If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
"Jerry Wass" wrote in message . net...
Stuart & Kathryn Fields wrote: Limited experience with a Franklin in a Bell 47 had a lot of lead fouling, compared with Lycoming engine experience. Different plugs or mags? Also if there wasn't oil under it before start up, it needed more oil. Not my bird though. All of the above could be maintenance related? Stu "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Anthony W" wrote Anybody know if these new Franklin engines are any good? If they are, a complete engine for under $7 make me wonder why anybody would use a VW engine instead of one of these... I have no first hand experience, but I know someone with one, and they don't have kind things to say, as compared to the other "big two" opposed engine makers. I don't know of anything specific, though. -- Jim in NC The Franks use a 14mm plug in lieu of the usual 18mm--there's not as much room between electrodes & porcelain to let the lead balls fall out. especially the 3 electrode plug which works a lot better than the other types. Jerry Plus, they still spec 100/130 for the minimum fuel grade? http://www.franklinengines.com/4a.cfm http://www.franklinengines.com/6a.cfm If they meant 100LL, why wouldn't they say it? The TCDS that I can find at FAA.GOV list minimum octane at 73 to 80 for the older engines... |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
Anthony W wrote:
Jerry Wass wrote: The Franks use a 14mm plug in lieu of the usual 18mm--there's not as much room between electrodes & porcelain to let the lead balls fall out. especially the 3 electrode plug which works a lot better than the other types. Jerry According to the website the new Franklin engines have 18mm spark plugs. I can only assume they discovered that problem. What I don't understand is how the Franklin engine company ended up in Eastern Europe. The last I'd heard of them was that the Franklin engine division was the only surviving department of Tucker motors. From what I read Tucker brought Franklin because they couldn't get the bugs out of their own engine design. Tony The Polish company PZL bought the Franklin production rights, tooling, engineering etc from whatever receiver was sitting on it back in the 90s. Wasn't aware that Tucker ever owned Franklin. He originally got his Franklin engines from Howard Hughes, who had a warehouse full of VIO 5 something engines for helicopters and wanted to unload them on a sucker, and found a willing dupe only one letter of the alphabet away. John |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
Blueskies wrote:
Anybody know if these new Franklin engines are any good? The Franks use a 14mm plug in lieu of the usual 18mm--there's not as much room between electrodes & porcelain to let the lead balls fall out. especially the 3 electrode plug which works a lot better than the other types. Jerry Plus, they still spec 100/130 for the minimum fuel grade? http://www.franklinengines.com/4a.cfm http://www.franklinengines.com/6a.cfm If they meant 100LL, why wouldn't they say it? The TCDS that I can find at FAA.GOV list minimum octane at 73 to 80 for the older engines... I was wondering about that too. The compression ratio doesn't seem high enough to require that. Perhaps a thicker head gasket could be used to lower the CR so it would run on auto-premium to make it cheaper to operate. Tony |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
John wrote:
The Polish company PZL bought the Franklin production rights, tooling, engineering etc from whatever receiver was sitting on it back in the 90s. Wasn't aware that Tucker ever owned Franklin. He originally got his Franklin engines from Howard Hughes, who had a warehouse full of VIO 5 something engines for helicopters and wanted to unload them on a sucker, and found a willing dupe only one letter of the alphabet away. John I didn't verify it but according to a History channel show on Tucker. After too many failures of the Tucker engine, Franklin aircraft engines were converted to liquid cooling and proved to be reliable and Tucker bought the Franklin company to be sure and have an uninterrupted supply of engines for his cars. After the bankruptcy, the Franklin engine company was sold off but I don't know who bought it and I assumed they were gone forever. If the Pols are doing a good job at building these new Franklin engines, they sure look like a bargain. Tony |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
On Feb 8, 7:01*pm, "Morgans" wrote:
wrote * * * Point was: *After all the fooling around and the unexpected costs associated with the installation, it wasn' worth it. These things tend to cost way more than we figure, and take a long time to sort out. I just want others to know that, so that they aren't as unpleasantly surprised like we were. Point taken. Auto engine installations are definitely for the person that wants something different, and realizes that there will most likely be some things to sort out. -- Jim in NC That's the "educational" part of homebuilt experimental planes.... Ben www.haaspowerair.com |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
