about. However, your comparison to a Harley is interesting. How many twenty-somethings buy Harley's these days? Aren't they more in the used Honda market? My impression, largely from a few people I know who own Harley's, is that the new sales of those are to older richer people almost exclusively these days. -- The Harley analogy isn't perfect either. Granted the cost between learning how to fly and buying a Harley might be similar, but once you get the Harley you don't have to pay $100/hr to rent it. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Even if you instantly did away with the knackered old trainers and had
brand new, state of the art trainers with AC and glass cockpits, the amount of time needed just to get the private and to be able to fly only in nice weather would mean that mainly just the passionate would complete their training. I'll agree with you on the old rental trainer issue -- GOD, I flew some dogs -- but the limitation of "only flying in nice weather" stuff is a bit silly. Mary and I have flown over 1500 hours in the last ten years, all VFR. We've been from one end of the North American continent to the other, and seen everything in between, on hundreds of flights, yet I can count on one hand the number of trips that have been delayed more than a few hours due to weather. The one that really got us -- Sun N Fun '04 -- was when we spent three days stuck in Nashville, in the snow. And I can assure you that NO ONE with anything less than a King Air was flying, IFR ticket or not. The private ticket is all one needs to reliably see America from the air -- and we're proof of it. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
There are too many 'magical' things in this world to be able to
experience them all on a regular basis. One needs to choose which ones they concentrate on. For some people, that is flying, for others, it is scuba diving, parachuting, or golf. I would love to scuba dive, but have never had the opportunity. When I lived on the shores of the Great Lakes, watching guys dressed up for polar diving just didn't excite me enough to try it (Brrr!), and now that I live in Iowa, well, the primordial ocean that once covered the Midwest has been gone for a few years... :-) And anyone who calls golf "magical" has clearly not sliced the ball into the woods, or hooked it into the water over, and over, and over... ;-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
My point is that there is a huge difference between dipping your feet in
the water and then bailing out, and actually finishing your certificate to become a certificated pilot. Once you become a certificated pilot, you are a pilot--obtaining a commercial, multi, etc. doesn't make you any more of a pilot, just as obtaining a commercial driver's license doesn't make you any more of a driver. Those who bail before obtaining a pilot certificate are not pilots, and may not exercise the privileges of a pilot certificate. I disagree with all these points. Jose -- Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe, except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Flying is boring to the generation that has been raised on action
filled TV, movies, and video games. Nonsense. They merely need to be shown the way. And we're the only ones that can do it, Gene! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
no RPM drop on mag check | Dave Butler | Owning | 19 | November 2nd 04 02:55 AM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |