A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th 11, 08:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Some Other Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion

Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
http://www.flixxy.com/besler-steam-airplane.htm


Cool! Interesting how easy prop reversal is, which makes sense since it's a
steam engine. The Wikipedia page claims that it was capable of STOL
operation since the prop could be used for braking on landing.

  #2  
Old January 16th 11, 09:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion

On Jan 16, 3:42*pm, Some Other Guy wrote:
Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
http://www.flixxy.com/besler-steam-airplane.htm


Cool! *Interesting how easy prop reversal is, which makes sense since it's a
steam engine. *The Wikipedia page claims that it was capable of STOL
operation since the prop could be used for braking on landing.


Larger prop driven airplanes did not reverse their props, but went
into beta range, meaning the pitch was negative, in effect pushing the
air forward, not back. Some complex singles also had beta range
capability for their prop pitch. It makes for shorter landings, does
not make for shorter take offs though.




  #3  
Old January 16th 11, 11:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion

On Jan 17, 9:42*am, Some Other Guy wrote:
Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
http://www.flixxy.com/besler-steam-airplane.htm


Cool! *Interesting how easy prop reversal is, which makes sense since it's a
steam engine. *The Wikipedia page claims that it was capable of STOL
operation since the prop could be used for braking on landing.


Wow. Of course the jet prop does the same
  #4  
Old January 24th 11, 01:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Some Other Guy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 66
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion

a wrote:

On Jan 16, 3:42 pm, Some Other Guy wrote:
Howard Eisenhauer wrote:
http://www.flixxy.com/besler-steam-airplane.htm


Cool! Interesting how easy prop reversal is, which makes sense since
it's a steam engine. The Wikipedia page claims that it was capable of
STOL operation since the prop could be used for braking on landing.


Larger prop driven airplanes did not reverse their props, but went
into beta range, meaning the pitch was negative, in effect pushing the
air forward, not back. Some complex singles also had beta range
capability for their prop pitch. It makes for shorter landings, does
not make for shorter take offs though.


But sites like

http://www.flyingkettle.com/besler6.htm

claim that the engine really did reverse:

Each time as the machine swooped down and the landing wheels touched
ground, the pilot pulled back a small lever at the side of the cockpit
and the steam engine at the nose of the plane instantly reversed,
whirling the propeller backwards, creating a powerful braking effect
which reduced the landing runs to a very short distance.

I have only run toy steam engines at home, but I do know that they are just
as happy to run one direction as another. I have never imagined one flying,
though.

  #5  
Old January 24th 11, 03:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion


"Some Other Guy" wrote
But sites like

http://www.flyingkettle.com/besler6.htm

claim that the engine really did reverse:

Each time as the machine swooped down and the landing wheels touched
ground, the pilot pulled back a small lever at the side of the cockpit
and the steam engine at the nose of the plane instantly reversed,
whirling the propeller backwards, creating a powerful braking effect
which reduced the landing runs to a very short distance.

I have only run toy steam engines at home, but I do know that they are
just
as happy to run one direction as another. I have never imagined one
flying,
though.


I saw a video once of a guy with a steam powered plane. One thing he did
was back up on the ramp. It was funny to see steam blowing through the prop
backwards, the prop then stop and go the right way.
--
Jim in NC

  #6  
Old January 24th 11, 04:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Logajan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,958
Default Locomotivation will Replace Internal Combustion

"Morgans" wrote:
"Some Other Guy" wrote
But sites like

http://www.flyingkettle.com/besler6.htm

claim that the engine really did reverse:

Each time as the machine swooped down and the landing wheels
touched ground, the pilot pulled back a small lever at the side of
the cockpit and the steam engine at the nose of the plane instantly
reversed, whirling the propeller backwards, creating a powerful
braking effect which reduced the landing runs to a very short
distance.

I have only run toy steam engines at home, but I do know that they
are just
as happy to run one direction as another. I have never imagined one
flying,
though.


I saw a video once of a guy with a steam powered plane. One thing he
did
was back up on the ramp. It was funny to see steam blowing through
the prop backwards, the prop then stop and go the right way.


There is a a video on youtube that shows the Besler steam plane backing up
(starting around 2:45 into the video):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw6NFmcnW-8

Thought this was a neat related video, showing a tiny steam driven RC-sized
prop:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOU3DBQGlzA

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion Mark Piloting 123 December 23rd 10 11:56 PM
Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion Mark Piloting 81 September 22nd 10 05:40 PM
H2 Combustion-Booster Claimed [email protected] Home Built 44 October 12th 05 04:14 AM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
high-speed camera view of a piston intake, combustion, exhaust R.Hubbell General Aviation 0 February 20th 04 03:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.