A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Requesting lower"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old January 19th 07, 09:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Danny Deger writes:

You fly sims, you don't know what you are talking about.


You're half right.

Why don't you listen to people that fly real airplanes for a change?


I do, once I have reason to believe that they know what they are
talking about. Unfortunately, that cannot be taken for granted.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #62  
Old January 19th 07, 09:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default "Requesting lower"


Mxsmanic wrote:
Robert M. Gary writes:

So what' s the point of filing IFR if you're going to cancel an hour
outside your destination just because you want lower?


Because you had to fly through IMC to get that far, and you want to
fly VFR once the weather permits?


But that's not what the poster said. The poster was asking about
decending.

-Robert

  #63  
Old January 19th 07, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


BDS wrote:
Tony writes:

One human factor that's been overlooked -- on late night flights, it is
often very very quiet aloft. I like the sound of a human voice from
time to time, it's reassuring to know the coms are working. Listening
in on aircraft to aircraft frequencies, and chatting as well, is I
think a safety factor. Pilots who make long cross country flights will
understand the reality of my point , others may appreciate at least the
theory.


I think the ATC guys get just as lonely - I think I've had them start up the
conversations late at night more often than the other way around.


I was flying back from Mexico several months ago and had just cleared
through San Diego. When I got handed off to Lemoore approach at about
20:30 it was pretty slow. I was in and out of IMC but wx was clearing.
So I asked them if they knew when Harris Ranch restuarant closed. The
controller came back about 5 minutes later, said he had checked with
the menu in the break room, confirmed they were open until 22:00 and
wanted to know if I would like to divert and if he could phone in a
reservation for a table for us!!!! My wife was 1/2 awake and the kids
were asleep in the back but eventually all agreed that steaks after a
week of Mexican food sounded good. He even prefiled an IFR for the rest
of our trip after dinner!!!

-robert, CFII

  #64  
Old January 19th 07, 09:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Let's say you are approaching a uncontrolled airport with overcast at 1500
ft AGL and there are VFR pilots in the pattern. Do you think that just maybe
this is why there are more than one radio in most aircraft and in virtually
all aircraft that fly IFR regularly?


I don't know the original purpose for two radios, but it cannot be
that, because there will be no VFR pilots (legally) in the pattern
with an overcast at 1500 feet.


While 1 radio is legal ( as is no radio) its not very uncommon. When
approaching an uncontrolled field IFR any reasonable pilot will have
CTAF dialed in #2 and listening long before ATC releases him, so he
understands what is going on in the pattern.

-robert, CFII

  #65  
Old January 19th 07, 09:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


Mxsmanic wrote:
Gig 601XL Builder writes:

Let's say you are approaching a uncontrolled airport with overcast at 1500
ft AGL and there are VFR pilots in the pattern. Do you think that just maybe
this is why there are more than one radio in most aircraft and in virtually
all aircraft that fly IFR regularly?


I don't know the original purpose for two radios, but it cannot be
that, because there will be no VFR pilots (legally) in the pattern
with an overcast at 1500 feet.


In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.

Kev

  #66  
Old January 19th 07, 10:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BDS[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 149
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")


"Robert M. Gary" wrote

I was flying back from Mexico several months ago and had just cleared
through San Diego. When I got handed off to Lemoore approach at about
20:30 it was pretty slow. I was in and out of IMC but wx was clearing.
So I asked them if they knew when Harris Ranch restuarant closed. The
controller came back about 5 minutes later, said he had checked with
the menu in the break room, confirmed they were open until 22:00 and
wanted to know if I would like to divert and if he could phone in a
reservation for a table for us!!!! My wife was 1/2 awake and the kids
were asleep in the back but eventually all agreed that steaks after a
week of Mexican food sounded good. He even prefiled an IFR for the rest
of our trip after dinner!!!


The other pilot here at work was flying in the Chicago area a couple years
ago. He was late and a little harried and was on the center frequency when
he asked if someone would mind calling his appointment to let them know he
was going to be late. The controller (who my friend thought was the unicom
operator) said something like "Er, ah, OK", took the info and made the call.
It was shortly afterwards that my friend realized who he made the request
with.

It was a busy time of day and so it was pretty neat that they accommodated
him - maybe the controller was just in shock that someone would request that
center do something like that!

BDS


  #67  
Old January 19th 07, 11:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Kev writes:

In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.


Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #68  
Old January 20th 07, 01:02 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Milen Lazarov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

On 2007-01-19, Mxsmanic wrote:
Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).


And what is the required cloud clearance in class E?
  #69  
Old January 20th 07, 01:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 368
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Mxsmanic wrote:
Kev writes:

In the U.S. they'll be there and legal. At a pattern altitude less
than 1200', you're legal during the day if you stay clear of clouds.


Only in Class G, and at a vast number of untowered airports 1000' AGL
is still in Class E (700' floor).


In Class E, with a typical 800'-1000' pattern, they'd still be 500'
below the aforementioned 1500' clouds, and therefore legal.

I soloed under those conditions. Thereafter I was known as "MVFR Kev"
:-)

  #70  
Old January 20th 07, 06:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Communications (was "Requesting lower")

Milen Lazarov writes:

And what is the required cloud clearance in class E?


1000 above, 500 below when flying below 10000 MSL, and 1000 in both
directions when flying at or above 10000 MSL. So you cannot fly a
pattern at 1000 AGL in Class E if you have a ceiling of 1500.

This applies to the United States (FAR 91.155); I don't know about
other countries.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.