"stol" wrote in message ... On Feb 8, 7:01 pm, "Morgans" wrote: wrote Point was: After all the fooling around and the unexpected costs associated with the installation, it wasn' worth it. These things tend to cost way more than we figure, and take a long time to sort out. I just want others to know that, so that they aren't as unpleasantly surprised like we were. Point taken. Auto engine installations are definitely for the person that wants something different, and realizes that there will most likely be some things to sort out. -- Jim in NC That's the "educational" part of homebuilt experimental planes.... Ben www.haaspowerair.com ----------------above line is prior post (OE strikes again!)-------------- I've seen a few really nice ones, and a couple that got a little too educational! Peter |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
In article hNorj.881$R64.37@trndny03,
Anthony W wrote: I didn't verify it but according to a History channel show on Tucker. After too many failures of the Tucker engine, Franklin aircraft engines were converted to liquid cooling and proved to be reliable and Tucker bought the Franklin company to be sure and have an uninterrupted supply of engines for his cars. After the bankruptcy, the Franklin engine company was sold off but I don't know who bought it and I assumed they were gone forever. At least as of the mid-70s Franklin engines were in production. About the time I first started instruction, Bellanca was making Aeroncas, and they offered their 7AC equivalent with a 2-cylinder Franklin engine. For $4995 FAF. (I wanted one *sooooooooooo* much at the time.) If the Pols are doing a good job at building these new Franklin engines, they sure look like a bargain. Tony |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
On Feb 9, 2:10 pm, Anthony W wrote:
I was wondering about that too. The compression ratio doesn't seem high enough to require that. Perhaps a thicker head gasket could be used to lower the CR so it would run on auto-premium to make it cheaper to operate. I've had very little to do with Franklins, but if they're built like most other opposed aircraft engines, there is no head gasket. The steel cylinder screws into the aluminum head, more or less permanently, using a shrink fit. The only way to lower the compression ratio in such engines is to shim the cylinder base/crankcase junction. I once owned a McCulloch two-stroke four-cylinder drone engine that had been modified this way to derate it from 72 hp to 50 and to allow it to run smoother at a lower RPM. Terrible engine, commonly used years ago in Bensen's gyrocopters. They'd been built by McCulloch for the military, who used them in target drones for anti- aircraft gunners to practice shooting down, so the engine was designed for a 15-minute service life or something like that. In homebuilts, they vibrated like mad, and the mag would get hot and quit. The carburetor throttle shaft would wear the thin carb barrel walls out in no time flat and leak air. But cheap they were, light, and plentiful. Couple pictures of one, and one of a Franklin drone engine, too: http://www.barnstormers.com/EVENTS/0...museum-21.html Dan |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
VW Reality
wrote:
On Feb 9, 2:10 pm, Anthony W wrote: I was wondering about that too. The compression ratio doesn't seem high enough to require that. Perhaps a thicker head gasket could be used to lower the CR so it would run on auto-premium to make it cheaper to operate. I've had very little to do with Franklins, but if they're built like most other opposed aircraft engines, there is no head gasket. The steel cylinder screws into the aluminum head, more or less permanently, using a shrink fit. The only way to lower the compression ratio in such engines is to shim the cylinder base/crankcase junction. I once owned a McCulloch two-stroke four-cylinder drone engine that had been modified this way to derate it from 72 hp to 50 and to allow it to run smoother at a lower RPM. Terrible engine, commonly used years ago in Bensen's gyrocopters. They'd been built by McCulloch for the military, who used them in target drones for anti- aircraft gunners to practice shooting down, so the engine was designed for a 15-minute service life or something like that. In homebuilts, they vibrated like mad, and the mag would get hot and quit. The carburetor throttle shaft would wear the thin carb barrel walls out in no time flat and leak air. But cheap they were, light, and plentiful. Couple pictures of one, and one of a Franklin drone engine, too: http://www.barnstormers.com/EVENTS/0...museum-21.html Dan Perhaps, like teh VW, a spacer at teh bottom of the cylinder can be used to adjust compression? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HondaJet a reality | [email protected] | Piloting | 3 | July 28th 06 01:50 AM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | October 14th 04 06:10 PM |
Reality of Tie Down (Tiedown) Space at SNA | Tie Town | Owning | 1 | May 6th 04 07:43 AM |
Reality of Tie Down (Tiedown) Space at SNA | Tie Town | Piloting | 1 | May 6th 04 07:43 AM |