Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay. WTC 7 was the only WTC building not in the same physical area as
the other WTC buidlings.

Except, of course (and we all knew this was coming, right), that it
*was* in the same area.

It wasn't immediately next door, but was in the same area, and was
actually closer to the towers than some other buildings that were also
heavily damaged. The only intervening building was WTC 6, a fairly
small one (that was pretty much erased when the towers fell). Between
fire and the earthquake-equivalent damage, WTC 7 was a lost cause well
before it fell in on itself.

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, I admit I don't have the qualifications for this. What I do know is
what an aeronautical engineer has said

Yeah - one crazy ex-engineer who used to be active about thirty years
ago, but who now writes about UFOs and odd religious beliefs.

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, I admit I don't have the qualifications for this. What I do know is
what an aeronautical engineer has said. (He's also qualified to fly large
aircralf.) I consider him an expert.

Because *he* validates *your* personal worldview.

Meanwhile, any number of active/retired commercial/military/GA pilots,
structural engineers, physicists and so on declare his ideas complete
and utter nonsense ...

You don't get to decide what is fact or not, you only get to choose
whether or not you accept fact.

And you failed the quiz.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:52:41 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

Okay. WTC 7 was the only WTC building not in the same physical area as
the other WTC buidlings.

WTC-7 was located 355 feet from the North Tower.

The leaseholder of WTC 7 had been in posession
of the lease since the building was built in 1987. Six weeks before 9/11
he bought a lease on the entire WTC complex. I don't know the legality,
but this site may help explain:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news...6/07/15925.htm

Your point? You know even know if it's relevant but you throw it out anyway.

Also, WTC 7 housed numerous government agencies. Paper documents, such as
those from ENRON, were destroyed when the building was "pulled".

Only a moron would blow up an office building they own to destroy their own
documents instead of simply shredding them. Only a complete idiot would claim
that an agency capable of secretly blowing up a national landmark and killing
3,000 people are morons.

WTC 7 was a steel framed building and housed the mayor's 13 million
dollar command bunker. It is theorized that this bunker was used to
control the Towers' demolitions (it was dust proof), and therefore needed
to be destroyed for any evidence it may have.

So not only was it the federal government, the city of New York was involved?
We're talking hundreds of people, if not thousands; to do something that would
have been just as easily accomplished from inside a portable trailer with a 10
man crew.

Also, the WTC 7 collapse begs the question: would the city construct the
mayor's 13 million dollar command bunker in a building that could
completely collapse from random damage and fires?

There is no such thing as an indestructable building, where should they have
located it, inside Norad's Chyenne Mountain complex?

Not many people know about WTC 7 because of media silence. Even when
Professor Jones was on MSNBC, the station refused to play the WTC7 video
clip he sent them! info on this at www.st911.org

You still haven't offered one shred of evidence as to how the government knew
in advance that a building not in the same physical area as the impacts would be
hit by large pieces of debris and set on fire for half a day with the fire
unable to be controlled by the NYFD due to 20 inch water main ruptured by
falling debris.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:56:57 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

see here

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/building7.html

Nothing there about how the government knew in advance that it would be hit by
falling debris and the NYFD would be unable to fight the fire due to a 20 inch
water main in front of the building being ruptured by falling debris.

Had that not happened, the government would have blown up a perfectly fine
building. Are you claiming that the government has a machine that can see the
future or agents of the government can travel backwards in time?

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:18:10 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

In that video, he writes with his right hand, when the FBI's website says
he's left handed.
He wears a gold ring, which is forbidden in Islam.

Blowing up 3,000 random people is also forbidden in Islam. Apparently
following the rules isn't one of Bin Laden's strong points.

Orval Fairbairn wrote:

In article ,
mrtravel wrote:


TRUTH wrote:

mrtravel wrote in news:lizLf.39501$H71.28236
:

Didn't the engineer's article mention clouds over West Virginia?

Was the WTC in WV?

The supposed hijacking did not occur near the WTC

When they arrived at WTC, were there clouds?


No -- the weather was "severe clear" over the entire East Coast of the
US, as I have pointed out earlier.

WE know it was clear.. TRUTH is the one with the head that is cloudy

On 26 Feb 2006 03:07:06 -0800, wrote:

everyone is a nutter,

Not everyone, just a few fringe lunatics who think the government has a time
machine so they could know to wire WTC-7 in advance. Otherwise they spend a
thousands of man hours planting thousands of pounds of explosives in a building
that hadn't been touched, causing a building to collapse that didn't even catch
on fire.

On 26 Feb 2006 11:54:07 -0800, "george" wrote:


Johnny Bravo wrote:
On 26 Feb 2006 03:07:06 -0800, wrote:

everyone is a nutter,

Not everyone, just a few fringe lunatics who think the government has a time
machine so they could know to wire WTC-7 in advance. Otherwise they spend a
thousands of man hours planting thousands of pounds of explosives in a building
that hadn't been touched, causing a building to collapse that didn't even catch
on fire.
:-)
To further confound the conspiracy nutters heres a link to the world of
building demolitions..
http://www.implosionworld.com/
It takes a -long- time to set up such a demolition..

I've seen a site where it was claimed that a tiny thermonuclear weapon was
used, possibly ignited by anti-matter.

Apparently there isn't any limit to what they will believe as long as it
reaffirms their delusions.

Orval Fairbairn wrote in newsrfairbairn-
:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:fjXLf.27320$Ug4.323@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote in
:

Truth,

Man, there is one thing I envy you for: the amount of TIME you
must
have at your disposal. A pity you waste it liek this, though.



at present, I do have an abundance of time

Fired from your job or incarcerated?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired





Perhaps I was sent on a mission from God, like Bush...

How do you know that it was *God* speaking, and not the Devil?




For all we know, Bush might have been speaking to the devil. Afterall
John Buchanan says (paraphrased):

"Bush does not take his philosophical foundation from the bible. Bush
gets his inspiration from what he learned in Skull and Bones."

Buchanan is the investigative journalist who found proof at the National
Arhives and Library of Congress that Bush's grandfather, senator
Presott, conspired to overthrow the constitution, assisisnate FDR, and
turn the US in a Nazi camp, as is explained in this video:
http://illuminati-news.com/Videos/ke...the-family.wmv