If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
I often slip our club gliders down (1-34 and Grob III).
The way I look at it, being right on the glide slope is just "more intense" than arriving a little high and slipping. Especially when that end of the runway is really rowdy. When I fly the two place and I'm landing, my arrival height is occassionally of concern to the copilot. Then when I slip it down they ask why didn't I just set up lower? Oh well. To each his own. David Marc Ramsey wrote in message om... Eric Greenwell wrote: Refresh my memory, which doesn't seem to include this. Under what circumstances and glider types would this be true? If I'm too high, I adjust the pattern or open the airbrakes. I will slip on final for crosswind compensation, but why would I want make slipping turns in the pattern or elswhere? When I'm flying our Duo, a slipping turn from base to final is my standard procedure. I like to carry extra energy in the pattern (too much flying at Truckee), but the airbrakes aren't terribly effective, so I use a slipping turn to dissipate the excess energy, and hold it until I'm at an acceptable (shallow) approach angle. It also makes it a lot easier to see what's happening on the runway from the back seat. Marc |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Seim wrote:
When I do high rate dutch rolls, the glider seems to perfectly rotate around the axis, but the string is way all over the place. Explain THAT whydontcha? :PPP OK, I'll bite again. Dutch rolls are, by definition, uncoordinated. So I would expect the yaw string to be behaving as you said. It is your perception that is wrong. Tom Assume you make a glider which is a big cylinder with a huge hollow tube going through the middle. I lay it on its side and put a clear plexiglass on the top part for the pilot to see out of, and give him a seat inside. Then I put three yawstrings on it: one on the plexiglass "canopy", one in the middle of the center tube, and one on the bottom. I drop this "glider bomb" and it heads straight down (maybe there's a drogue chute). A gyro rotates the cylinder on the way down. Assuming no surface friction and ignoring gyroscopic precession for now, all three yaw strings, from the pilot seat, show different things. If the cylinder is rolling right, the "glider bomb pilot" sees the yawstring on the canopy and instinctively wants to add right rudder. The string in the center of pressure shows straight, and the bottom string would make the pilot want to add left rudder. None of this has anything to do with gravity, adverse yaw, or the cylinder slipping or skidding. I contest that there is an error caused on the yaw string depending on the roll rate, airspeed, and the distance of the yaw string above the center of pressure, and this will always tell the pilot to add more rudder in the direction of roll (assuming the yawstring is above the center of pressure), i.e. skid. The size and importance of this error is another matter entirely :PPP |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
On 1/29/04 9:00 AM, in article ,
"Owain Walters" wrote: ... accusing every comp pilot of not owning up to incidents is just plain rubbish not to mention insulting. Is this a claim that the statistics based on reports of accidents/incidents involving competition pilots are never skewed by the actions these pilots may take to avoid being included in official reporting? No one accused "every comp pilot", though the implication that some would like to remain unidentified in certain reporting is inescapable and, I suspect, quite true. More evil tricks by the "dirty old men" of EU soaring is it, Owain? ------- Jack ------- |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
This is one of the biggest nonsense myths in the soaring community. It
amounts to an irrational prejudice towards power pilots who transition to gliders. There is considerably greater difference between, say, flying a Bonanza and flying a Boeing 757 than flying any glider. Gliders are incredibly easy to fly. Simply be aware of the differences. It really amounts to attitude. (In both senses of the word.) When flying a Bonanza, think Bonanza. When flying a King Air, think King Air. When flying a B-757, think 757. When flying a F18, think F18. When flying a glider, think glider. When flying a motor glider, think glider. It can't be much simpler. Allan "Mark James Boyd" wrote in message news:401acc7c$1@darkstar... Pete Zeugma wrote: Ah, power planes, not gliders! Do you not think perhaps we should be differentiating between rudder usage in power plane, and a glider? I started flying originally in gliders, so I dont have any bad habits from power flying, and when I fly powered aircraft, i cant help but fly coordinated all the time. I know that power pilots who make the transition to gliders quite often make fundemental errors due to the power mindset when sat in a glider. What do you think? Absolutely there are subtle differences that get overlooked. Primacy is a factor here. Use of spoilers, wheel brake not at the feet, no stall horn, can't use throttle to descend, actually seeing adverse yaw, etc. All these were probably much harder to learn (unlearn) than if one started as a glider pilot first. ....Snip.... |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Jack wrote:
