BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

Whatever.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
om...

I'd say we're about at the complacent stage.....

I'd vote for apathy.

Who cares?

In article , John Harlow says...
No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else choose
to marry.

Then I suppose it's OK for someone to choose to marry young boys as NAMBLA
supports, or young girls ,or 2 women or 10 women or your favorite sheep
BAAAbara or a goat or your Sister etc. I wonder just who's business it is to
prevent those marriages or are all those marriages OK in your eyes ? Do you have
any boundaries? and if so why is it any of your damn business?

Chuck S

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...
in article , C J Campbell at
wrote on 9/11/04 11:57 PM:


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...

Am I the only one who finds it curious that people were challenging
the
authenticity of these documents almost from the very moment they were
released?


Of course, this is not the first time that Kerry and associates have
been
forging documents, is it? There was that little scam on Western Union
during
the war, where friends and relatives of servicemen in Vietnam would get
telegrams beginning, "We regret to inform you that...." Nasty little
trick,
that, but Kerry would probably just as soon that no one was reminded of
it.

Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?

It was so bad that the Army took out newspaper ads debunking the fake
telegrams and saying that from now on relatives of Vietnam casualties
would
be notified personally.

Do you have a credible source for your allegation? Or do your moral and
intellectual standards permit you to propagate such accusations without
fact-checking first?

--Gary

in article , C J Campbell at
wrote on 9/12/04 3:52 PM:


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...


Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?


It was so bad that the Army took out newspaper ads debunking the fake
telegrams and saying that from now on relatives of Vietnam casualties would
be notified personally.

Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?

jls wrote:

He's talking about the 2nd Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms as
expressed in the 2nd Amendment has been translated by Scotus as not
absolute. The right has been tied to the state militias as not an
individual right.

As far as I know, this is not correct. The only statement of SCOTUS on this matter
with which I am familiar is a statement to the effect that "the right of the people"
definitely is an individual right. This is based on the fact that the only two other
places in the Bill of Rights in which this phrase occurs cannot by any stretch of the
imagination be interpreted otherwise. To what case are you referring?

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.

"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...
in article , C J Campbell at
wrote on 9/12/04 3:52 PM:


"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...


Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?


It was so bad that the Army took out newspaper ads debunking the fake
telegrams and saying that from now on relatives of Vietnam casualties
would
be notified personally.

Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?


I have no source other than reading it in New England newspapers back in
1969 - 1971. The AP has been reporting similar activities in connection with
the Iraq war, although not all of those are anti-war protesters. Some of
them were simply mean people attempting to con people out of death benefits.
In those cases the con men would show up in military uniform and attempt to
get spouses and others to sign papers releasing their rights to death
benefits, which has to be the absolute lowest of the low. There were
flurries of that in April and August of 2003, as well as anti-war activists
in Southern California calling the families of Marines at Camp Pendleton,
saying that they were from the Red Cross and that their Marine had been
killed.

The Internet has provided a new twist: some Arab Americans are reporting
that people are sending out hate mail using their email addresses in an
attempt to inflame anti-Arab sentiment.

So the same stuff that went on during Vietnam perpetuates itself. I don't
know why you seem so surprised at this -- it isn't exactly an original idea.
But, if you want to believe that it never happens, suit yourself.

you sure got that right. Liberalism is a mental disease. The libs are
destroying the country.


"OtisWinslow" wrote ...
The god damn Dems are our biggest enemy. They believe in freedom
and wealth for them only. They want our weapons taken away so
we can't fight back as they redistribute what we've worked for
to some lazy ass that won't work for their own. They scare me far more
than
a bunch of
camel jockeys.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...
in article , C J Campbell at
wrote on 9/12/04 3:52 PM:

"Philip Sondericker" wrote in message
...


Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?


It was so bad that the Army took out newspaper ads debunking the fake
telegrams and saying that from now on relatives of Vietnam casualties
would
be notified personally.

Never heard of that one. Do you have a source for this?


I have no source other than reading it in New England newspapers back in
1969 - 1971.

Uh, and which of Kerry's "associates" were implicated in this alleged
forgery, according to your uncorroborated 35-year-old recollection?

Newspapers are archived in libraries, by the way. If "Kerry and associates"
had done what you accuse them of, isn't it odd that no one in the world has
bothered to take a moment to look up and publicize the documentation for
such a spectacularly incendiary charge?

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:Qof1d.427276$%_6.90413@attbi_s01...

I have no source other than reading it in New England newspapers back in
1969 - 1971.

Uh, and which of Kerry's "associates" were implicated in this alleged
forgery, according to your uncorroborated 35-year-old recollection?

Newspapers are archived in libraries, by the way. If "Kerry and
associates"
had done what you accuse them of, isn't it odd that no one in the world
has
bothered to take a moment to look up and publicize the documentation for
such a spectacularly incendiary charge?

Not particularly odd. Even when it happens nowadays, it barely makes the
papers. Besides, what is so spectacularly incendiary about it?

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:Qof1d.427276$%_6.90413@attbi_s01...

I have no source other than reading it in New England newspapers back in
1969 - 1971.

Uh, and which of Kerry's "associates" were implicated in this alleged
forgery, according to your uncorroborated 35-year-old recollection?


VVAW was doing some of that, yes. However, I have no stamps with Kerry's DNA
on them. I might point out that the complaints former POWs have about Kerry
are also 35 year old recollections. I guess if you want, you can say that
anything that happened that long ago did not happen. That would be your
typical liberal response: if you don't like the truth, accuse others of
lying.