A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An Officer.......



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old February 26th 04, 12:40 AM
Greasy Rider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 Feb 2004 00:29:58 GMT, (ArtKramr) disturbed the
phosphur particles on my screen with the following:

I dont think you had the stuff to make it on our crew.


The older you get , the better you were.


  #62  
Old February 26th 04, 03:30 AM
Pete
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote


He came back later with 4 bombs to gsve me a choice. I chose one. He

loaded
and that was the end of the story. We ;flew the mission. The hits were

good.
Moral of the story?. Take no **** from any one ever. When you know your

job,
demand that it be carried out to the letter. NOW.


He straightened out the bent one vane, and brought you 3 new bombs. You
couldn't tell the difference.

Pete


  #63  
Old February 26th 04, 04:01 AM
Dave Holford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Pete wrote:

"ArtKramr" wrote


He came back later with 4 bombs to gsve me a choice. I chose one. He

loaded
and that was the end of the story. We ;flew the mission. The hits were

good.
Moral of the story?. Take no **** from any one ever. When you know your

job,
demand that it be carried out to the letter. NOW.


He straightened out the bent one vane, and brought you 3 new bombs. You
couldn't tell the difference.

Pete



He probably did, and then they had a good laugh over your inability to
notice it.

Dave
  #65  
Old February 26th 04, 09:32 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Emmanuel Gustin" wrote in message
...
"John Keeney" wrote in message
...

Britannia ruled the waves for how long? Quite some time.
Kind of hard to make the case they do today, is it because
they forgot the Press-Gangs and flogging?


In very large part: Money. Every since Henry VIII, if not earlier,
British governments simply spent more on their fleet than anyone
else. Press-gangs were the sorry consequence of the need to keep
that large fleet manned, but other nations used similar means.

One can drive strict discipline too far, of course. I have long been
wondering whether the cautious, slow action of British armies
during WWII, which was so often criticised by the Germans
and the Americans alike, and is usually blamed on the leadership
of Montgomery, wasn't in large part the fault of the NCOs -- between
July 1940 and June 1944 these perhaps got too much opportunity to
drill every sense of initiative out of their soldiers. That may also
explain why the less-disciplined Australian troops were valued
so highly by Commonwealth commanders.


This is a odd reading of the situation

The NCO's in the British army fighting around Caen
were for the most part extremely experienced by that
stage of the war.My father was one of them having
been in the army since 1938 and fought with the BEF
in France then got shipped to North Africa. In the
western desert they fought alongside the Australians.

The problem around Caen was simply that they were
pinning down 80% of the Panzer divisions available
in Normandy and that the Germans had plenty
of time to dig in. When you have to advance across
pre-surveyed killing fields covered by 88mm AT
guns , machine guns and artillery progress tends to be slow.
Throw in the bocage and take way room for manoeveur
and you end with a nasty battle of attrition.

Once the breakout was made British and Canadian troops
advanced just as quickly as anyone else. Few orders were
given during this phase and units down to company level
were expected to act on their own initiative to exploit
the situation. As my father recalled it they were given only
general information regarding the objective and simply kept
pushing on until they ran beyond their supply lines around
Antwerp.

Last but not least one of the reasons Montgomery was
like by his troops was that he made a point of letting
them know what the broad plan was and expected
junior officers and NCO's to use their own initiative.

Keith


  #67  
Old February 26th 04, 06:24 PM
OXMORON1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pete wrote in reply to Art's:
Not a chance in hell I guess you have no idea what it takes to get that

job
done. do you?.


No, I guess not. 16 yrs in as an armament specialst (4 yrs as an
instructor/evaluator of such) conveys zero knowledge about fuzes, vanes,
fins, bombs, and how easy they are to bend and unbend....

Nope....I never touched one.

Jeez Pete! You are over qualified to comment on Art's challenge of your
qualifications. Your training didn't take place during WWII and you should know
by now that WWII supercedes all other information.

Rick

  #70  
Old February 26th 04, 10:04 PM
Leslie Swartz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bull****.

Your irrelevant "example" was just plain silly.

Sometimes it's better to just let a loser ramble; it's more efficient, and
the cost of retraining him is way above the benefit.

Steve Swartz




"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: An Officer.......
From: "D. Strang"
Date: 2/24/04 10:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: fhX_b.5649$m4.4917@okepread03

"ArtKramr" wrote

Want some more examples?


No. I vote we let this thread die in peace...


The better part of valor


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A problem in the Military ? Nick Jade Military Aviation 54 March 15th 04 07:59 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Fire officer tops in field — again Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 13th 03 08:37 PM
Army officer recieves Tuskegee Airman Award Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 21st 03 09:15 PM
Officer at Peterson AFB to be disciplined Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 14th 03 02:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.