![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
... C J Campbell wrote: If the FBO pursued its claim against you, you would be able to sue them for defamation, Defamation? Sending you a bill is not defamation, even if they intentionally sent it to you knowing you weren't responsible for it. Did you read the part about "If the FBO pursued its claim against you..."? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If the FBO pursued its claim against you, you would be able to sue them for defamation, Defamation? Sending you a bill is not defamation, even if they intentionally sent it to you knowing you weren't responsible for it. Did you read the part about "If the FBO pursued its claim against you..."? Yes I did, and the answer would be that. It's not defamation. Do you have a clue what defamation is? Sending out bills and filing lawsuits or whatever to try to collect is not. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote in message m... Matt Barrow wrote: "Ron Natalie" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If the FBO pursued its claim against you, you would be able to sue them for defamation, Defamation? Sending you a bill is not defamation, even if they intentionally sent it to you knowing you weren't responsible for it. Did you read the part about "If the FBO pursued its claim against you..."? Yes I did, and the answer would be that. It's not defamation. Do you have a clue what defamation is? Yeah...it's what happens when someone knowingly and willfully files a false calim against you, encumbering your credit rating. Sending out bills and filing lawsuits or whatever to try to collect is not. See above. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The manager of the FBO called me today. He's now as perplexed as I am
and this matter is not resolved yet, but here's what we know: The 'concierge' (I'm thinking 'secretary/receptionist') who tried to help me on Saturday afternoon misinformed me: this was a credit transaction, but not with a credit card. That was a great relief to me; I just wish I hadn't had to wait nearly three days for it. Around 0300 on 20 May, a Sunday, a Pilatus landed at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and parked at Atlantic Aviation for a gas-n-go; the solo pilot was in a hurry. The two employees who serviced the aircraft both say they got the tail-number right. Payment was not made at the time and no information was recorded other than number of gallons, N-number and the pilot's scrawl on a charge-slip. I'm not familiar with business practices in the kerosene-burning part of GA so I don't know why they let the man escape that way, but I didn't press the manager on that point (although I will ask about that, politely, if he calls again). This FBO is part of a nationwide chain with more than forty locations; apparently they let customers run a tab somehow. And for me it's beside the point; all I cared about was whether the man used a credit card or ID with my name on it and I was assured that he didn't. The part about my reserved N-number bothers me but it may simply be incorrect; the manager says they haven't finished searching the FAA database for all the permutations of digits and letters. They've also asked ATC to check their arrival and departure records and that should clear up the matter -- unless their records also show my N-number ... Anyway, the FBO's records are keyed to N-number; when their clerk didn't get a match to an existing local file (a common thing considering the number of transient customers patronizing the chain) a new file was created and there the charge-slip sat for thirty days. Then it was sent to an off-site billing facility where someone queried the FAA database, got my name and address, and off went the 'past due' invoice. The manager and I agree that even though the two employees are sure about the number that doesn't guarantee that they weren't both wrong; it may be a case of only one noting the number (incorrectly) and the other supporting him blindly. They're continuing to search for a Pilatus with a similar number. If the ATC records show that my future number was actually being used then the Feds have a problem. But at least it appears that I probably don't have an identity-theft problem -- this time. I've written to the FAA telling them to remove my address from all public databases, but I should never have had to do that. Government at all levels ought to be required to justify, and ask each individual's permission for, public posting of personal data -- withholding such data ought to be the default action. As things are now, even Social Security numbers are viewable in one or more public records on most Americans. I'll pass on any further information I receive. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
quietguy wrote:
Anyway, the FBO's records are keyed to N-number; when their clerk didn't get a match to an existing local file (a common thing considering the number of transient customers patronizing the chain) a new file was created and there the charge-slip sat for thirty days. Then it was sent to an off-site billing facility where someone queried the FAA database, got my name and address, and off went the 'past due' invoice. Hey, I guessed right in my earlier post. They mixed up the N-number. They're continuing to search for a Pilatus with a similar number. It shouldn't be that hard, since you can query the FAA database by aircraft model/manufacturer, and state of registration. They should also be able to get information from the FAA or Flight Tracker on movements at the airport on a particular day. I've written to the FAA telling them to remove my address from all public databases, but I should never have had to do that. Government at all levels ought to be required to justify, and ask each individual's permission for, public posting of personal data -- withholding such data ought to be the default action. Good luck with that idea. They have all sorts of databases available on- line. Hard to escape them. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message . .. quietguy wrote: Anyway, the FBO's records are keyed to N-number; when their clerk didn't get a match to an existing local file (a common thing considering the number of transient customers patronizing the chain) a new file was created and there the charge-slip sat for thirty days. Then it was sent to an off-site billing facility where someone queried the FAA database, got my name and address, and off went the 'past due' invoice. Hey, I guessed right in my earlier post. They mixed up the N-number. They're continuing to search for a Pilatus with a similar number. It shouldn't be that hard, since you can query the FAA database by aircraft model/manufacturer, and state of registration. They should also be able to get information from the FAA or Flight Tracker on movements at the airport on a particular day. I've written to the FAA telling them to remove my address from all public databases, but I should never have had to do that. Government at all levels ought to be required to justify, and ask each individual's permission for, public posting of personal data -- withholding such data ought to be the default action. Good luck with that idea. They have all sorts of databases available on- line. Hard to escape them. I've got a program that combines the aircraft Databases. I show 400 Pilatus's nationwide, 40 in Texas, 1 in Austin. I forwarded these lists to the OP. What number are we looking for? Al G |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
Yeah...it's what happens when someone knowingly and willfully files a false calim against you, encumbering your credit rating. Who said anything about encumbering the credit rating? We're talking about billing. Even reporting the debt to a credit agency isn't actionable defamation unless you go through the due process provided you and you can actually prove that you were somehow damaged in the process. Your better bet would be to pursue them for violations of the FDCPA. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even in the avgas burners, much of it is on the honor system.
I've had gas pumped where they just take my N-number. They assume you're going to come in and settle up before you leave. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
m.
I've got a program that combines the aircraft Databases. I show 400 Pilatus's nationwide, 40 in Texas, 1 in Austin. I forwarded these lists to the OP. What number are we looking for? I was going to ask that. Given the number of network scavengers around this group, I suspect we could track the culprit down in short order given your N number. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 4, 10:27 am, Ron Natalie wrote:
Given the number of network scavengers around this group, I suspect we could track the culprit down in short order given your N number. Yes, but posting my N-number more widely is one thing I'm trying to avoid. I gave it privately to Al G after he privately sent me a listing of all Pilatuses in the country. I've examined that list and there's no good candidate for an honestly misremembered and transposed number; the closest has one digit that's an 8 versus my 9 -- I can't see anyone making that mistake, even with the briefest of glances. I'll pass that information to the FBO. This keeps alive the very troubling possibility that there's an airplane flying around with my reserved N-number on it. If so, I hope the thief is not smart enough to steal his fuel with a different number each time; his keeping mine on display would be our best hope of catching him. The ATC arrival/ departure records for 20 May will tell the tale. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Cadillac DeVille Courtesy Car! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 10 | January 18th 07 02:40 PM |
much garmin (etc) theft? | houstondan | Owning | 0 | September 2nd 06 04:31 AM |
Gas Theft Nashua (ASH) | Hank Rausch | Piloting | 42 | February 10th 06 09:36 AM |
Theft among friends | bumper | Soaring | 8 | July 29th 05 05:51 PM |
Theft From Baggage-Continental | [email protected] | Piloting | 73 | April 2nd 05 08:17 AM |