![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
WJRFlyBoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:36:53 -0800, Steve Hix wrote: In article , WJRFlyBoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:56:26 GMT, Steve Foley wrote: "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message ... 1) I passed on answering your questions that honestly aren't worth my effort or the Usenet space. And I will to the same plonk lol Touchy I would say. Well, you *were* pretty rude. Unless you think that blowing off someone because they're too stupid to deal with is good manners. Think about it. I never mention Foley being stupid, No, maybe you didn't state it explicitly, but you certain implied it. Whether or not it was your intent, what you said could reasonably be expected to generate that inference to a lot of readers. I expressed my opinion as you can see above. He took offense which is his perfect prerogative. And you really don't understand why, do you? Or perhaps you're just playing dumb... In your case, either purposefully or not, you have mistated my response to him, time will tell if you have an agenda or honestly mistaken. I have been on and around Usenet since the Deja News days. And that's supposed to be important why, exactly? Think about it. It's clear that in this you didn't exercise much consideration. You can't really believe that calling someone worthless is a neutral act. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:13:24 -0800, Steve Hix wrote:
In article , WJRFlyBoy wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:36:53 -0800, Steve Hix wrote: Thanks for your comments. -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 4:11 am, WJRFlyBoy wrote:
I have been reading the various threads about spins, forced landings, etc and talking with CFIs. The road to a PPL is preset in requirements by FAA. I see that most people are happy to do nothing more than that. Outside of the cost factors, I find this much more than curious considering the consequences. You can get killed, that one keeps jumping out at me ![]() I am asking the group for assistance in developing a list of instructional and solo experiences, testing, mandatory reading.....if you ran the FAA, what would you require in a near-perfect world that a PPL would require? I am a zero-hour wannabe pilot FYI For a start, I won't begin my first instruction until I can do the following: Pass all tests with a 95% minimum Handle with ease all traffic control and similar commo Dissect the anatomy of my training aircraft Understand what and how the instrumentation works (shortcomings included) Own all the fundamentally necessary flight gear (i.e carry-ons in flight bag or on person) Obtain hours in flight simulation More...enough for now. TIA. The group is an extremely valuable resource; I sincerely doubt I would be so focused and confident without your past, present and future work here. -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! Poor judgment kills far more than an 89% on a written... Take the good advice here and learn from a competent CFI. Own all the fundamentally necessary flight gear (i.e carry-ons in flight bag or on person) This one takes years... |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During my primary training the biggest difficulty I had was sensing the
proper hight above runway where to begin the flare. I was really stuck there for almost a month, either flaring too high, or landing flat. My instructor was pretty much desperate, and I started thinking that I'm perhaps lacking some physical ability to do that right. What I did was, I set up MSFS with a projector and a wall-mounted screen in my room, put the projector far enough to get the image of the exact 1:1 scale of what I see out of cockpit, and set up the plane on a very short final, perhaps 10-12 seconds before touchdown. I was then practicing the flare with this setup; I did around fifteen hundred flares in one week. That helped me tremendously. I'm pretty sure that probably there were other ways to break this plateau I had, but this one worked for me. I hardly ever fired MSFS ever since, I got so sick of it ![]() Andrey In rec.aviation.piloting Dudley Henriques wrote: [...] part of that opinion by not including that I see no objection at all to the sim being used BEFORE dual commences as well as after solo, so the actual envelope I have always stressed constitutes ommission of the simulator between the first hour of dual instruction and solo. After solo, the sim can again be used and has specific advantages. [...] |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.student WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:29:35 -0600, Michael Ash wrote: I am asking the group for assistance in developing a list of instructional and solo experiences, testing, mandatory reading.....if you ran the FAA, what would you require in a near-perfect world that a PPL would require? I am a zero-hour wannabe pilot FYI Outlandings and assembly/disassembly. The PTS covers both in extremely light detail. I would like to see much greater detail applied to both. In particular, I had never assembled or disassembled a glider, aside from helping to hold up wingtips and such, until after my checkride. I think every student should be taken to the point where he can be the lead on assembly or disassembly, at least for one particular type. He should also be able to walk through an outlanding from start to finish, including dealing with locals and police and handling the retrieve crew. Of course this is pretty glider-specific. The equivalent for "normal" flying would, I imagine, be how to travel with a plane, how to deal with courtesy cars and arrange transportation at the destination and so forth, which I've seen talked about here as lamentably un-discussed during training. lol I am told this is "glider-boy" downspeak. ![]() I can assure you that it is no such thing. I merely related some things which I thought were lacking in my training, and compared them to deficiencies I'd seen talked about in here. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrey Serbinenko wrote:
During my primary training the biggest difficulty I had was sensing the proper hight above runway where to begin the flare. I was really stuck there for almost a month, either flaring too high, or landing flat. My instructor was pretty much desperate, and I started thinking that I'm perhaps lacking some physical ability to do that right. What I did was, I set up MSFS with a projector and a wall-mounted screen in my room, put the projector far enough to get the image of the exact 1:1 scale of what I see out of cockpit, and set up the plane on a very short final, perhaps 10-12 seconds before touchdown. I was then practicing the flare with this setup; I did around fifteen hundred flares in one week. That helped me tremendously. I'm pretty sure that probably there were other ways to break this plateau I had, but this one worked for me. I hardly ever fired MSFS ever since, I got so sick of it ![]() Andrey In rec.aviation.piloting Dudley Henriques wrote: [...] part of that opinion by not including that I see no objection at all to the sim being used BEFORE dual commences as well as after solo, so the actual envelope I have always stressed constitutes ommission of the simulator between the first hour of dual instruction and solo. After solo, the sim can again be used and has specific advantages. [...] A very simple instructor technique for a student having the problem you had is for the instructor to "fly" the airplane up the runway holding it in the landing attitude just inches off the ground. By doing this, the student gets a long look at the correct visual cue both over the nose and peripherally for the airplane in a landing attitude. Also, as the airplane is positioned for takeoff and before the throttle is opened, the student should be told to look over the nose and remember that visual cue. This is the cue that will be seen as the aircraft touches down again. There are many ways in the airplane to solve the problem you had. I would never in a million years allow any student of mine to use MSFS to solve the issue you were having. -- Dudley Henriques |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:10:07 -0600, Michael Ash wrote:
Outlandings and assembly/disassembly. The PTS covers both in extremely light detail. I would like to see much greater detail applied to both. In particular, I had never assembled or disassembled a glider, aside from helping to hold up wingtips and such, until after my checkride. I think every student should be taken to the point where he can be the lead on assembly or disassembly, at least for one particular type. He should also be able to walk through an outlanding from start to finish, including dealing with locals and police and handling the retrieve crew. Of course this is pretty glider-specific. The equivalent for "normal" flying would, I imagine, be how to travel with a plane, how to deal with courtesy cars and arrange transportation at the destination and so forth, which I've seen talked about here as lamentably un-discussed during training. lol I am told this is "glider-boy" downspeak. ![]() I can assure you that it is no such thing. I merely related some things which I thought were lacking in my training, and compared them to deficiencies I'd seen talked about in here. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software Maybe I misunderstood. You are relating the advanced disassembly of a glider with post flight travel arrangements of motorized aircraft as comparable deficiencies in training? -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.aviation.student WJRFlyBoy wrote:
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:10:07 -0600, Michael Ash wrote: Outlandings and assembly/disassembly. The PTS covers both in extremely light detail. I would like to see much greater detail applied to both. In particular, I had never assembled or disassembled a glider, aside from helping to hold up wingtips and such, until after my checkride. I think every student should be taken to the point where he can be the lead on assembly or disassembly, at least for one particular type. He should also be able to walk through an outlanding from start to finish, including dealing with locals and police and handling the retrieve crew. Of course this is pretty glider-specific. The equivalent for "normal" flying would, I imagine, be how to travel with a plane, how to deal with courtesy cars and arrange transportation at the destination and so forth, which I've seen talked about here as lamentably un-discussed during training. lol I am told this is "glider-boy" downspeak. ![]() I can assure you that it is no such thing. I merely related some things which I thought were lacking in my training, and compared them to deficiencies I'd seen talked about in here. Maybe I misunderstood. You are relating the advanced disassembly of a glider with post flight travel arrangements of motorized aircraft as comparable deficiencies in training? Sounds like you are unfamiliar with glider assembly/disassembly. There is nothing "advanced" about it. It's something that all glider pilots are allowed to do and all should be able to do. On the average day when my club operates with good soaring conditions, there are several gliders assembled in the morning and disassembled in the afternoon after the day's flying is done. The average glider takes two or three people 15-20 minutes to assemble or disassemble. And yes, I am comparing it to the non-flying portions of traveling using a powered aircraft. If you feel the comparison is not apt, perhaps you could elaborate. -- Michael Ash Rogue Amoeba Software |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WJRFlyBoy schrieb:
You are relating the advanced disassembly of a glider There is nothing advanced in assembling and disassembling a glider. Most glider pilots are doing this before and after each flight. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bearing and Course, differences? | Allen Smith | Piloting | 27 | September 2nd 07 03:28 PM |
Rep vs. Dem Differences | Jim Weir | Piloting | 212 | September 8th 04 04:02 PM |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
ASW 20, ASW 20B, ASW 20C DIFFERENCES | Ventus B | Soaring | 8 | July 18th 04 10:28 AM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Products | 1 | March 6th 04 06:12 AM |