![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK Jay, you have tolerated this guy, and have been one of the most open
minded and welcoming of the "regulars" on this NG. Do you still feel the same way, or are you rolling your eyes or gnashing your teeth yet at his imbecilic replies? I find it pretty intolerable to accept responses from a person who admits that they are afraid to fly, yet somehow makes pronouncements like a 5,000 hour pro.(example: "straight in approaches are OK") You're probably right in not responding, but I guess I'm more intolerant of idiots and lunacy. I suppose it's better to feel sorry for him and accept him for what he is, but when he argues with no factual basis, it becomes hard to take. I guess that's newsgroup at it's worst. It sure was nice not seeing his posts for a few days. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're probably right in not responding, but I guess I'm more intolerant of
idiots and lunacy. I suppose it's better to feel sorry for him and accept him for what he is, but when he argues with no factual basis, it becomes hard to take. I do feel sorry for him. He's built a reality that only he can appreciate, and a strange intolerance for something he apparently loves. Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. But the world is full of interesting folks, and anything that confuses me I usually find difficult to ignore. So, I keep swinging for the fence. MX is obviously not stupid, yet his responses are stubbornly illogical at times. In my experience with the public I have found that this trait isn't unusual -- so perhaps I'm just more used to it than you are? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without
ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. Well, I might prefer to emulate Indy 500 racing than actually doing it. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Lee writes:
Name one. California, which is the model for a number of other States. Others include Arizona, Texas, Utah, and Rhode Island. In these States, exceeding a posted speed limit may be taken as prima facie evidence of speeding, but it is not actually illegal. A person cited for speeding under this type of statute may successfully defend against the citation by demonstrating that his speed was in fact reasonable and prudent for conditions despite being above the posted speed limit. There are also absolute limits, which may be universal in some States, but may apply only to certain situations in others. For example, in Arizona, speed limits in school zones and on highways are absolute, but most others are subject to the "reasonable and prudent" law. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose writes:
... which is my point. Driving is set to the lowest common denomenator. Flying is set to the highest standard. If flying were set to the highest standard, you wouldn't need a special rating to fly IFR. Instead, "non-IFR" would be a special restriction applied only to those pilots who had demonstrated their inability to fly IFR. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Ron Lee" wrote)
We have a snow period now and I need some... (NAC) Necessary Aviation Content: "Super absorbent, designed with wings to fit the way..." Mont-don't-eat-that-yellow-snow-Black 46 years in Minnesota and I have NO IDEA what a snow period is? g |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Why in the world someone would want to emulate flying without ever really *doing* it is simply beyond my comprehension. Perhaps because you assume that flying in reality is unconditionally preferable to flying in simulation. However, just as flying for real has advantages that simulation does not, flying in simulation has advantages that flying for real does not. Thus, it's entirely to be expected that some people would prefer simulation to real flight. I've given examples before, but I can repeat a few. One example is that flying for real actually requires that one go somewhere. For people who don't like to travel or commute, this is a huge drawback to flying for real. Simulation takes you nowhere in real-world terms, and so it's ideal if you don't actually want to go anywhere. Simulation allows you to fly without paying the price of actually moving from place to place, with all the inconveniences that the latter brings. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose writes:
Well, I might prefer to emulate Indy 500 racing than actually doing it. Quite so, and many people do just that. Examples of simulation being preferred over the real thing are legion. Many people enjoy first-person shooter games, but have no desire to shoot or be shot at in real life. Many people enjoy virtual football play, but have no desire to play football for real. The list goes on and on. Nothing makes real flying inherently superior to simulation as a hobby. It all depends on what you want, and how well that matches what you get. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack schrieb:
46 years in Minnesota and I have NO IDEA what a snow period is? g maybe red snow? *pehehehe* scnr, #m -- I am not a terrorist http://www.casualdisobedience.com/ |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Jose writes: Well, I might prefer to emulate Indy 500 racing than actually doing it. Quite so, and many people do just that. Examples of simulation being preferred over the real thing are legion. Many people enjoy first-person shooter games, but have no desire to shoot or be shot at in real life. Many people enjoy virtual football play, but have no desire to play football for real. The list goes on and on. Nothing makes real flying inherently superior to simulation as a hobby. It all depends on what you want, and how well that matches what you get. One would think you've never flown in a *real* light aircraft...nothing making real flying inherently superior to simulation...sheesh. Ever had the wind in your face at 75 knots in a open cockpit bi-plane ? Ever had that *wonderful* experience of an engine-out 50 miles from the nearest airstrip ? Ever had the dizyiny execeleration of spinning in a *real* aircraft ? Ever experienced the sudden terror of realizing that you're in a sprial dive and rapidly nearing Vne ? I've been in a "couple" of simulators in my time but have yet to find one that can simulate a loop or an Himmelman...and let's not even talk about "games" like Flight Simulator ! ....Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual glide slope, $95...priceless! | Jack Allison | Owning | 20 | October 22nd 06 03:45 AM |
Priceless Tugs | kojak | Owning | 0 | August 9th 05 10:25 PM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 34 | March 7th 04 06:27 AM |
"Priceless" in Afghanistan | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 15 | February 28th 04 04:17 PM |
Priceless in Afganistan | breyfogle | Military Aviation | 18 | February 24th 04 05:54 AM |