![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess we need to agree on what "better" means.
Size vs. influence? We would have a 14K ceiling (Class A) for the past two decades without the AOPA. - Béla ------Original Message----- -From: Glider Pilot Network ] -Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:06 PM -To: Bela Szalai -Subject: [r.a.s] Important message for SSA members - ------------------------------------------------------------- -Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring -Subject: Important message for SSA members -Author: -Date/Time: 20:00 07 September 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------- -If SSA were to merge with a larger organization, EAA would be -better suited than AOPA. The EAA already has a number of -Divisions & Affiliates under its umbrella, including: - -International Aerobatic Club -http://www.iac.org/ - -Vintage Aircraft Association -http://www.vintageaircraft.org/ - -War Birds of America -http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/ - -National Association of Flight Instructors http://www.nafinet.org/ - -EAA Ultralights -http://www.eaa.org/ultralights/index.html - -Sport Pilot and Light Sport Aircraft Assoc. -http://www.sportpilot.org/ - -Young Eagles -http://www.youngeagles.org/ - -and there are more....... Each of these groups has its own -magazine and identity. - -EAA promotes and fully supports each and every one of these -organizations. Makes sense that a soaring division of EAA -would fit nicely with these other groups. - -In my opinion, SSA is just too small to efficiently manage -itself logistically and financially. - -Jon B. -GA - - - -Stan - VA wrote: - I think it is pretty clear that if the SSA survives this latest bout -of - mismanagment that our dues will mainly go to debt payment, -and not to - services for members. - - Several of us at our club have considered the pros and cons of the - AOPA idea. It definitely is worth discussing. - - The AOPA has some real lobbying power. If the SSA ever had any, it - won't now. The amount of $ SSA had, has, or will have to spend on - lobbying efforts probably won't even open the door for us -with anyone - in Washington. AOPA's clout is another matter. - - I don't know that the AOPA would be interested, but 16,000 pilots - would be a healthy addition to their membership, if that is what the - SSA membership is. Of course, some SSA are already AOPA members. - - A couple of pages monthly in the AOPA magizine would probably do - soaring a world of good. Most of the potential pilots for our sport - are already power pilots. - - AIG, the insurer who underwrites the policies that come from - Costello's, already has a relationship with the AOPA. Probably - Costello's has a relationship with the AOPA too. Hopefully, we - maintain our insurance in its present form. - - Let's face the reality of the situation. We may soon have -no national - soaring umbrella organization. We will need to deal with -that in some - fashion. Better to think about the alternatives now. - - Stan Scott - VA - - Tony Verhulst wrote: - Nyal Williams wrote: - We have always wanted to be more like the BGA. Do you believe - that, comprising 1% of the pilot population, we would -receive any - notice inside AOPA? Maybe one page near the back of the -magazine - -- occasionally. - - Would we receive any notice inside AOPA? No! Not even -inside EAA nor - even NAFI. Case in point, I used to be a NAFI (National Association -of - Flight Instructors) member. In one of their monthly (mailed) - newsletters (2002), they warned us that the PTS (practical Test - Standard)was changing and to make sure that we trained our -students - to the new standards. When I researched the matter I -discovered that - ONLY the - *airplane* PTS was changing - not glider, not helicopter, ... you - get the picture. I wrote a nice letter to the organization -president - and editor explaining the situation and requested a public -clarification. -I - got nowhere - not even a clarification in their online newsletter - which would have cost them nothing to distribute. After several - polite email exchanges, I realized that unless you were an -airplane - instructor you were nothing and that there was no point in -me being - a member. I resigned in protest. - - Expect similar treatment if we become part of AOPA. - - Tony V. CFIG - http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry Bill. Reading about contest flying is about
as exciting as watching paint dry. I will admit that the OLC has opened up some avenues for leaning by example, though. At 23:06 07 September 2006, Bill Daniels wrote: '5-BG' wrote in message ... Joe in Georgia wrote 'I doubt pursuits like Badge / Record Claims, Sporting code changes, sailplane handicaps, conventions, or contest management would be of any interest to them, and that is our bread and butter.' That MAY BE BREAD AND BUTTER to the contest pilot set, but it is of absolutly no interest to a significant number of recreational pilots who soar just to be flying and who have no interest whatsoever in contests,badges etc. A great deal of SSA resources are spent each month on a glossy magazine which is devoted in large part ( altho I do acknowledge the recent attempts to broaden its scope) to contests and to the 'elite ' of the sport. I wonder just how many of the 16,000 members actually care about the contest circuit. It is my opinion that the focus on contests as a measure of whether or not someone is having fun has not only lef to a split in the ranks of the SSA, but has also had a very bad impact on the business of building gliders suitable for the general flying population. I saw this same thing 30 years ago in ocean sailboat racing. The concept of daysailing, cruising and just having a good time was replaced by an emphasis on competition. From the individual yatch club level to the world cup. Boats got much faster AND way more expensive. They became more fragile and were outdated after a couple of seasons. I believe that the glorification of competition is OK and that it satisfies the ego needs of a significant portion of the pilots who own sailplanes. HOWEVER to say that it is the bread and butter of the SSA is just plain wrong. we wonder why kids are not coming into a sport that takes a $100,000 hot rod to be competitive. The attitude that if you don't have the latest glass ship that dominated the nationals last month you are somhow a lesser pilot is fostered by this bread and butter attitude. What ever happened to just jumping in a sailplane and losing oneself in the sky for several hours of solitude? Whatever happened to the concept of just trying to improve or develop skills just for personal satisfaction? These concepts are the bread and butter of soaring. Not only have the finances of SSA been mismanaged, but i believe that the society has become irrevelant to a significant portion of its recreational for fun pilots. 5bg This is bulls**t - give it a rest. I've heard it since I started flying gliders in 1960. It seems to come from people who don't care to make an effort to be good enough pilots to compete and whose egos can't stand hearing about those who can and do. All good pilots want to get better and reading about the accomplishments or others is an excellent incentive. It's like saying that kids who play ball don't care about the World Cup. Or the readers of Road & Track don't care about auto racing's Grand Prix Circuits. Most people who fly gliders want to read about competition whether it be just badges or the new Grand Prix Racing curcuit. This is one of the things the SSA has always done right. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oops. ...learning by example...
Leaning by example is usually caused by too many beers after flying, or when checking a new EGT with an instructor... At 00:42 08 September 2006, Bob C wrote: Sorry Bill. Reading about contest flying is about as exciting as watching paint dry. I will admit that the OLC has opened up some avenues for leaning by example, though. At 23:06 07 September 2006, Bill Daniels wrote: '5-BG' wrote in message ... Joe in Georgia wrote 'I doubt pursuits like Badge / Record Claims, Sporting code changes, sailplane handicaps, conventions, or contest management would be of any interest to them, and that is our bread and butter.' That MAY BE BREAD AND BUTTER to the contest pilot set, but it is of absolutly no interest to a significant number of recreational pilots who soar just to be flying and who have no interest whatsoever in contests,badges etc. A great deal of SSA resources are spent each month on a glossy magazine which is devoted in large part ( altho I do acknowledge the recent attempts to broaden its scope) to contests and to the 'elite ' of the sport. I wonder just how many of the 16,000 members actually care about the contest circuit. It is my opinion that the focus on contests as a measure of whether or not someone is having fun has not only lef to a split in the ranks of the SSA, but has also had a very bad impact on the business of building gliders suitable for the general flying population. I saw this same thing 30 years ago in ocean sailboat racing. The concept of daysailing, cruising and just having a good time was replaced by an emphasis on competition. From the individual yatch club level to the world cup. Boats got much faster AND way more expensive. They became more fragile and were outdated after a couple of seasons. I believe that the glorification of competition is OK and that it satisfies the ego needs of a significant portion of the pilots who own sailplanes. HOWEVER to say that it is the bread and butter of the SSA is just plain wrong. we wonder why kids are not coming into a sport that takes a $100,000 hot rod to be competitive. The attitude that if you don't have the latest glass ship that dominated the nationals last month you are somhow a lesser pilot is fostered by this bread and butter attitude. What ever happened to just jumping in a sailplane and losing oneself in the sky for several hours of solitude? Whatever happened to the concept of just trying to improve or develop skills just for personal satisfaction? These concepts are the bread and butter of soaring. Not only have the finances of SSA been mismanaged, but i believe that the society has become irrevelant to a significant portion of its recreational for fun pilots. 5bg This is bulls**t - give it a rest. I've heard it since I started flying gliders in 1960. It seems to come from people who don't care to make an effort to be good enough pilots to compete and whose egos can't stand hearing about those who can and do. All good pilots want to get better and reading about the accomplishments or others is an excellent incentive. It's like saying that kids who play ball don't care about the World Cup. Or the readers of Road & Track don't care about auto racing's Grand Prix Circuits. Most people who fly gliders want to read about competition whether it be just badges or the new Grand Prix Racing curcuit. This is one of the things the SSA has always done right. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 12th 04 03:03 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |