[Fwd: What happened to Jay?]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:25:11 -0500, Ari wrote:

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:21:47 -0500, Gezellig wrote:

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I
said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed

To wit:

"I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?"

If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass
up and set you straight.
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-))

Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your
troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on.

http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy.

Contact me at anytime you have the ballz.

Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you
out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?"
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that
people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out
here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they
don't know the answers to your questions?

Proof-pudding

Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually
believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that
this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being
that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to
answer the question does NOT?

Proof-pudding

Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting.
Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we?

Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation
groups in order to pull new trolls in?

Seriously?

Old, bored, washed-up...what else has he got to do?

Waking up from a coma can really throw some hard truths at you.
--
They say your heroes reflect the quantity and fullness of your life. I
have three, hummingbird, Bear Botttoms
and Me.Here, the Triumvirate. Alas, now measured by said axiom, I
have no life sigh

On Nov 17, 10:21*am, Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I
said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed

To wit:

"I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?"

If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass
up and set you straight.
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-))

Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your
troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on.

http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat'sjust alt.privacy.

Contact me at anytime you have the ballz.

Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you
out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?"
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that
people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out
here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they
don't know the answers to your questions?

Proof-pudding

Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually
believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that
this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being
that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to
answer the question does NOT?

Proof-pudding

Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting.
Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we?

Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation
groups in order to pull new trolls in?

Seriously?

I take it you are referencing the cross posting? These idiots were
here LONG before they discovered me, so go shout at someone else.

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:30:03 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:23*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

5.5 squared does not equal 25 regardless of what drag (induced, etc) you
care to blither on about.

Fun, isn't it?
--
They say your heroes reflect the quantity and fullness of your life. I
have three, hummingbird, Bear Botttoms
and Me.Here, the Triumvirate. Alas, now measured by said axiom, I
have no life sigh

You missed the term "increasing" I'm afraid. 5.5 squared is 30.5,
which is fine for pure math, but not fine for a turning F14 with a
linear expanding g profile.
The 25 figure as stated in the assumption is correct within the
problem.

Call me when any calculator squares 5.5 to get 25.

Thanks for playing.
--
http://www.bushflash.com/idiot.html

On Nov 17, 10:21*am, Gezellig wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:57*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like I
said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed

To wit:

"I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?"

If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your ass
up and set you straight.
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-))

Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your
troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on.

http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat'sjust alt.privacy.

Contact me at anytime you have the ballz.

Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you
out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?"
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that
people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out
here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they
don't know the answers to your questions?

Proof-pudding

Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually
believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that
this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being
that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to
answer the question does NOT?

Proof-pudding

Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting.
Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we?

Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation
groups in order to pull new trolls in?

Seriously?

Let me give you some friendly advice. You post crap like this to me or
anyone else on Usenet and all you do is create one more person who
marks you as the same idiot you have just attempted to mark them; net
result is no further meaningful contact between you such as will be
the case now here with me.
Usenet is Usenet. You take it as it exists at any moment in time or
you get out. It's that simple. The only other option is to become a
constant "bitch" and complain and preach to others as you are doing
here.
If you do this, you use as much bandwidth as the people you are
"correcting" and the result of these "corrections" are almost always
counter productive to your intent.
I suggest that you do what millions of others who frequent these
forums do when it comes to this kind of thing. Just suck it up and
shut your mouth. On Usenet, nobody cares what you think. Nobody cares
what I think. It's a cesspool.
If you died today, no one would really care. If I died today, no one
would really care. Your "friends" would put in a small post that reads
something like "God speed. He will be missed", and your enemies would
post something like "Thank God that Son-of-a-bitch is dead. He was an
opinionated rotten ******* who thought he knew everything. I'm glad
he's gone". It's just Usenet old buddy, and that's the way it is!
These forums long ago became what they are now, so if you come across
posting from me, or anyone else around here that ****es you off, just
filter out these people. Posting like you just did to me is a totally
useless waste of time; yours for writing it; mine for answering it as
I just did; and others who read it.
Just take my name Dudley Henriques, and create a killfile and you're
all done.
Now on the other hand, if you want to join the ranks of those who post
these endless off topic posts on Usenet (and this is indeed one of
those) then just join up as you have just done. But be advised that
all you have done is join the ranks.
Welcome aboard! Now if you want to continue asking me stupid questions
like you just did prompting this answer, be my guest, but I can tell
you up front, anything useful both of us might have gained from
exchanging dialog with each other will go right down the ole Usenet
toilet.
I hope this is clear enough for you.
Dudley Henriques

"Gezellig" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:02:09 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 9:57 am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:03 am, Ari
wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:24:55 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
If your chest puffed out any farther, you's explode your heart, like
I
said, STFU about canards or answer the question Bottoms proposed

To wit:

"I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?"

If/when you guess wrong, no worries, I'll be right here to pick your
ass
up and set you straight.
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

Why sure you will Maxie. We all know that already. :-))

Let's get this straight, Duds. Maxie/Maqxwell/Mx or whomever is your
troll X to bear. My posting history (Ari Silverstein) is years on.

http://tinyurl.com/62bdpzandthat's just alt.privacy.

Contact me at anytime you have the ballz.

Soooooo, you want to skip out on the decalage? Now back to calling you
out. I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as
they apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of
decalage as they do in a Cessna? Or not?"
--
Meet Ari!http://preview.tinyurl.com/3wh3hh

I'm curious about something. Do idiots like you actually believe that
people who ignore these Usenet "challenges" people like you put out
here supposedly to embarrass them are proving to the world that they
don't know the answers to your questions?

Proof-pudding

Seriously.......I've always wondered how your minds work? You actually
believe that if you throw out some "gauntlet" and it's refused, that
this constitutes irrefutable proof on two levels...the first being
that YOU know the answer, and secondly that the person refusing to
answer the question does NOT?

Proof-pudding

Interesting.......sophomoric perhaps, but interesting.
Let's see how YOU do in this idiotic format shall we?

Consider the following;
An F14 at 420 KCAS, 15K, in a level turn at military. As the g is
increased, drag increases as it's square. At about 5.5g, induced
drag has increased by a factor of 25.

Incorrect.

Next?

Thank you. Exactly the expected response. Now since you have said this
is an incorrect statement and it is in fact correct, you are now asked
to post a "corrected" answer so everyone with a 3rd grade education
can see how right you are :-))

Fun isn't it?
Dudley Henriques

Dudley, is it really necessary for you to go outside the rec.aviation
groups in order to pull new trolls in?

Seriously?

He wasn't the one who originally crossposted this thread and is no more
guilty of what you allege than you are, Einstein.

On Nov 17, 10:19*am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Ps=0.

Nope. Sorry, this value doesn't change. Next time, don't be disingenous,
you supplied, oh, half opf the necessary variables to even form a decent
question.

See, I flew them, you didn't.

Luv,

LL
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

Actually as it happens I did have a few hours in the Turkey. Strike
Aircraft Test Directorate at Pax River. Wanna compare photographs and
documentation perhaps? I'm always glad to meet someone from the
community.
Dudley Henriques

On Nov 16, 6:54*am, More_Flaps wrote:
On Nov 16, 2:08*pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:



On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:34:08 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
LOL! The Great Warrior Dudley Dewright Henriques, now talking troll.
Query this.

A canard wing and a main wing (on a Cozy IV) reverse the rules of
decolage (compared to a Cessna 150x). Yes? *
--
Bear Bottoms
website:http://bearware.com

If you are asking me if the angles of incidence between the tail and
wing combination and canard and wing combination on the Cozy are
different on each type I'll refer you to Nat Puffer.

I'm asking whether or not you understand the rules of decalage as they
apply to a pusher. Do they operate on the same principles of decalage as
they do in a Cessna? Or not?

Is the question about aerodynamic or geoemetric decalage?

LOL

Cheers

Believe it or not it's a viable question as he asked it. I just don't
like the way it was asked :-))
Dudley

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:04:27 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 10:19*am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Ps=0.

Nope. Sorry, this value doesn't change. Next time, don't be disingenous,
you supplied, oh, half opf the necessary variables to even form a decent
question.

See, I flew them, you didn't.

Luv,

LL
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

Actually as it happens I did have a few hours in the Turkey. Strike
Aircraft Test Directorate at Pax River. Wanna compare photographs and
documentation perhaps? I'm always glad to meet someone from the
community.
Dudley Henriques

What do you call a cow masturbating?

Beef stroganoff.
--
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

On Nov 17, 11:22*am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:04:27 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:19 am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Ps=0.

Nope. Sorry, this value doesn't change. Next time, don't be disingenous,
you supplied, oh, half opf the necessary variables to even form a decent
question.

See, I flew them, you didn't.

Luv,

LL
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

Actually as it happens I did have a few hours in the Turkey. Strike
Aircraft Test Directorate at Pax River. Wanna compare photographs and
documentation perhaps? I'm always glad to meet someone from the
community.
Dudley Henriques

What do you call a cow masturbating?

Beef stroganoff.
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

I thought so.
DH

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:24:51 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:

On Nov 17, 11:22*am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:04:27 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:19 am, Little Luke
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:38:35 -0800 (PST), Dudley Henriques wrote:
Ps=0.

Nope. Sorry, this value doesn't change. Next time, don't be disingenous,
you supplied, oh, half opf the necessary variables to even form a decent
question.

See, I flew them, you didn't.

Luv,

LL
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

Actually as it happens I did have a few hours in the Turkey. Strike
Aircraft Test Directorate at Pax River. Wanna compare photographs and
documentation perhaps? I'm always glad to meet someone from the
community.
Dudley Henriques

What do you call a cow masturbating?

Beef stroganoff.
--http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9

I thought so.
DH

When you went for your Check In physical, and they told you to count to
three (when they checked your prostate), did you start at
100..99..98...?
--
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6glxm9