A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 7th 17, 03:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
MNLou
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

Hi Chris -

61 flights and 96 hours in my PW-5 - mostly in MN. I can only remember once that the tail lifted in a thermal due to a vertical gust.

There were no issues at all. The PW-5 just flew itself out of the gust and continued circling.

The PW-5 is the easiest theramlling glider I've flown.

Lou
  #12  
Old September 8th 17, 04:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

I didn't mention gust direction. I have been assuming it was a vertical gust lifting the tail, but I have no direct evidence for that.

In a nutshell, the comments offered seem to boil down to the following:
a) check flight habits for unintended movements
b) pull stick back to reduce tail-up pitching and roll into the thermal so indicated
c) ignore it
d) haven't seen/experienced it
e) moving CG forward would exacerbate the rocking effect of the tail-up pitching

I think about the rocking of a sailboat-- the retired coach says to move everyone toward the keel when dealing with waves so that the boat can rock fore and aft more easily (and thus lose less speed by bobbing a little more with the waves instead of slamming hard through the waves). From there I extrapolate that a wider weight spread toward the edges (fore and aft) can increase inertia and slow down oscillation about a central point.

Seems the thing to do is to add ballast on the next flight, hope for strong thermal activity, and report back to the thread. More weight will inevitably move the CG forward; can't move myself backward or I wouldn't be able to reach the controls!

Thanks,
Chris

  #13  
Old September 8th 17, 03:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 394
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

Chris,
Some posters were confused over the title you used......believe you made a common mistake!
An aircraft pitches around its lateral axis, rolls around its longitudinal axis and yaws around its vertical axis.
Hope this helps,
JJ
  #14  
Old September 9th 17, 05:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

Perhaps! What I describe is a pitch of the nose down and the tail up. Longitudinal seesawing (pitching) at the lateral axis.
  #15  
Old September 9th 17, 12:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 21:08:42 -0700, larsonchristina wrote:

Perhaps! What I describe is a pitch of the nose down and the tail up.
Longitudinal seesawing (pitching) at the lateral axis.


All aircraft entering a thermal will do this, some more noticeably than
others.

Reasoning: as the glider flies into the thermal it enters a rising air
mass and the further it moves into this air mass, the faster the vertical
movement becomes. The effect on the glider is that its effective AOA is
reduced by the air's vertical velocity (draw a vector diagram and this
becomes obvious), which in turn means that the wing no longer supports
all the glider's weight. The effect of trim means that the glider will
automatically pitch down and speed up to regain lift.

The combination of this small forward acceleration plus the upward
acceleration as to enters progressively faster air is what you feel as
"the surge" when you enter a thermal.

What you see and feel depends on what you're flying. In my Libelle I
don't particularly notice the pitch down, and anyway it may be masked as
I'm pitching up to slow down from inter-thermal cruise speed or even
faster flight through the sink surrounding the thermal, but the surge
forward and up is quite easy to feel.

The most obvious demonstration of this that I've seen was shown by an A/1
competition model glider of around 4 feet span, even when it was 50-60 m
overhead. When entering a strong thermal it would pitch down quite
rapidly and about as steeply as a helicopter does after takeoff when its
pilot is in a hurry to get moving before returning to its normal trimmed
attitude as it entered the core of the thermal. Like all free flight
models of its era, its trim was set before launch and remained so
throughout the flight, so this strong pitch down was not due to trim
changes.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
  #16  
Old September 9th 17, 06:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 7:46:30 AM UTC-4, Martin Gregorie wrote:

Reasoning: as the glider flies into the thermal it enters a rising air
mass and the further it moves into this air mass, the faster the vertical
movement becomes. The effect on the glider is that its effective AOA is
reduced by the air's vertical velocity (draw a vector diagram and this
becomes obvious)...


Seems the opposite to me. The rising air hits the wings from below, and thus at a higher AOA. This increases the lift on both the wing and the tail, but more so at the tail. This is what positive stability means. The glider then behaves just like after raising the nose momentarily and then letting go of the stick: it pitches nose down. It's not the trimmed speed it is seeking per se, it is the trimmed AOA. Thus in the thermal entry it pitches nose-down despite the speed being normal. Once the glider accelerates upwards due to the rising air, the vertical motion relative to the air returns to normal, and the normal pitch attitude relative to the horizon will be restored on its own. The more pitch-stable the glider (and yes this is called "longitudinal stability" IIRC?), the stronger this pitching effect should be. Maybe that's why I haven't noticed it in my gliders, since I have the CG near the rear end of the range, i.e., weak stability.
  #17  
Old September 9th 17, 06:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 7:46:30 AM UTC-4, Martin Gregorie wrote:
All aircraft entering a thermal will do this, some more noticeably than
others.

Reasoning: as the glider flies into the thermal it enters a rising air
mass and the further it moves into this air mass, the faster the vertical
movement becomes. The effect on the glider is that its effective AOA is
reduced by the air's vertical velocity ...


Seems the opposite to me. The rising air hits the wings from below, and thus at a higher AOA. This increases the lift on both the wing and the tail, but more so at the tail. ("More so" in the sense of the strength of the resulting pitching moments around the CG.) This is what positive stability means. The glider then behaves just like after raising the nose momentarily and then letting go of the stick: it pitches nose down. It's not the trimmed speed it is seeking per se, it is the trimmed AOA. Thus in the thermal entry it pitches nose-down despite the speed being normal. Once the glider accelerates upwards due to the rising air, the vertical motion relative to the air returns to normal, and the normal pitch attitude relative to the horizon will be restored on its own. The more pitch-stable the glider (and yes this is called "longitudinal stability" IIRC?), the stronger this pitching effect should be. Maybe that's why I haven't noticed it in my gliders, since I have the CG near the rear end of the range, i.e., weak stability..
  #18  
Old September 9th 17, 11:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 10:25:20 -0700, moshe.braner wrote:

On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 7:46:30 AM UTC-4, Martin Gregorie
wrote:
All aircraft entering a thermal will do this, some more noticeably than
others.

Reasoning: as the glider flies into the thermal it enters a rising air
mass and the further it moves into this air mass, the faster the
vertical movement becomes. The effect on the glider is that its
effective AOA is reduced by the air's vertical velocity ...


Seems the opposite to me. The rising air hits the wings from below, and
thus at a higher AOA.

If it was a body of air all rising at the same speed I'd agree, but in as
it enters a thermal the vertical velocity will be increasing as the
glider heads for the core, IOW its facing a continous disturbance which
has two components. One is the vertical velocity that the glider has
acquired from the air its just passed through. The second is the effect
of flying into air with a still higher vertical velocity.

("More so" in the sense of the strength of the resulting pitching
moments around the CG.) This is what positive stability means.

If it was in a parcel of air with the same vertical velocity I'd agree
with you, but it ain't: its flying onto steadily increasing vertical
velocity as it approaches the thermal core, so if things are as you
describe, you'd expect the glider to be pitching up. As that's not what
we see and feel, there must be something else acting on it, which I think
is the effect of flying into an increasing velocity gradient is to reduce
the effective AOA of the wing. Of course in reality it affects both wing
and tail, but its effect on the wing is a little bigger because the wing
gets to the higher velocity rising air before the tail does. Granted its
a small effect, but I think its enough to cause the nose to drop/tail to
rise.

It's not the trimmed speed it is seeking per se, it is the trimmed AOA.

Yes, you're right there. I should have made that clearer.

the stronger this pitching effect should be. Maybe
that's why I haven't noticed it in my gliders, since I have the CG near
the rear end of the range, i.e., weak stability.

Yes, that makes sense. My CG is pretty much in the middle of the
permitted range.

The force set up in the model will also be different: free flight gliders
normally have the CG at 52-55% of the wing chord, use a lifting section
on the tailplane and, yes, they are stable with a lifting tail. Almost
all designs operate with the wing at a Cl of around 1.2 and the tail at a
Cl of around 0.2. This puts the wing at an AOA of about 4 degrees more
than the tail, which keeps this layout stable with fast vertical upset
recovery. The tail is much bigger than on a sailplane - about 15-18% of
the wing area and, as a nice to have, most of the favoured tail sections
give minimum drag at a Cl of 0.2 - a nice bonus, since the tail is also
doing work against gravity as well as keeping the glider stable.



--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
  #19  
Old September 14th 17, 02:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

So I increased the ballast weight in the PW-5 from parachute + 20 pounds to parachute + 40 pounds. The pitch stability increased noticeably, i.e. uncommanded nose-down excursions diminished.

Thanks all; I've enjoyed reading about model gliders and changes upon entering thermals.
  #20  
Old September 14th 17, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 624
Default PW-5 longitudinal pitch oscillation

On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 6:10:58 PM UTC-7, wrote:
So I increased the ballast weight in the PW-5 from parachute + 20 pounds to parachute + 40 pounds. The pitch stability increased noticeably, i.e. uncommanded nose-down excursions diminished.

Thanks all; I've enjoyed reading about model gliders and changes upon entering thermals.


In my only flight in the PeeWee had hoped to do spins.
Couldn't get it to stall, even accelerated, so gave up on spins.
That was with no nose weight. Perhaps it could use tail weight?
Like the OP, with way forward C/G, didn't notice any tendency to oscillate in pitch. It still climbed well, don't ask about cruise.
Did notice turbulence perhaps from the large access hole in the horizontal stab. Now there is no World Class and associated rules, that design problem could be fixed with mylar.
Jim
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Older Cobra trailer brake oscillation Brian Bange[_2_] Soaring 9 March 10th 09 08:41 PM
Wing Bending Oscillation jcarlyle Soaring 18 February 21st 06 05:37 PM
$30,000 pitch links Stuart Fields Home Built 3 January 16th 06 03:13 AM
$30,000 pitch links Stuart Fields Rotorcraft 7 January 15th 06 08:00 PM
Propellor pitch ... Bob Noel Owning 2 July 29th 03 04:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.