![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:44:44 -0400, john smith wrote
in : And you were dehydrated because you didn't drink enough water! I don't fly without a 1.5 ltr bottle of water. It's essential. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 23:37:18 +0000, Larry Dighera wrote:
Becoming a responsible airman is not really at all akin to becoming a licensed motorist. Why not? I don't mean what is, but what should be. I've seen some awful drivers. Shouldn't the bar be higher than it is? How often, just to a couple of common examples, do driving instructors check on a student's handling of distractions? Or deal with the concept of "personal minimums"? Shouldn't they? - Andrew |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: I know, but it's the kind of simple math that I *should* be able to do in my head. Cruise altitude - target altitude = altitude loss 9,500 - 2,000 = 7,500 altitude loss/500fpm = minutes or [altitude loss/1,000] x 2 7,500/500 = 15 minutes or 7.5 x 2 = 15 minutes minutes x miles per minute = miles 15 x 1.5 = 22.5nm 15 x 2 = 30nm 15 x 2.5 = 37.5nm 15 x 3 = 45nm 90 kts = 1.5 nm/m 120 kts = 2.0 nm/m 150 kts = 2.5 nm/m 180 kts = 3.0 nm/m |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:07:45 -0400, Tim wrote:
Saving 6 hours round trip (approx 40% savings in time) is wonderful. Some people get interested when they hear I'm a pilot, but only because it's an oddity. On the other hand, when I describe my wife and I taking a quick lunch on Nantucket (or some other attractive multi-hour drive), and then playing with our son on the beach, the interest picks up. But that's just the practical side. My wife and I SCUBA too. There's just something about that third dimension that we're not meant to ignore. On the other hand, some people are happy being flatlanders and it's wrong of us to judge that. But it is irksome how some people use their own fear and limits as justification to try to impose those upon others. Is the era of GA over? No, far from it. But we are under attack by small-minded people that fear anyone that doesn't live from fear. Perhaps fear makes people easier to control (ie. vote for me or you'll be nuked by imaginary WMD)? Perhaps some people just cannot stand those that do what they cannot? I don't know. But from reading here, I gather that this attack of the small-minded isn't new. It is our job to stand and fly despite this. To do otherwise is to surrender to tyranny and mediocrity. How fortunate that it's also terrific fun and providing some very practical benefits. - Andrew |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote: If you're not thirsty, you're not dehydrated. Are you a doctor or a sports physiologist? Where did you get that load of crap? I think he made the mistake of inverting the causality in the statement "If you are thirsty then you are dehydrated," which appears to be generally accepted as far as I can tell. Mxsmanic appears to have made a classic blunder in logic: that "If A then B" implies "If B then A." Of course it doesn't. While it appears to be true that by the time you experience thirst you are dehydrated, there appears to be some physiologic lag time after other dehydration symptoms have occurred but before thirst kicks in. So it appears there is a period of time in which you may be dehydrated but are not yet thirsty. Of course sometimes I get a dry mouth working in dusty environments and really need a drink of water. I'd call that being thirsty in a colloquial sense, though it may not match the physiologic meaning. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim writes:
Are you a doctor or a sports physiologist? Neither. Where did you get that load of crap? From medical textbooks. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan writes:
I think he made the mistake of inverting the causality in the statement "If you are thirsty then you are dehydrated," which appears to be generally accepted as far as I can tell. So is the inverse. Thirst is a reliable indicator of dehydration. An absence of thirst is a reliable indicator of proper hydration. While it appears to be true that by the time you experience thirst you are dehydrated, there appears to be some physiologic lag time after other dehydration symptoms have occurred but before thirst kicks in. Only in extraordinarily acute dehydration, which is not a type of dehydration that occurs when flying an aircraft. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim writes:
It is no more expensive that other hobbies or activities. The number of other hobbies and activities that are orders of magnitude less expensive than flying is too great to allow them all to be enumerated here. It takes about 70 hours of flight training to get a private pilot certificate. It takes a pencil and a piece of charcoal to practice art as a hobby. I see no correlation between simulation and real flying. I see no correlation between flying tin cans and flying any other type of aircraft. But perhaps we're both wrong. Perhaps the reluctance of real pilots to welcome you has little to do with your chosen way to spend time (simming/gaming) than it is your clear and often rudely stated discussions about how GA is useless and the pilots of GA aircraft are stupid, ignorant, filthy rich, macho/testosterone filled babies with huge egos. Their reluctance is directly connected to their emotions. Unfortunately, some of those emotions are indeed correlated with stupidity, ignorance, and testosterone, although the correlation is not terribly high. Most pilots I have met do not match the view you have of them. Most of those pilots don't start threads five times a week discussing me here in this newsgroup. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know, but it's the kind of simple math that I *should* be able to do
in my head. Cruise altitude - target altitude = altitude loss 9,500 - 2,000 = 7,500 altitude loss/500fpm = minutes or [altitude loss/1,000] x 2 7,500/500 = 15 minutes or 7.5 x 2 = 15 minutes Right -- and when I'm not hypoxic, that's easy stuff. :-) The rest of what you showed is really unnecessary, as both GPS's show a steady count-down in minutes till arrival... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Tim writes: Are you a doctor or a sports physiologist? Neither. I thought not. Where did you get that load of crap? From medical textbooks. I would look for new medical textbooks. I have experienced dehydration. I was diagnosed as such by doctors. I was not thirsty. I was given IV fluids. Fixed the dehydration. You're wrong on this one. Thirst is an indicator, but it is not true that dehydration must always include a symptom of thirst. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HUD view of a near-miss | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 32 | December 16th 06 11:03 PM |
Come to Minden... we miss you all.. | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | July 1st 06 05:21 AM |
Why Screeners Miss Guns and Knives (and why pilots miss planes and airports) | cjcampbell | Piloting | 2 | January 3rd 06 04:24 AM |
ATC of Near-Miss over BOS | Marco Leon | Piloting | 40 | August 31st 05 01:53 PM |
Miss May 2004 | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 2 | March 21st 04 09:48 PM |