If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
I'm doing some research, trying to find information on airplanes with
counter-rotating props, but I'm getting a lot of junk hits from articles that use "counter-rotating" when they should mean "contra-rotating". I was always taught that "contra-rotating" was when you had two sets of blades spinning from the same hub, as in this: http://tinyurl.com/vxu9a and "counter-rotating" meant two different engines on a twin, each spinning in opposite directions, ala the Seneca and Twin Comanche. But according to google, more than half of the instances of "counter-rotating" are used to describe "contra-rotating". Are all those people wrong, or is the term interchangeable? (by the way, I'm trying to compile a list of counter-rotating twins, if anyone knows of any that are not listed he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter...ing_propellers please post) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
Yea,
The Wright Flyer. Karl "Curator" N185KG "buttman" wrote in message ups.com... I'm doing some research, trying to find information on airplanes with counter-rotating props, but I'm getting a lot of junk hits from articles that use "counter-rotating" when they should mean "contra-rotating". I was always taught that "contra-rotating" was when you had two sets of blades spinning from the same hub, as in this: http://tinyurl.com/vxu9a and "counter-rotating" meant two different engines on a twin, each spinning in opposite directions, ala the Seneca and Twin Comanche. But according to google, more than half of the instances of "counter-rotating" are used to describe "contra-rotating". Are all those people wrong, or is the term interchangeable? (by the way, I'm trying to compile a list of counter-rotating twins, if anyone knows of any that are not listed he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter...ing_propellers please post) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
Counter-rotating: prop tips rotate inboard
Contra-rotating: prop tips rotate outboard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeableterms?
Counter-rotating: you have to run to keep up with the cash register.
Contra-rotating: you have to run to keep up with the sales people. Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
Counter rotating props are on two engine and shafts, they
rotate both clock and counter clockwise. On the P38 the blades rotated away from the fuselage. Modern practice is to have the blades rotate toward the fuselage and thus have the lowest Vmc. Contra-rotating is having two propellers on the same shaft rotating in opposite directions to cancel torque effect and gyroscopic forces. "john smith" wrote in message ... | Counter-rotating: prop tips rotate inboard | | Contra-rotating: prop tips rotate outboard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:21:53 -0600, Jim Macklin wrote:
On the P38 the blades rotated away from the fuselage. Modern practice is to have the blades rotate toward the fuselage and thus have the lowest Vmc. Kind of depends upon your point of reference, doesn't it? No matter what, the props are going to rotate towards the fuselage... It just depends upon whether your point of reference is the top or the bottom of the fuselage... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
P-factor and rotation is always, by convention, based on the
top blade moving downward. "Grumman-581" wrote in message news | On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:21:53 -0600, Jim Macklin wrote: | On the P38 the blades rotated away from the fuselage. | Modern practice is to have the blades rotate toward | the fuselage and thus have the lowest Vmc. | | Kind of depends upon your point of reference, doesn't it? No matter what, | the props are going to rotate towards the fuselage... It just depends upon | whether your point of reference is the top or the bottom of the fuselage... | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... P-factor and rotation is always, by convention, based on the top blade moving downward. I can't think of a situation where the top blade would move any direction but down. ;-) The most common rotation pattern in modern twins is for the top blade(s) to rotate towards the fuselage. KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
Just for the heck of it..... in comparison...
On a twin engine BOAT , the prop tips rotate tips outward at the top of the arcs for best handling and fuel econmy.. The boat handles like a pig if this is set up in backwards, and the fuel economy plummits.. Dave On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:31:52 -0500, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: "Jim Macklin" wrote in message ... P-factor and rotation is always, by convention, based on the top blade moving downward. I can't think of a situation where the top blade would move any direction but down. ;-) The most common rotation pattern in modern twins is for the top blade(s) to rotate towards the fuselage. KB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
are "counter-rotating" and "contra-rotating" interchangeable terms?
On Nov 11, 8:51 am, Dave wrote: Just for the heck of it..... in comparison... On a twin engine BOAT , the prop tips rotate tips outward at the top of the arcs for best handling and fuel econmy.. The boat handles like a pig if this is set up in backwards, and the fuel economy plummits.. Dave For what it's worth, I found this on one of the boat news groups regarding screw rotation. this discussion (the discussion being direction of rotation of twin screwed boats) there are several other factors to consider. If you look at the keel of the German Z- Boats, they had a concavity to the stern section of the boat running from where the keel began to rise deck ward back. The theory here was that this would tunnel the water into each prop. What it did was creat a situation where the boat would suck its stern down with a strong reverse command. In combat warships we are always trying to improve our turning ability with out stepping out side the rules. There has been experimentation with both applications. We have seen the same thing that Peter mentioned, but not with a large amount of speed increase. We have found that with the props rotating inward, two things are noted that are considered an improvement in relationship to the props rotating outward. 1) That there is a slight decrease in the cavitation noted with strong reverse commands and that the ship will get up and move a little quicker. This is thought to be caused by a decrease in water turbulence caused by the water and air ( there is air to the underside of the boat) running off of the keel as the prop tends to pull water in from the outboard aspect of the boat. 2) Perhaps more important is the slight improvement in the turn radious noted with the inboard turning props. This is suspected to be caused by the water from the props pushing against the outboard surface of the exposed turning rudder. In the great scheme of things what we have noted in combat ships is that as you increase the size of the prop you increase speed and cavitation ( especially if that prop starts to get larger than the water flow from the keel can feed). As you increase the rudder size you decrease the turning radious, but you will increase the sudden rocking of the boat as you turn th rudder over and you will decrease the speed of the boat. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|