![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A good approach would be awareness, if one considers actual training too
risky. The Glider Flying Handbook from the FAA has a chapter on Abnormal and Emergency Procedures. It contains suggested procedures for a wide variety of system failures, including such things as asymmetric spoiler deployment. Worth reading... and rereading now and then. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Incredible! Good thread. My faith in human nature is
starting to return. We went from don’t practice anything to “ it might be a good idea to try one” Chuck At 05:06 30 September 2005, Roger Worden wrote: A good approach would be awareness, if one considers actual training too risky. The Glider Flying Handbook from the FAA has a chapter on Abnormal and Emergency Procedures. It contains suggested procedures for a wide variety of system failures, including such things as asymmetric spoiler deployment. Worth reading... and rereading now and then. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andreas Maurer wrote:
My decision for myself is clear: As soon as I'm not absolutely sure anymore to have the glider under control, I bail out. I have no need for control experiments at low altitudes where the slightest mistake is definitely going to kill me - especially if the alternative is a relatively safe bail-out out of a halfways controlled glider. Yes, but deciding when that happens is the hard part, well was for me anyway. I have had 2 partial primary control failures (in 4 years of gliding), landed safely each time, but I still wonder if I made the right decision. The first was in LS4, at about 7000 feet and at that time I had about 120 hrs in about two years of gliding. It was a rented ship away from my own club. The ship just had its manual, was test flown by its owner and I have flown it for 4 days prior to this incident. I do a pcc before each flight and did it then. The aileron movement was not the smoothest but I was assured it was OK. Anyway at about 7000 I needed a large aileron deflection to the right and about half way there was a definite stop. Stupidly (if automatically) I applied a fair force and powered through the obstruction. I remember thinking at the same time something like "you idiot, what if it does not come back". Well it did come back, I did some testing, the event did not repeat in a pattern that I could discern, but as the obstruction only occurred at about half travel so I have decided to land. I have increased speed to about 70 kts, where only small deflections were needed and landed normally. I have only recently found out that there was a serious problem that was rectified. The second incident happened in my club ship, a Hornet. Once again a DI, including a PCC was done. I have flown for about 2 hours without an incident when I went to pull up quite sharply into a thermal when the elevator come to a full stop with what felt like a soft clunk. Anyway once again I did some testing and found that with what was a full elevator I could fly no slower then 55 kts and a bit more with airbrakes. The controls felt perfectly normal in the remaining range. Anyway, once again I decided to land. When I descended to about 2000 ft AGL I put away the air brakes to set up a landing pattern. At stage I found that I could not fly slower then about 65kts. Anyway, a bit of adrenalin must have manifested itself at this point and a sharper tug on the elevator freed the control. I have landed normally. When we removed the elevator we have discovered a piece of lead ballast in the tail. It was put in upside down and moved in flight wedging under a flange on the elevator pushrod (hence the soft clunk). Clearly a few safety issues here - the use of the ballast was not universally known by club members, checking for it was not part of the DI and apart from the control locking there could have been a C of G problem for lighter pilots. Anyway, these issues have been addressed. The second incident came about 3 month after the first one and I am sure both had a significant impact on my flying confidence. In any case, to this day I am not sure that I have done the right thing by remaining with the glider. In both cases I had a stable platform to depart and I have some 100 jumps to my name, admittedly some 30 years earlier, so I think I would have been relatively comfortable jumping. Paul |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul wrote:
In any case, to this day I am not sure that I have done the right thing by remaining with the glider. In both cases I had a stable platform to depart and I have some 100 jumps to my name, admittedly some 30 years earlier, so I think I would have been relatively comfortable jumping. This is interesting, because some people recommend all gliders making at least one practice jump, partly on the theory they won't be so reluctant to jump when they need to. Maybe it's more wishful thinking than good advice, but I don't know of any "post jump" interviews to see if the jumpee agreed with the theory. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
This is interesting, because some people recommend all gliders making at least one practice jump, Make that "glider pilots". -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I've been making spoilerless landings for years. Of course, the
ships I've flown most don't have them... but I had my smart@$$ hat on and just couldn't help myself... Jack Womack |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
Well, I've been making spoilerless landings for years. Of course, the ships I've flown most don't have them... but I had my smart@$$ hat on and just couldn't help myself... Well, then, how about landing with just one flap? -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , bumper
writes "Bert Willing" wrote in message ... As long as the pedals are spring-loaded (which has been the case in any glider I've flown so far), there is no reason that the rudder should stay centered after the failure of one cable. -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" Even if there were no springs involved, if a rudder cable parted, and unless the rudder or cable were somehow jammed (probably unlikely), then I think aerodynamic pressure would tend to return the rudder to near neutral - - assuming the pilot removed pressure from the opposite pedal. bumper There was an incident in the UK a year or so back with an ASK13 in which one rudder cable became detached. Glider made a safe outlanding. -- Mike Lindsay |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Lindsay wrote:
In article , bumper writes "Bert Willing" wrote in message ... As long as the pedals are spring-loaded (which has been the case in any glider I've flown so far), there is no reason that the rudder should stay centered after the failure of one cable. -- Bert Willing ASW20 "TW" Even if there were no springs involved, if a rudder cable parted, and unless the rudder or cable were somehow jammed (probably unlikely), then I think aerodynamic pressure would tend to return the rudder to near neutral - - assuming the pilot removed pressure from the opposite pedal. bumper There was an incident in the UK a year or so back with an ASK13 in which one rudder cable became detached. Glider made a safe outlanding. In that incident, the rudder locked over to one side, so aerodynamic pressure didn't centre it. The pilot wrote a piece for Sailplane & Gliding explaining that he could only fly in large circles and describing how he managed a safe landing. From memory the K13 has springs on the rudder pedals, so that when one cable snapped the springs pulled the other pedal to the floor and thus the rudder to full-on in one direction. I suspect this is true for many other gliders. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Lindsay wrote: Even if there were no springs involved, if a rudder cable parted, and unless the rudder or cable were somehow jammed (probably unlikely), then I think aerodynamic pressure would tend to return the rudder to near neutral - - assuming the pilot removed pressure from the opposite pedal. bumper There was an incident in the UK a year or so back with an ASK13 in which one rudder cable became detached. Glider made a safe outlanding. It happened to the Puchacz at Piako gliding club (near Hamilton, NZ) a few years ago. A safe outlanding was also made, thanks probably to the very very experienced instructor on board. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |