If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"F-35 Test Flight Deemed a Success"
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:01:33 -0600, Jack wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote: We've got no disagreement about putting a gun in every fighter that has any possibility of being engaged air-to-air. Careful wording, that. What matter the medium in which your target operates, to a true fighter pilot? We wouldn't want to give the impression of air-to-air arrogance. Would we? I'm hardly from the age of air-to-air arrogance. I was more in the Jack-of-too-many-trades era. As a true Neanderthal I vociferously protested against the idea of specialization--one in which the aircraft has more capabilities than the operator. Yet, that's the way we've gone and I'll freely admit that it has turned out to be a better AF. My contention has always been that air-to-air is something a fighter pilot does on the way to and from the target. "CAS is continuing to morph into a stand-off delivery game. The troops-in-contact provide accurate coordinates or laser- designation and the stand-off platform dumps iron on the cross-hairs. It isn't as glamorous as snake-n-nape at 50 feet, but it is much more accurate and effective." -- E. Rasimus Oh sure, very glamorous indeed, but not much use when bad guys are not only in the wire, but on your side of the wire. And that brings up the question of whether 30mm might not be a little too heavy for this particular scenario? Agreed, in principle, but rare in practice. We don't see fixed position fighting very much these days with the concomitant requirement for "danger close" employment. It might recur or might not. And, the gun will be available although not the first choice. Strafing as a mission may suck today, but it always did -- even when it was just too much damn fun to ignore. But as a capability and a skill, it must be respected and won't go away. You can do things with a gun you can't do without it, I'm sure you'll agree. And those are very important jobs -- CAS jobs -- the kind that keep our people fighting or bring them home when they can't. I'm not sure I agree if we are talking ground attack that there are things that can be done with a gun that can't be done better with another weapon--except for maybe writing your name in the snow. The new generation of small bombs are going to be very nice tools for killing Abdullah in the bedroom next door. T-I-C and SAR assets won't always have laser-designators and GPS. If they had all that stuff working they might not be in so much trouble in the first place. It will be a very rare detachment that doesn't have GPS or laser capability. When you can buy a Garmin to fit in your shirt pocket from Cabela's, there's no reason not to have one in the infantryman's kit. And, they do. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |