A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA to order fuel tank modifications on 3,800 commercial airplanes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th 04, 01:12 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAA to order fuel tank modifications on 3,800 commercial airplanes



The wheels grind slowly (8 years later)....


U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800
commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion
like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The
initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for
the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530
million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator
Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this
year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device
on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit
existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however,
can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to
reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially
volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is
achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air.
(Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004)

Mo
http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04
  #2  
Old February 18th 04, 12:29 PM
Mark S Conway
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Like we believe it was a fuel tank explosion!!!
Please.....




"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...


The wheels grind slowly (8 years later)....


U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800
commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion
like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The
initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for
the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530
million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator
Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this
year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device
on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit
existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however,
can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to
reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially
volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is
achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air.
(Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004)

Mo
http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04



  #3  
Old February 22nd 04, 02:49 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
.. .


The wheels grind slowly (8 years later)....


U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800
commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion
like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The
initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for
the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530
million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator
Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this
year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device
on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit
existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however,
can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to
reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially
volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is
achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air.
(Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004)

Mo
http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04


On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:29:25 GMT, "Mark S Conway"
wrote in Message-Id:
FUIYb.213502$U%5.1235945@attbi_s03:

Like we believe it was a fuel tank explosion!!!
Please.....


Apparently Administrator Blakey believes it:


A DECADE LATER, FAA MOVES ON EXPLODING FUEL TANKS
The FAA is hoping to propose a rule this fall that would require
airlines to install equipment to lessen the chance of in-flight
fuel-tank explosions. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey announced the
initiative Tuesday, saying the rule is being considered because new
technology, largely developed by the agency itself, is now available
to displace some of the oxygen within fuel tanks with inert nitrogen.
"We're taking this step because we have found a practical solution,"
she told a news conference. The new, roughly $220,000-per-plane rule
would be phased in over seven years starting in 2006, 10 years after
the NTSB determined the belly tank of a TWA Boeing 747 (Flight 800)
exploded off Long Island, killing 230 people. It was not the first or
the last event of its kind.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#186748
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing fuel cut-off valve with non-a/c part??? Michael Horowitz Owning 46 January 15th 05 10:20 PM
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 Bernardz Military Aviation 205 July 22nd 04 05:31 PM
Yo! Fuel Tank! Veeduber Home Built 15 October 25th 03 02:57 AM
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump Greg Reid Home Built 15 October 7th 03 07:09 PM
C210 fuel tank vents Eric Brown Owning 2 September 27th 03 02:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.