A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sukhoi PAK-FA ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old February 16th 05, 11:48 PM
Nele VII
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Barry George wrote in message ...
Yes, I believe that it is likely that the PAK-FA will try to fill both

roles.

Russia still has a requirement for a heavy interceptor and given the

decisions so far it seems
likely funding will someday be reserved for it. It will be ten or twenty

years before there is
enough funding for it and it will have to compete with S-400 family SAMS.

Russia needs such
interceptors for defending such a large frontier but they cost money. The

Mig-31 weighs as much as
four unloaded Mig-29s and the fuel bills for it are shocking.


Soviet Fulcrum-A's or C's with their 1980-vintage equipment are more a match
to F-16A's (that's the SMT upgrade is for, but there is no money). About the
MiG-31 fuel bills-well, T-6 is not JP-7 (if it is T-6 at all), and MiG-31's
replaced Tu-128's, the lagest fighters/interceptors ever used in operational
service! Maintenance is the problem, not fuel. I haven't herd about the
latest BM conversions.


It will have to have very long range and will most likely (I am guessing

here) could take two forms
either that of a low speed, extremely high altitude missile platform or a

more costly fighter with
sprint speeds in combat of over mach 3.5! It is slightly possible that such

a project could be based
off of the medium and heavy bombers (think T-60 and T-4MS) which will

replace the Su-24 and Su-34.

Su-24/32FN are not medium nor heavy bombers (Tu-22M3/4 and Tu-160 are).
According to Samoilovytch, related drawings went to Tupolev that supposedly
trashed them, and MS projects never went further than the model phase
(Tu-160 is the resulting aircraft, although T-4MS allegedly got the
contest). T-4 (prototype) and T-4MS (proposal) are as much different as
XB-70 and B-1 (actually, MS is some combination of those).


Run a search on the mig project 7.01 to see the next stage above MFI!
-Jonas Weselake-George


Sukhoi already got MFI project go-ahead, and MIG is struggling. There is
nothing much wrong with MAPO-MIG, except that Sukhoi had Simonov-and he is
much better salesman than Belyakov. According to Samoilovytch, there was
some funny equipment that was designed by "Sukhoi" when Simonov came there!

Nele

NULLA ROSA SINE SPINA


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SU-29 vs Extra 300L? [email protected] Aerobatics 6 December 14th 04 07:51 PM
best US jet vs Russian jets? ville terminale Military Aviation 86 March 12th 04 05:27 PM
India refuses delivery of Sukhoi jets... Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Military Aviation 2 December 17th 03 10:58 PM
Fly MiG and Sukhoi Jets Webmaster Military Aviation 0 July 9th 03 06:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.