Mxsmanic , IFR sensations, and some other stuff

Mxsmanic wrote:
gatt writes:

Dudley, I trust with absolute confidence that I'll learn from this
discussion from you so I'll refer to what I mentioned earlier in terms
of ignoring physical sensations in IMC and see what you think?

You're demonstrating a poor attitude.


If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with absolutely
zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask you.

You don't want to follow the rules, and so you come

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

If you are in IMC, you're IFR, and if you're IFR, you should _already_ be
fully aware of what all the instruments on the panel are saying.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.
Hell, you augured outside of Telluride in a freakin' flight simulator.
That's funny, 'cause I flew it in the same software and didn't have that
problem. It's easy; you're not even a competent Flight Simulator geek.

He http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0805/06920LD9.PDF

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

-c

gatt writes:

If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with absolutely
zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask you.

I don't qualify. Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.

Why not? Some of them have dangerous ideas.

Hell, you augured outside of Telluride in a freakin' flight simulator.
That's funny, 'cause I flew it in the same software and didn't have that
problem. It's easy; you're not even a competent Flight Simulator geek.

A simulator might be a better play to practice IFR, if you haven't
internalized the necessity of relying on instruments.

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

Avoid IMC.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

gatt writes:

If I want the opinion of a non-pilot video-game addict with
absolutely zero hours of actual flight training or time, I'll ask
you.

I don't qualify. Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose
to ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody
cites something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

Don't presume to talk to instrument-rated pilots about flying IMC.

Why not? Some of them have dangerous ideas.


No, they don;t. you do.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote:

Besides, I'll offer my opinion without prompting.

That doesn't make it worth two turds on my lawn. Anybody can do that.
You're the only one offering opinions out here that's a fake pilot


Nobody said anything about "rules," but I did in fact quote the
authoritative FAA Airplane Flying Handbook repeatedly, and you chose to
ignore all of that. Funny how that works out. Anytime anybody cites
something authoritative, you ignore it.

Misinterpretations of the book will not help you in the air.

I logged 1.1 hours in the actual sky last night. You?

Bye, now. I'm going flying.

Avoid IMC.

Not necessary. I completed an Instrument Proficiency Check three weeks
ago. I wasn't even due for it, just did it anyway. Six different
approaches, radar vectoring, unusual attitude recovery, etc.

You should try it sometime.

-c