A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old May 14th 04, 11:08 PM
Guy Alcala
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote:

The point is the same point that Edmund Hillary and his small civilian band had
when they climbed Everest. Sure, Patton's Third Army could have done it by
sheer muscle power and expensive engineering, but Hillary did it with finesse.


snip

Well, no. The 1953 expedition did it along military logistic lines, as did the
earlier Himalayan expeditions to the great peaks. The leader of the expedition was
Brigadier Hunt, and the planning required to move supplies and people up the
mountain was analogous to supplying a 6-8 week military campaign, with Sherpas
acting as porters. After it was done that way well into the '70s, smaller, lighter
weight expeditions started to try and climb Everest and other big Himalayan peaks
'alpine-style', i.e. the climbers themselves carried all their food and gear with
them and climbed in a more or less continuous push from bottom to top. Alpine-style
is quicker, lighter, faster, and cheaper (one Japanese expedition in the '70s
employed over 700 porters getting their gear to base camp, with a couple of hundred
on the mountain itself).

Increased knowledge of extreme altitudes and improved technique and equipment made
such climbs possible. Perhaps the ultimate in finesse and style on Everest was set
by Reinhold Messner's solo climb without oxygen via the North Ridge in the early
'80s. He did have a little support; his girlfriend went to his base camp with him,
and waited for him there. OTOH, even he was mostly climbing a known route. However,
except for the last several hundred yards, so were Hillary and Tenzing, as Tenzing
had been to around the South Summit @ 28,700 ft. (IIRR; possibly they didn't get
that high) the year before with (IIRC) Raymond Lambert, as part of the Swiss
expedition. Bourdillon and Evans had certainly gotten to the South Summit before
retreating, a few days before Hillary and Tenzing made the second attempt that went
the rest of the way.

The 'tourist' climbs of the South Col route nowadays are done in the old style,
because most of the people involved lack the climbing skills and conditioning to do
it on their own. Expert climbers do old or new routes alpine style.

Guy

  #62  
Old May 14th 04, 11:13 PM
John T
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net

The X-Prize competition is a race to be the "first" to
do something that's been done before.


What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital or not)?
That's the largest part of the "not been there nor done that" aspect. The
two-week turnaround is part of the attempt to demonstrate a viable reusable
craft which would encourage commercialization of the activity.

The goal of the X-Prize, as I understand it, is to promote commercial access
to and use of space with a focus on space tourism. There are private launch
facilities, but none of them are for manned spacecraft. All manned space
flight is performed by government agencies that many consider to be far more
wasteful than a commercial enterprise would be.

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415
____________________


  #63  
Old May 14th 04, 11:36 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why is civilian suborbital flight a significant milestone?

That question was answered earlier in the thread.

And by the way, "ensure" means to make certain. "insure" means to (promise to)
make reparations, and "assure" means to make confident.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #64  
Old May 14th 04, 11:41 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

A suborbital flight, and repeat it with the same vehicle in a 14 day
period?

Funny, I can't remember hearing of such a thing.


The capability was there. Individual X-15s were flown within two week
periods a number of times and the craft was flown above 100 km.



I think you don't understand the actual rules or intent of the Ansari
X-Prize.


You'd be wrong abut that.


  #65  
Old May 14th 04, 11:41 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John T" wrote in message
ws.com...

What non-government entity has reached outer space (sub-orbital
or not)?


None, but that's irrelevant.



That's the largest part of the "not been there nor done that" aspect.


Why?



The two-week turnaround is part of the attempt to demonstrate a
viable reusable craft which would encourage commercialization of
the activity.


The X-15 had turnaround times less than two weeks.


  #66  
Old May 14th 04, 11:55 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

That question was answered earlier in the thread.


No, it wasn't.



And by the way, "ensure" means to make certain. "insure" means
to (promise to) make reparations, and "assure" means to make
confident.


Partially correct. Were you trying to make a point?


  #67  
Old May 15th 04, 12:31 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

A suborbital flight, and repeat it with the same vehicle in a 14 day
period?

Funny, I can't remember hearing of such a thing.


The capability was there. Individual X-15s were flown within two week
periods a number of times and the craft was flown above 100 km.


....you haven't read the actual rules yet, have you?

The X-15 carried one guy (the rules for the X-Prize require that the
craft has to be able to carry three, although it only has to have the
equivalent ballast for the actual prize flight).

The two semi-qualifying (100 km+) X-15 flights took place over a month
apart, in the #3 airframe.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #68  
Old May 15th 04, 12:35 AM
Mike Beede
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

A suborbital flight, and repeat it with the same vehicle in a 14 day
period?

Funny, I can't remember hearing of such a thing.


The capability was there. Individual X-15s were flown within two week
periods a number of times and the craft was flown above 100 km.


So now it's not "it's already been done," it's "it *could* have been already
done?" I think it's time to give up. The X-15 was a really cool plane, but
it wouldn't qualify for the X-Prize even if it was operational today. It
couldn't carry passengers.

It's a shame the orbital followons weren't funded, or space travel would
have looked very different for the last forty years.

Mike Beede
  #69  
Old May 15th 04, 12:37 AM
Chad Irby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

The X-15 had turnaround times less than two weeks.


It did, after some lower and slower flights.

Not after the high-altitude flights, though, and the average gap between
"hard" flights of the same airframes was a month and a half.

They also had a tendency to need major parts of the airframe (tail and
wing surfaces) replaced or refurbished after the more demanding flights.

Not to mention they were doing this with a much smaller payload.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.
  #70  
Old May 15th 04, 12:52 AM
zatatime
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 14 May 2004 22:55:04 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

That question was answered earlier in the thread.


No, it wasn't.



And by the way, "ensure" means to make certain. "insure" means
to (promise to) make reparations, and "assure" means to make
confident.


Partially correct. Were you trying to make a point?




Yes it was.....

snip
["Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in
message
ink.net...

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

Somebody step on your tail? It really is going to be tough. If
Rutan were attempting something easy, it wouldn't be worth all
that attention, would it? What, are you trying to belittle his
accomplishments or what he is trying to do?


Just what is the point of the whole X-Prize competition anyway? I
understand the requirements, but why do it all? The Rutan Voyager flight
wasn't particularly useful either, but it was something that hadn't been
done before.


Someone might have said the same thing to the Wrights.

The idea is to prove that privately financed space travel is both
feasible
and reasonable. No government has managed to do what Rutan and the
others
are attempting. The prize has the additional advantage of attracting
media
attention so that, once it has been won, public interest in space
tourism
will be generated.]

end snip

If you're going to participate you need to learn to retain the
responses you receive in a thread. What is outlined above not only
demonstrates the significance of the X-Prize, but is also significant
in demonstrating that you should be PLONK'ed by everyone in this
forum!

I volunteer to lead the way.

See ya.
z

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there! Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Military Aviation 150 May 22nd 04 07:20 PM
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! BlakeleyTB Home Built 10 May 20th 04 10:12 PM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 07:05 AM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) Peter Stickney Military Aviation 45 February 11th 04 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.