If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Peter R. wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: They are human beings, and their jobs are being outsourced. Spare me the "it's not their fault" argument. A true professional is able to keep his/her personal issues from interfering with the job, especially if this job has some influence on the safety of others. No argument from me. That is why the airlines and the pros never use FSS. If you want professional service you pay for it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Sam Spade wrote:
No argument from me. That is why the airlines and the pros never use FSS. If you want professional service you pay for it. I thought we were paying for this service, no? Isn't that where a portion of our 100LL taxes are being directed? However, I see your point: We get what we pay for. -- Peter |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Peter R. wrote:
Sam Spade wrote: No argument from me. That is why the airlines and the pros never use FSS. If you want professional service you pay for it. I thought we were paying for this service, no? Isn't that where a portion of our 100LL taxes are being directed? However, I see your point: We get what we pay for. Right, you're not paying very much for that service. FSS is used primarily by light aircraft pilots. If user fees come about I suspect the FSS will eventually fold. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Now I am not a meteorologist by trade or university, but I am pretty
confident that the level three and higher returns showing up on radar ahead of this cold front today were not falling from a stratus layer. Don't be so confident. I recall one trip from Destin back to Houston where I nearly drove a controller who was just as certain as you are into a conniption fit. It so happened he was wrong too. I was flying my PA-30, which doesn't have RADAR of any sort (not even the XM kind) but does have a good Stormscope. I had already deviated North to avoid an area of convection (the screen was lit up) but headed West once I was North of the activity. The controller almost did not allow me to turn West - he insisted I would be flying through an area of Level II and III returns, with small areas of IV (that's red) in an area covered by a convective SIGMET. And he was right. However, all the actual convective activity was now South of me. I flew through some moderate and even heavy rain - with no turbulence to speak of. Nothing worse than occasional light chop. I flew in and between stratus layers. The controller was checking on me every few minutes, asking if I needed to deviate - because all he had was the RADAR and the SIGMET. There really are times when you can have areas of yellow and red, in conditions that look like they favor convective activity, and in fact right next to convective activity, which are nonetheless stratiform and quite comfortable to penetrate. The key is knowing that convection is not there. Now how one is to know that without a good 'spherics device is beyond me. Michael |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Michael wrote:
There really are times when you can have areas of yellow and red, in conditions that look like they favor convective activity, and in fact right next to convective activity, which are nonetheless stratiform and quite comfortable to penetrate. The key is knowing that convection is not there. Now how one is to know that without a good 'spherics device is beyond me. While I do see your point (and always have sided with you on your recurring theme of getting proper utility out of an aircraft), this particular flight was a return leg of an Angel Flight mission; it was not a mission critical freight dog flight. I certainly don't see any harm in erring on the side of caution in wanting to stay clear of level three and higher returns, especially when there is an advancing cold front in the area. Whether these particular returns contained destructive turbulence or not was not something I wanted to test. All of the weather conditions that day suggested they could be convective and that was enough for me. Additionally, my point in starting this thread was to question whether it is really the FSS specialist's job to imply that I am being too conservative when asking about the colorful radar returns? IMO, absolutely not. By the way, I recall one flight a couple of Septembers ago where the red returns were due to a local radar being set too sensitive for the falling *wet snow*. In this particular briefing, the FSS specialist was very good. He didn't imply that I was too concerned about seeing red. Instead, he investigated my concerns by pulling up the metars from the area, spotted snow being reported, then concluding that it was a radar sensitivity issue, not convective activity, that was causing the reds. -- Peter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
"Michael" wrote: There really are times when you can have areas of yellow and red, in conditions that look like they favor convective activity, and in fact right next to convective activity, which are nonetheless stratiform and quite comfortable to penetrate. The key is knowing that convection is not there. Now how one is to know that without a good 'spherics device is beyond me. WxWorx. Red precip without lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic2.jpg Red precip with lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic8.jpg http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic9.jpg It is not real time like 'spherics, but it is timely enough to have tactical value. I have seen it accurately show lightning where there was not yet any precip. depicted. I've used it--coincidentally in the Destin area--to penetrate weather that ATC had warned me about. The little inverted triangles are METARs that are very useful in verifying the nature of NEXRAD returns. Both have their limitations. The optimum situation would be to have 'spherics *and* satellite. Having to choose, I'll take the XM weather because it does so much more. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Dan Luke wrote:
WxWorx. Red precip without lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic2.jpg Red precip with lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic8.jpg Nice. WSI downlinked weather displayed on a Garmin MX20 moving map: Will never display the lightning data now offered by WSI, thanks to the feud between these two companies. Between WSI and TIS, I don't know how many more technological dead-ends I can choose in one lifetime. -- Peter |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
Peter R. wrote:
Dan Luke wrote: WxWorx. Red precip without lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic2.jpg Red precip with lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic8.jpg Nice. WSI downlinked weather displayed on a Garmin MX20 moving map: Will never display the lightning data now offered by WSI, thanks to the feud between these two companies. Between WSI and TIS, I don't know how many more technological dead-ends I can choose in one lifetime. How about VHS and Beta Max all over again with the emerging Hi Def DVD formats. These folks love to hate each other and, in the process, screw the consumer over until there is no tomorrow. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
"Sam Spade" wrote: Between WSI and TIS, I don't know how many more technological dead-ends I can choose in one lifetime. How about VHS and Beta Max all over again with the emerging Hi Def DVD formats. These folks love to hate each other and, in the process, screw the consumer over until there is no tomorrow. There is a real chance consumers will react to both with a big yawn. Home videotape recording was a revolutionary product that everyone wanted. On the other hand, the new DVD formats offer so small an increment in display quality over a good 480-P player on an HDTV screen, I think few people will care enough to upgrade. At least they can afford to wait and see which new format survives. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Are you worried about all those non-green colors on the radar?"
"Peter R." wrote: Dan Luke wrote: WxWorx. Red precip without lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic2.jpg Red precip with lightning: http://www.seaerospace.com/garmin/396pic8.jpg Nice. WSI downlinked weather displayed on a Garmin MX20 moving map: Will never display the lightning data now offered by WSI, thanks to the feud between these two companies. Ouch. This is bad for all of us, as there is virtually no competition for WxWorx/Garmin. -- Dan "The future has actually been here for a while, it's just not readily available to everyone." - some guy at MIT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|