On 1/29/04 9:00 AM, in article , "Owain Walters" wrote: ... accusing every comp pilot of not owning up to incidents is just plain rubbish not to mention insulting. Is this a claim that the statistics based on reports of accidents/incidents involving competition pilots are never skewed by the actions these pilots may take to avoid being included in official reporting? How do they do this?? No one accused "every comp pilot", though the implication that some would like to remain unidentified in certain reporting is inescapable and, I suspect, quite true. I'm sure that lot's of people involved in accidents (comps or otherwise) would like to remain unidentified to save embarrassment. You made the potentially libellous insinuation that "some" unnamed pilots actually subvert the system to achieve this. Or it would be except there is not one substantiated fact behind the innuendo. And you are then disingenuous enough to express surprise that a competition pilot takes offence? -- Soar the big sky The real name on the left is richard |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
At 03:30 30 January 2004, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Nyal Williams wrote: Getting down fast! I was getting ready to enter the wave window at Mt. Mitchell, NC, and the cold suddenly told me my bladder was about to let go. Full divebrakes in a slipping turn got me on the runway in time, but I had to jump out and run to a ditch beside the runway; at 75 yards, the FBO toilet was just too far away. What speed did you use? Could you have just used full spoilers and spiralled down at 90 knots or so (or faster, if air was smooth), and had the same descent rate? -- ----- change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA 80kts in an ASK-21, but who knows the accuracy of an ASI in a slip? I was turning to the left with full right rudder and the nose as far down as I dared; the noise was tremendous. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
"ADP" wrote in message ... This is one of the biggest nonsense myths in the soaring community. It amounts to an irrational prejudice towards power pilots who transition to gliders. Gosh, don't I know it! After 2+ years of CFIGing, often teaching very accomplished power pilots transitioning to gliders, I have turned the tables. I am learning to fly the old fashioned way, bouncing around the pattern and the practice area in a tired but trusty Cessna. My instructors, who know nothing of gliders and have never before dealt with any transition student, see many of my glider "skills" as a series of curious "bad habits" to be corrected. (They were particularly horrified by my brisk, power-off, stall recoveries) As they have no frame of reference with which to deal with me, I just tell them to think of me as a primary student and start from the beginning. Vaughn |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"Vaughn" wrote in message ... "ADP" wrote in message ... This is one of the biggest nonsense myths in the soaring community. It amounts to an irrational prejudice towards power pilots who transition to gliders. Gosh, don't I know it! After 2+ years of CFIGing, often teaching very accomplished power pilots transitioning to gliders, I have turned the tables. I am learning to fly the old fashioned way, bouncing around the pattern and the practice area in a tired but trusty Cessna. My instructors, who know nothing of gliders and have never before dealt with any transition student, see many of my glider "skills" as a series of curious "bad habits" to be corrected. (They were particularly horrified by my brisk, power-off, stall recoveries) As they have no frame of reference with which to deal with me, I just tell them to think of me as a primary student and start from the beginning. Vaughn You'll be so good at landings they'll probably never get around to teaching go-arounds. One day, an airplane will taxi on to your runway while you are on short final. You'll probably revert to glider mode and land the Cessna on the grass parallel to the runway. Then, you'll have to think up a really good story to explain that. Bill Daniels |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Daniels" wrote in message ... You'll be so good at landings they'll probably never get around to teaching go-arounds. Yep, landings are not much of an issue. One day, an airplane will taxi on to your runway while you are on short final. You'll probably revert to glider mode and land the Cessna on the grass parallel to the runway. Then, you'll have to think up a really good story to explain that. I had a talk with the chief instructor about just that the other day. I explained to her that "go arounds" are not part of the glider experience. We decided to make that a priority. Vaughn Bill Daniels |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
"Vaughn" wrote in message ... "Bill Daniels" wrote in message ... You'll be so good at landings they'll probably never get around to teaching go-arounds. Yep, landings are not much of an issue. One day, an airplane will taxi on to your runway while you are on short final. You'll probably revert to glider mode and land the Cessna on the grass parallel to the runway. Then you'll have to think up a really good story to explain that. I had a talk with the chief instructor about just that the other day. I explained to her that "go arounds" are not part of the glider experience. We decided to make that a priority. Vaughn Power pilots think: Altitude must be exact. Speed is good and more speed is better. Glider pilots think: Speed must be exact. Altitude is good and more altitude is better. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Puchaz Spinning thread that might be of interest in light of the recent accident. | Al | Soaring | 134 | February 9th 04 03:44 PM |
Puch spin in | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 18 | January 24th 04 09:29 PM |
Spinning Horizon | Mike Adams | Owning | 8 | December 26th 03 01:35 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |