![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja writes:
Because no matter who responds, you're getting the answer filtered through their senses and experience. True, but with enough responses, I can average it all out and get a pretty accurate picture. Some things cancel out, and others reinforce. If everyone says X, but nobody agrees on Y, then X is a pretty good rule, but Y is not. Five minutes in an aircraft would allow you to understand the issues of trim, from both a conscious and muscle-memory perspective. And a few hours in a 737 simulator would teach me a lot about that aircraft. But neither of these things is likely to happen any time soon. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Stadt writes:
He doesn't have a simulator he has a Microsoft game. Saw an ad on TV last night for their new verson and it was advertised as a game. Games make more money than simulators. Initial reports are that the latest version has shifted a bit more towards a game, apparently to broaden the market. All the more reason to stay with the previous version. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dylan Smith writes:
Is pay really that low in France? Low pay is only part of it. It's a long story. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
If you really have this much interest in real aircraft $49 would be worth every penny even if it was for less than 20 minutes. It takes two days for me to earn $49. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RK Henry writes:
Dangerous advice. For an introductory price you get addicted and find yourself with an aviation habit and can't stop. That is a risk that has occurred to me as well. And I definitely cannot afford an expensive addiction like that. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Lieberma writes:
How would the controls be linked if they were not mechanically done so??? Osmosis????? Fly-by-wire. In the real world, everything is connected mechanically in some manner, shape or form. See above. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
RK Henry writes: Dangerous advice. For an introductory price you get addicted and find yourself with an aviation habit and can't stop. That is a risk that has occurred to me as well. And I definitely cannot afford an expensive addiction like that. LOL A friend of mine turned down a ride on a high-performance helicopter because "It might cause me to make a bad career decision" |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cubdriver usenet AT danford.net writes:
I trim for level flight after I've finished the climb. Most of the time that's full forward, and sometimes full forward isn't enough and I hold a bit of forward stick. Why do you need full forward for level flight? Doesn't that imply a badly placed center of gravity? If the aircraft is just that way, it sounds a bit dangerous if you have to hold it like that just to stay level. If you let go with neutral trim, what happens? I did some training at Chandler AZ in a Super Cub, and the instructor insisted that I stop trimming on landing. I didn't like it much, and as soon as I was alone I reverted to going to neutral trim on every downwind. (I suppose he was having me adjust the power on each leg of the pattern, so I was adjusting trim on downwind, base, and final.) See, if I spend time adjusting trim during those phases of flight, I lose track of everything else. I suppose it might be easier to adjust trim on some real aircraft, but from what I've seen of the placement of trim controls, it doesn't seem likely. I'd be afraid of getting distracted by trim when I should be looking at other things, like the tree approaching my windshield. No rudder or aileron trim on the Cub. What about torque effects and stuff like that? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Stewart writes:
A friend of mine turned down a ride on a high-performance helicopter because "It might cause me to make a bad career decision" I think I know exactly what he means. The risk of addiction is probably low, but since I can't even pay my rent these days, it's still too high a risk to take. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: A Lieberma writes: How would the controls be linked if they were not mechanically done so??? Osmosis????? Fly-by-wire. Excuse me?????? WRONG AGAIN. Look up in Google fly by wire. Nothing to do with the rigging of controls. You know I am in a nice mood tonight. Check out http://www.google.com/search? hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:Fly+by+wire&sa=X&oi=glo ssary_definition&ct=title In the real world, everything is connected mechanically in some manner, shape or form. See above. WRONG AGAIN. See above. Sheeze, when will you learn to stick with your games and leave this group for REAL PILOTS that fly REAL PLANES. I have yet to find anything of value in your postings since I keep typing WRONG AGAIN on just about every one of your response. Allen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making a pitch trim indicator for a Glasair | [email protected] | Home Built | 5 | September 13th 06 02:30 AM |
Cherokee Electric Pitch Trim | Jonathan Goodish | Owning | 4 | November 18th 04 02:43 AM |
A very basic question | Ramapriya | Piloting | 45 | November 9th 04 01:57 PM |
Ramifications of Cherokee Trim Jackcrew Failure | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 18 | June 9th 04 02:48 AM |
Lance vx. 6/300 | Bridgadoon | Owning | 27 | September 28th 03 08:20 PM |