If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:03:01 -0500, Ari wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpz and that's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" He is a recreational pilot. No wars, no real hard times, fun in the sun roll about acro. A denigrator and a big shot.... with no shot -- Bear Bottoms website: http://bearware.com |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Nov 17, 2:03*am, Ari
wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. *We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzand that's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they don't know the answers to your questions? Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to answer the question does NOT? Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting. Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we? Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. At this point, T-D=0 and Ps=0. If g is decreased the F14 will WHAT? . If we pull harder, WHAT WILL HAPPEN? Fun isn't it? :-))) Dudley Henriques |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03*am, Ari wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. *We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzand that's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Ooook, let's try something simpler. Extending the flaps while the engine is at high power, this would be: 1) appropriate 2) Something you did for years 3) Idiocy I can get simpler if you want. -- Meet Ari! http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03*am, Ari wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. *We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzand that's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they don't know the answers to your questions? Proof-pudding Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to answer the question does NOT? Proof-pudding Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting. Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we? Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? -- They say your heroes reflect the quantity and fullness of your life. I have three, hummingbird, Bear Botttoms and Me.Here, the Triumvirate. Alas, now measured by said axiom, I have no life sigh |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd
wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they don't know the answers to your questions? Proof-pudding Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to answer the question does NOT? Proof-pudding Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting. Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we? Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education can see how right you are :-)) Fun isn't it? Dudley Henriques |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Ps=0. Nope. Sorry, this value doesn't change. Next time, don't be disingenous, you supplied, oh, half opf the necessary variables to even form a decent question. See, I flew them, you didn't. Luv, LL -- http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9 |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they don't know the answers to your questions? Proof-pudding Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to answer the question does NOT? Proof-pudding Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting. Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we? Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education can see how right you are :-)) Fun isn't it? Dudley Henriques Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation groups in order to pull new trolls in? Seriously? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education can see how right you are :-)) Fun isn't it? Dudley Henriques 5.5 squared does not equal 25 regardless of what drag (induced, etc) you care to blither on about. Fun, isn't it? -- They say your heroes reflect the quantity and fullness of your life. I have three, hummingbird, Bear Botttoms and Me.Here, the Triumvirate. Alas, now measured by said axiom, I have no life sigh |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:21:47 -0500, Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari wrote: On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed To wit: "I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass up and set you straight. -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-)) Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on. http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy. Contact me at anytime you have the ballz. Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?" -- Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they don't know the answers to your questions? Proof-pudding Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to answer the question does NOT? Proof-pudding Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting. Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we? Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education can see how right you are :-)) Fun isn't it? Dudley Henriques Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation groups in order to pull new trolls in? Seriously? Old, bored, washed-up...what else has he got to do? -- Meet Ari! http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
What happened to Jay?]
On Nov 17, 10:23*am, Payton Byrd
wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote: Consider the following; An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced drag has increased by a factor of 25. Incorrect. Next? Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education can see how right you are :-)) Fun isn't it? Dudley Henriques 5.5 squared does not equal 25 regardless of what drag (induced, etc) you care to blither on about. Fun, isn't it? -- They say your heroes reflect the quantity and fullness of your life. I have three, hummingbird, Bear Botttoms and Me.Here, the Triumvirate. Alas, now measured by said axiom, I have no life sigh You missed the term "increasing" I'm afraid. 5.5 squared is 30.5, which is fine for pure math, but not fine for a turning F14 with a linear expanding g profile. The 25 figure as stated in the assumption is correct within the problem. Fun isn't it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RV-8 What happened? | Lady Pilot | Home Built | 11 | October 16th 06 07:01 AM |
What happened? | Flyingmonk | Piloting | 6 | May 9th 06 12:19 PM |
Whatever happened to... | Ian Johnston | Soaring | 29 | November 25th 05 05:14 PM |
Whatever happened to ? | Anne | Military Aviation | 48 | May 26th 04 06:47 PM |
What Happened? | => Vox Populi © | Military Aviation | 7 | April 8th 04 12:58 AM |