A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Presidential TFR @ Kill Devil Hills



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old December 17th 03, 05:02 AM
Philip Sondericker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in article et, Steven P.
McNicoll at wrote on 12/16/03 8:24 PM:


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm

The documents on this page aren't totally conclusive, but it would appear
from the available evidence that Mr. Bush was AWOL.


So now I just have to sort through those documents to find support for your
position?


I really don't care what you do. Why do you look to me for direction?

Actually, I don't really have a "position" in regards to this issue. I
noticed it had been brought up, and a 10-second Google search found the
above link. There's some interesting information there, for anyone with the
initiative to spend a nanosecond or two on it.

  #72  
Old December 17th 03, 05:04 AM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:03:17 -0600 "Matthew P. Cummings" wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:27:50 -0800, R. Hubbell wrote:

next president will be more enlightened. And keep up the pressure on
how silly they are in the press and support AOPA.


I got news for you, AOPA doesn't care about you and I and our flying
freedoms. I know of an aircraft that was in the process of being stolen
and the local police let the guy go. The owner called AOPA to let them
know how well this new system was working and they basically told him that
they didn't care and to take it up with someone else.

So you see, AOPA doesn't really care about silly rules unless it affects
them I suppose. They certainly aren't trying to maintain a list of
failures that they could then suggest better ways of doing things.
Homeland security is a joke and the AOPA doesn't care.



I got news for you. AOPA is not in charge of enforcing the laws. If the
police let the guy go, take it up with the police.



R. Hubbell
  #73  
Old December 17th 03, 05:05 AM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:07:05 -0700 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote:


"R. Hubbell" wrote in message
news:7oGDb.18330$pY.11414@fed1read04...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:05:39 GMT Dave S wrote:

Ok.. at the risk of interrupting the partisanship here...

What makes you think that if the next prez is a Democrat that the SS..
er Secret Service will not still insist on a 60 mile diameter bubble?



You're really trying to spoil all the fun! We can only hope that the
next president will be more enlightened.


Not unless we gat an alien being from another planet in the race.


There is one already, a.k.a. the incumbent, but he's not enlightened.



R. Hubbell



  #74  
Old December 17th 03, 05:07 AM
Rob Perkins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:12:49 GMT, Philip Sondericker
wrote:

Are you able to cite a single instance of CNN, ABC, et al ever calling the
President "dumb"?


"He lacks gravitas"

Rob
  #75  
Old December 17th 03, 05:07 AM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:53:58 GMT Bob Noel wrote:

In article KtGDb.18366$pY.5656@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

He was flying F-102s.


Hours logged as PIC? Where's the bragging and the boasting? Military
pilots
wear their logged hours as a badge of honor.


what nonsense.


Which part, you mean that he was PIC in F-102s? I am beginning to believe that
too.


R. Hubbell


--
Bob Noel

  #76  
Old December 17th 03, 05:09 AM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:53:28 GMT Bob Noel wrote:

In article qsGDb.18357$pY.9524@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
wrote:

He flew F-102 supersonic jet interceptors, on active duty in the USAF
and later in the Texas Air Guard.


How many hours did he log as PIC? Most pilots brag about that, in fact
most
consider that to be the defining metric.


what military pilots do you hang around with? I've never
met a military pilot that brags about hours.



Brag is probably the wrong word but number of hours is a metric that gets
tossed around a bit. But never heard any mention of Dubya's hours as
PIC.


R. Hubbell


--
Bob Noel

  #77  
Old December 17th 03, 05:19 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CD

You could white wash your numbers and have at it.

Where there's a will, there's a way.

It's a way to protest stupidity.

Big John


On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:06:06 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:


What would happen if 500 GA birds showed up towing banners saying "Go
home Mr presiden, we want to fly"?

Do you think they have enough F-16's and weapons to shoot down them


Perhaps not, but the FAA probably has enough bureaucrats to pull the
certificates on 500 pilots.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com


  #78  
Old December 17th 03, 05:22 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob

Good catch. I put the salutation in lower case and incomplete spelling
to show my feelings for the stupidly.

Big John.

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:07:38 GMT, Bob Noel
wrote:

In article , Big John
wrote:

What would happen if 500 GA birds showed up towing banners saying "Go
home Mr presiden, we want to fly"?


they'd get flamed for the spelling errors?

;-)


  #79  
Old December 17th 03, 05:26 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...

I really don't care what you do. Why do you look to me for direction?


I'm not looking to you for direction. You said Bush's Guard service was not
honorable, I asked you what you found dishonorable about it. Instead of
answering you posted a web address.



Actually, I don't really have a "position" in regards to this issue. I
noticed it had been brought up, and a 10-second Google search found the
above link. There's some interesting information there, for anyone with

the
initiative to spend a nanosecond or two on it.


If you want to establish any credibility in these forums you have to support
your own assertions.


  #80  
Old December 17th 03, 06:26 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...
in article et, Steven

P.
McNicoll at wrote on 12/16/03 8:24 PM:


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm

The documents on this page aren't totally conclusive, but it would

appear
from the available evidence that Mr. Bush was AWOL.


So now I just have to sort through those documents to find support for

your
position?


I really don't care what you do. Why do you look to me for direction?

Actually, I don't really have a "position" in regards to this issue. I
noticed it had been brought up, and a 10-second Google search found the
above link. There's some interesting information there, for anyone with

the
initiative to spend a nanosecond or two on it.


Well, when you make a claim, it's up to you to support it. Further, it's up
to you to find ALL RELEVANT information, including that info that refutes
your position if it's available.

In this case, such information IS available. So, now it's up to you; let's
see how much of a mature man you really are.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract Tiger Naval Aviation 0 January 29th 05 05:24 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
What is the reasoning behind the smaller radius vice presidential TFR? Larry Dighera Piloting 38 November 19th 03 04:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.