A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 16th 05, 11:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post

News this morning said the plane landed too far down the runway, would have needed another 800' if it didn't go off the
end...


  #2  
Old December 23rd 05, 11:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post


Marc CYBW wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...121001562.html


SWA and ATA had FAA waivers concerning minimum visibilities:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,4692055.story

The pilots of Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 were permitted to attempt
a landing in extremely bad weather at Midway Airport because the
low-cost carrier holds a special FAA waiver to operate below regular
minimum-visibility safety regulations, federal officials said
Wednesday.
....
Among the 10 airlines serving Midway, Southwest and ATA Airlines have
been granted waivers from the Federal Aviation Administration allowing
planes to land when visibility is below three-fourths of a mile--the
established standard on Runway 31 Center, where the Southwest accident
occurred.

Pilots must be specially trained and log a required number of landings
with a certified pilot before receiving their own certification
allowing them to land at Midway with only one-half mile visibility,
called a "31Z approach."

  #3  
Old December 24th 05, 01:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post

rote

Marc CYBW wrote:
The pilots of Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 were permitted to
attempt a landing in extremely bad weather at Midway Airport
because the low-cost carrier holds a special FAA waiver to
operate below regular minimum-visibility safety regulations,
federal officials said Wednesday.
...
Among the 10 airlines serving Midway, Southwest and ATA Airlines
have been granted waivers from the Federal Aviation
Administration allowing planes to land when visibility is below
three-fourths of a mile--the established standard on Runway 31
Center, where the Southwest accident occurred.

Pilots must be specially trained and log a required number of
landings with a certified pilot before receiving their own
certification allowing them to land at Midway with only one-half
mile visibility, called a "31Z approach."


This is not a waiver, it is standard operating procedure for most
Part 121 aircarriers. OPSPECS for Part 121 carriers specify standard
CAT I minimums as 3/4 mile visibility. Any carrier may operate to
the lower minimum of 1/2 mile visibility by simulator training (and
checking) their pilots to hand fly ILSs to 100' DA. This was standard
at the aircarriers for which I both prepared the OPSPECS and flew.
The 1/2 mile OPSPEC authorization was not airport specific.

Bob Moore
ATP
PanAm (retired)
  #4  
Old December 24th 05, 05:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post


"Bob Moore" wrote in message

This is not a waiver, it is standard operating procedure for most


Bob, I don't know about the detail of the OPSpec, but I can concur with the
flying part. My training and sim ck always included a 100' ILS hand flown,
separate and apart from any other quals like CatIII, etc.


  #5  
Old December 29th 05, 10:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post


Bob Moore wrote:
rote

Marc CYBW wrote:
The pilots of Southwest Airlines Flight 1248 were permitted to
attempt a landing in extremely bad weather at Midway Airport
because the low-cost carrier holds a special FAA waiver to
operate below regular minimum-visibility safety regulations,
federal officials said Wednesday.


This is not a waiver, it is standard operating procedure for most
Part 121 aircarriers. OPSPECS for Part 121 carriers specify standard
CAT I minimums as 3/4 mile visibility. Any carrier may operate to
the lower minimum of 1/2 mile visibility by simulator training (and
checking) their pilots to hand fly ILSs to 100' DA. This was standard
at the aircarriers for which I both prepared the OPSPECS and flew.
The 1/2 mile OPSPEC authorization was not airport specific.


SWA briefly services ORD:

"December 29, 2005 - A Southwest Airlines jet was forced to make an
emergency landing at O'Hare Airport after colliding with a bird during
takeoff from Midway.

Flight 111 was on its way to Philadelphia when a bird was apparently
sucked into one of the 737's engines, causing it to shut down.
Southwest officials say they decided to send the plane to O'Hare
because it was a full flight and needed a longer runway.
The plane landed without incident. No one was hurt. A second Southwest
Airlines jet was sent to O'Hare to take the stranded passengers on to
Philadelphia."

JG

  #6  
Old December 25th 05, 12:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jet Crew: Reverse Thrusters Failed in Chicago - Washington Post

Heads up DFDR showed no TR malfunctions, NTSB insider which
sucks since we know these crewmembers.

Bush

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:22:00 GMT, "Marc CYBW"
wrote:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...121001562.html


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 11th 03 11:58 PM
08 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 9th 03 01:51 AM
Washington Post Article Tex Houston Military Aviation 4 September 26th 03 03:35 PM
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 19th 03 03:47 AM
PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? Brian Military Aviation 77 August 2nd 03 11:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.