A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Angry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old December 23rd 05, 11:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Tom Conner wrote:

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
ups.com...

I don't recall Clinton being impeached because of a blowjob. He was
impeached because he sat down, raised his hand and said "I swear to
tell the truth, the whole truth, so help me God....I did not have
sexual relation with that woman..."



Maybe I am wrong about this, but I have never understood this "lying"
argument that justified the impeachment. If I remember correctly, the judge
in the case where Clinton lied specifically ruled, that for the purpose of
the trial, sex was only considered to be intercourse.

While his answer was evasive, it was accurate in regard to the trial.



I guess that depends on what your definition of "is" is, or what you
definition of evasive is and what your definition of accurate is.

Matt
  #62  
Old December 23rd 05, 11:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Don Tuite wrote:
I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County
Airport? (Q99)


your charts aren't up to date!.. it is now called E16.

--Sylvain
  #63  
Old December 24th 05, 12:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry


"Don Tuite" wrote in message
news

I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County
Airport? (Q99)

Q99 was the departure point immediately before the crash, and the
crash scene (going by a map in the newspaper) was 2 miles away, into
rising terrain, more or less along a crosswind departure leg, assuming
a takeoff to the south. That'd be orthogonal to 101.

The accident report says the departure point was "Santa Clara," but
that's just part of Q99's full name.

I apologize if I'm trying to teach my grandma to suck eggs here.


From Hilton's message:

"A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in
similar
conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along
Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they
tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the
valley)."


  #64  
Old December 24th 05, 12:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Don Tuite wrote:
I'm confused. Was that how they originally got to South County
Airport? (Q99)

Q99 was the departure point immediately before the crash, and the
crash scene (going by a map in the newspaper) was 2 miles away, into
rising terrain, more or less along a crosswind departure leg, assuming
a takeoff to the south. That'd be orthogonal to 101.

The accident report says the departure point was "Santa Clara," but
that's just part of Q99's full name.


Don, the info I gave above pertained to a different accident that occured in
2003; aircraft departed RHV. The most-recent accident did depart Q99 (now
E16). Sorry for the confusion, but someone asked me for more info on the
2003 Commander accident.

Hilton


  #65  
Old December 24th 05, 12:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Hilton wrote:

No, but were instrument rated and it was a Commander. It may have been a
legality issue (currency etc) that cause them to go VFR, I don't know.


Doesn't sound like they were too concerned about legalities. Scud
running all the way from RHV along Hwy 101 below 500' would surely run
afoul of FAR 91.119.


I'm still not sure why they felt scud-running all the way down 101 to the
reservoir, then flying into higher terrain was safer than a 30 second IFR
climb though the layer. The obvious options a
1. Neither was current
2. Aircraft wasn't legal IFR
3. Major delay getting out of RHV (SJC traffic does cause a delay)

Note: This refers to the 2003 accident.

Hilton


  #66  
Old December 24th 05, 01:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Robert M. Gary wrote:
Ejection seats don't necessarily guarantee safety. My father died after
ejection.


Sorry to hear that, Robert.

What type aircraft?


Jack
  #67  
Old December 24th 05, 01:06 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

Jose wrote:
S/E at night in IMC _is_ dangerous.



So is flying. Anything.


Some more, some less.


Jack
  #68  
Old December 24th 05, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:05:39 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:

From Hilton's message:

"A couple of years ago, a CFI and Commercial student hit the hills in
similar
conditions although it was day time. Scud ran all the way from RHV along
Hwy 101 below 500' in a Commander and then ran into the hills when they
tried to get through next to the reservoir near Hollister (heading into the
valley)."

Oh. Getting old. That's why I apologize in advance these days.

Don
  #69  
Old December 24th 05, 06:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

r. mutt wrote:
Well the article says the incident occurred at 8:20 a.m.


They found the wreckage at 8:20am. I believe the pilot made an 'emergency'
call to ATC at 9pm the previous night.

Hilton


  #70  
Old December 24th 05, 06:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Angry

("LWG" wrote)
[snip]
Yeah, like 900 secret FBI files in the possession of a White House
employee whom no one could remember hiring.



I absolutely loved his (Senate?) testimony. :-)

He had no answers for what exactly he did there - in the basement ...with
all those files, no recollection of who hired him to work in the White
House, no recollection about his interview for that White House job, etc,
etc, etc.

A democrat abruptly asks the Chairman for a lunch-break.

After "lunch" the guy comes back and say Vince Foster hired him. What a
sham!


Montblack

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aircraft Spruce: Abused Customers and Fourteen More Angry Comments -- More to Come jls Home Built 2 February 6th 05 08:32 AM
If true, this makes me really angry (Buzzing Pilot kills 9 year-old son) Hilton Piloting 2 November 29th 04 05:02 AM
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! Malcolm Austin Soaring 0 November 5th 04 11:14 PM
JEWS AND THE WHITE SLAVE TRADE B2431 Military Aviation 16 March 1st 04 11:04 PM
Enemies Of Everyone Grantland Military Aviation 5 September 16th 03 12:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.