Graphics card for fs 2004

HI, I am planning to upgrade my graphics card,, any ideas what kind of
a card would make sence, I have a PC using XP, intel 2.6 processor and
512 ram Thanks

I've found that Nvidia has been a good card over the years. Check out their
models and see what fits your price and needs.

sam wrote:

HI, I am planning to upgrade my graphics card,, any ideas what kind of
a card would make sence, I have a PC using XP, intel 2.6 processor and
512 ram Thanks

--
Brett I. Holcomb

Remove R777 to email

"sam" wrote in message
oups.com...
HI, I am planning to upgrade my graphics card,, any ideas what kind of
a card would make sence, I have a PC using XP, intel 2.6 processor and
512 ram Thanks


Hi there,i'm using an Nvidia 6800GT with an Intel 2.8 CPU......works great!!
One thing to be aware of before buying is most high-end GPU's may need a
power source from your PSU.In my case this meant upgrading the PSU as well.

regards,
dAVE

"Dave" wrote in message
...

"sam" wrote in message
oups.com...
HI, I am planning to upgrade my graphics card,, any ideas what kind of
a card would make sence, I have a PC using XP, intel 2.6 processor and
512 ram Thanks


Hi there,i'm using an Nvidia 6800GT with an Intel 2.8 CPU......works
great!!
One thing to be aware of before buying is most high-end GPU's may need a
power source from your PSU.In my case this meant upgrading the PSU as
well.

regards,
dAVE



Forgot to add,upgrading to 1G of RAM from your 512 should make a difference
too.

I'm assuming you mean either an AGP or PCI-e card. When you get your
card, can you please post your results? Thanks.

Look up Matrox Pahelia 128 card. It will give you three screens to use. You
will not regret it!

Cheers,

Quilly

Sorry, but an individual reply goes into my spam filter

sam wrote:

HI, I am planning to upgrade my graphics card,, any ideas what kind of
a card would make sence, I have a PC using XP, intel 2.6 processor and
512 ram Thanks


Depends on your budget. If you're trying to get improved performance,
consider getting an nVidia FX-5200 (try to find one with 256mb video
RAM) AND increasing your memory from 512mb to 1gb (or more). The 5200
will do a very good job, but you'll really get the performance
improvement from the additional memory. IMO, 512 isn't quite enough
when additional resolution is desired.

Man, I hope that's a typo, FX-5200 is the sequel to the MX series of
GF4MX cards. It is cheap, but you'll only get what you pay for in this case.
DirectX 9 compatibility with 5200 cards is only there if one really likes
slide shows. Getting a used GF4 Ti would be a far better bang for alittle
more buck if DX9 compatibility isn't required, and I do believe that in the
case of FS2004 it isn't. Radeon 9200 (don't get the SE version!) will beat
FX5200 hands down while the prices are similar, plus it is DX9 compatible.
Then again GF4 Ti is way better than R9200...

--
- Mr 100K wishes you all the best -
"Cal Vanize" wrote in message
...

Depends on your budget. If you're trying to get improved performance,
consider getting an nVidia FX-5200 (try to find one with 256mb video RAM)
AND increasing your memory from 512mb to 1gb (or more). The 5200 will do
a very good job, but you'll really get the performance improvement from
the additional memory. IMO, 512 isn't quite enough when additional
resolution is desired.

Leopold wrote:

Man, I hope that's a typo, FX-5200 is the sequel to the MX series of
GF4MX cards. It is cheap, but you'll only get what you pay for in this
case. DirectX 9 compatibility with 5200 cards is only there if one
really likes slide shows. Getting a used GF4 Ti would be a far better
bang for alittle more buck if DX9 compatibility isn't required, and I do
believe that in the case of FS2004 it isn't. Radeon 9200 (don't get the
SE version!) will beat FX5200 hands down while the prices are similar,
plus it is DX9 compatible. Then again GF4 Ti is way better than R9200...


FX-5200 works fine even if the monitor is a 32" LDC HDTV in native mode
(768 x 1366). More important point is to invest in more memory. I just
monitored a FS2004 session and my system was using a little over 760mb
of memory (out of 1gb).

My personal preference is for nVidia video cards. Others prefer ATI.
I'm not sure it makes much difference for FS. YMMV.