A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA Audit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 13th 04, 07:35 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Hilton" wrote in message hlink.net...
Roger Long wrote:
Trust no one. When you are PIC, the buck stops with you.


In your opinion, is it really feasible/practical for a renter pilot to
ensure 100% that the aircraft is airworthy? By this, I mean, go through the
logs, ensure every AD has been addressed including the recurring ones,
verify the W&B ensuring that nothing has been added or removed etc, the
signatures are all legal and valid, no pages are missing or have been
inserted, every part on the aircraft is 'legal', etc etc. I've read that
pilots do this when buying aircraft and it takes them days or longer.


Most FBOs put the annual time and 100 hr time on the renter's booklet.
I believe the NTSB has said that this is good enough, if the FBO
actually lies about the annual there, then that's just fraud on their
part (if they can lie there they can lie in the logs). Our FBO puts
copies of the inspections in the rental booklet for that plane so you
have it ready for checkrides. It makes showing the required
inspections easy because if you miss one, you'll notice something else
in the book you didn't tell the DE about.

-Robert
  #12  
Old August 16th 04, 08:15 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert M. Gary wrote:
Most FBOs put the annual time and 100 hr time on the renter's booklet.
I believe the NTSB has said that this is good enough,...


If you can provide an NTSB URL or something similar, I'd really like to see
it. I'm not saying it's not true, I just don't see how this doesn't
circumvent the "PIC must ensure the aircraft is airworthy" FAR.

Hilton


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.