If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
"Jay Honeck" wrote Right. Of course, in the US, Jet-A (diesel) is just about the same price, or even a bit higher, than avgas. Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. It's also why Thielert hasn't gained any traction here. How do you come to that conclusion? Jet fuel is lower on the distillation scale, and should be easier to distill from oil, and get a bit more per barrel than Avgas. Add to that economy of scale, and it should be much less expensive. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
Right. Of course, in the US, Jet-A (diesel) is just about the same
price, or even a bit higher, than avgas. Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. It's also why Thielert hasn't gained any traction here. How do you come to that conclusion? Jet fuel is lower on the distillation scale, and should be easier to distill from oil, and get a bit more per barrel than Avgas. Add to that economy of scale, and it should be much less expensive. Agreed. I was referring to the British penchant for taxing the crap out of avgas (the fuel of hte rich) and leaving Jet-A (the fuel of the proletariat) pretty much alone. You're right, Jet-A in this country *should* be much cheaper than avgas. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
On 16 Aug 2006 22:36:37 -0700, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: I was referring to the British penchant for taxing the crap out of avgas (the fuel of hte rich) and leaving Jet-A (the fuel of the proletariat) pretty much alone. You're right, Jet-A in this country *should* be much cheaper than avgas. At one of the airports that I refuel at (T00) when I'm not using mogas, the current price on 100LL is $3.84 whereas Jet-A is $2.96... The best price I see currently in Texas is $3.07 for 100LL and $2.39 for Jet-A at EBG... Hell, $2.39 is cheaper than I can buy diesel for here in Texas... If I had a diesel pickup and lived over there, I would probably be running Jet-A in it... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
Jay Honeck wrote:
You're right, Jet-A in this country *should* be much cheaper than avgas. The "expert" on the cost of Jet A vs 100LL has spoken. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Right. Of course, in the US, Jet-A (diesel) is just about the same price, or even a bit higher, than avgas. Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. It's also why Thielert hasn't gained any traction here. How do you come to that conclusion? Jet fuel is lower on the distillation scale, and should be easier to distill from oil, and get a bit more per barrel than Avgas. Add to that economy of scale, and it should be much less expensive. Agreed. I was referring to the British penchant for taxing the crap out of avgas (the fuel of hte rich) and leaving Jet-A (the fuel of the proletariat) pretty much alone. At WVI Jet-A is the fuel of the rich and avgas is the fuel of the proletariat. Howard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
Jay Honeck wrote:
Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. Isn't part of the point of a government to do social engineering? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
In article ,
"Anno v. Heimburg" wrote: Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. Isn't part of the point of a government to do social engineering? No. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
"Anno v. Heimburg" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: Which is, of course, as it should be, without government social engineering. Isn't part of the point of a government to do social engineering? No |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
Anno v. Heimburg wrote:
Isn't part of the point of a government to do social engineering? For the governments of countries lacking a large degree of personal freedoms, yes. For governments such as exists (or should I say 'used to exist') in the United States, absolutley not. It has been this lack of social engineering by government policy that has made the US an economic superpower in the span of 100 years. The Soviet Union was an example of the failure of a government dedicated to the concept of social engineering in as many years. None the less, it seems we are running headlong toward the same end. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
$640.00 to fill the tanks...
None the less, it seems we are running headlong toward the same
end. The lure -- and illusory rewards -- of bribing us with our own money are far too great for any country to long resist. If you want to see America's future, all you need to do is visit any inner city convenience store that sells lottery tickets, right after the first of the month. It's really quiet pathetic... -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flt. 800 Anniversay: Exploding Fuel Tanks STILL In Airline Planes!!! | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 3 | July 24th 06 06:06 PM |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
Fuel Tanks C172 | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | May 2nd 06 05:45 AM |
F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 08:40 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |